Active Users:643 Time:03/08/2025 02:14:49 AM
Back to Messageboard Post New Thread Search Help Stats Rules
I agree darius_sedai Send a noteboard - 26/10/2010 05:32:57 PM

However, I agree with you that there is no evidence to declare that balefire can or cannot affect a One Power weave, which is why I worded my previous response very carefully to indicate that it would not result in a temporal reversal, but I left out whether or not the targeted weave would be destroyed.


Rand wove a shield around himself when Osan'gar attacked him, and he said it would deflect everything except balefire.


But from the POV Graendal's Gateway snapped shut just as the wave of white hit ... she could still see Aran'gar's face when it closed.
Domani Drag Queen in the White Tower ... Aran'gar watch out!
This message last edited by darius_sedai on 26/10/2010 at 06:07:20 PM
Reply to message
Prologue: A Question on Gateways Night Walker - 25/10/2010 07:33:23 PM 1576 Views
I was wondering this myself *NM* Sidious - 25/10/2010 08:23:57 PM 428 Views
I'm thinking it got overlooked... *NM* Night Walker - 25/10/2010 08:35:31 PM 392 Views
I'm inclined to agree, but there are other possibilities Sidious - 25/10/2010 08:48:01 PM 952 Views
Seems pretty obvious to me that she released it (and was holding it) before the BF hit it darius_sedai - 26/10/2010 04:40:04 AM 837 Views
Balefire's reversal of actions taken only works on living things that can perform said actions. TaskmasterJack - 25/10/2010 09:36:46 PM 1013 Views
Agreed. I think Graendal's weave is only undone if the BF hits her, not the gateway *NM* newyorkersedai - 25/10/2010 10:48:07 PM 355 Views
*nods* *NM* RugbyPlayingAshaman - 26/10/2010 05:08:20 PM 360 Views
thats not true Apsalar Shadowdancer - 26/10/2010 01:18:16 AM 884 Views
It is true. Objects do not have threads that can be affected by balefire. TaskmasterJack - 26/10/2010 01:56:48 AM 914 Views
Re: It is true. Objects do not have threads that can be affected by balefire. car'a'aman - 26/10/2010 04:55:20 AM 855 Views
This will sound bad to say and I realize it sounds more petulant than it is... TaskmasterJack - 27/10/2010 02:31:33 AM 985 Views
here is the quote from the sceen, it is not confusing, you were just to lazy to read it. Apsalar Shadowdancer - 26/10/2010 07:24:19 AM 842 Views
I don't agree Skeeve the Great - 26/10/2010 12:08:41 PM 946 Views
so you think it made the hole in the boat back in time to allow the water into the boat Apsalar Shadowdancer - 26/10/2010 06:25:37 PM 931 Views
Re: Balefire TaskmasterJack - 27/10/2010 03:02:39 AM 1016 Views
we will just have to agree to disagree then. Apsalar Shadowdancer - 27/10/2010 03:51:41 AM 899 Views
sceen=scene, yes? And I didn't mean confusing to me. I meant to others. It's always been clear to me TaskmasterJack - 27/10/2010 02:51:41 AM 1017 Views
A weave should be destroyed Sidious - 26/10/2010 10:19:13 AM 786 Views
Re: A weave should be destroyed Skeeve the Great - 26/10/2010 12:03:16 PM 853 Views
That has more to do with the nature of both weaves RugbyPlayingAshaman - 26/10/2010 05:07:48 PM 740 Views
I agree darius_sedai - 26/10/2010 05:32:57 PM 766 Views
Thank you for reminding us of the scene, but it doesn't sell me completely. TaskmasterJack - 27/10/2010 02:28:00 AM 1007 Views
*nods* RugbyPlayingAshaman - 26/10/2010 05:05:12 PM 820 Views
Back to Messageboard Post New Thread Search Help Stats Rules

Reply to Message

Block Quote Paragraph Quote
Formatting
Smiley Codes