Active Users:349 Time:02/05/2025 08:42:40 AM
Back to Messageboard Post New Thread Search Help Stats Rules
Re: Have some question Skeeve the Great Send a noteboard - 28/11/2010 07:01:38 PM


That's exactly my point.

Brandon made very exciting and complicated story line. And most people immediately started to blame him for their own fallacy.

Basically, there were no messed up scene, it's you who have messed up the storyline in your mind, but was very quick to dump a lot of crap on Brandon.


My not remembering the scene perfectly doesn't detract from my original point nor does it make it invalid. I disagree with the OP and think the timeline and storyline are horribly mixed up between both books. It's awkwardly handled and confusing, especially to the casual reader. If I'm not supposed to blame Brandon for that then whom would you suggest I blame instead? He wrote the books.

C xx


How about to blame yourself for a change? For a casual reader, like me, Brandon didn't horribly mixed up anything. I was perfectly able to get the story line straight the first time I read ToM with no problem.

Excluding your faulty example of Perrin, what else exactly was horribly messed up?
Reply to message
/tGS: These are damned good books. LadyLorraine - 27/11/2010 02:22:05 AM 1476 Views
OK. *NM* moratcorlm - 27/11/2010 02:35:06 AM 331 Views
meh. ToM sucked for me. after tGS, I had become a bit hopeful, but now I see ... Velveti - 27/11/2010 03:39:49 AM 834 Views
You keep trying to make that nickname stick... beetnemesis - 27/11/2010 08:47:52 PM 836 Views
yeah!!..... Insomdeon - 27/11/2010 08:55:37 PM 758 Views
meh. Velveti - 27/11/2010 09:31:30 PM 703 Views
Yeah, they are chandra - 27/11/2010 06:03:59 AM 770 Views
Disagree strongly on the time line issue - TOM showed what a mistake splitting by 'clusters' was IMO ajfurst - 27/11/2010 07:24:55 AM 807 Views
Re: Disagree strongly on the time line issue - TOM showed what a mistake splitting by 'clusters' was Cynewulf - 27/11/2010 05:59:47 PM 704 Views
I agree with this as well. RandAllThor - 27/11/2010 06:31:37 PM 816 Views
Splitting it this way was the only realistic choice Zeratul - 29/11/2010 01:58:52 PM 675 Views
Disagree - plus COT lacked almost anything full stop ajfurst - 30/11/2010 12:03:24 AM 849 Views
Re: Disagree - plus COT lacked almost anything full stop Lo'oris - 30/11/2010 12:18:57 AM 702 Views
It will be better than CoT, sure, but still not good enough to appease most fans Zeratul - 30/11/2010 06:20:38 PM 838 Views
In any case you can see why RJ wanted one book ajfurst - 01/12/2010 01:41:56 AM 706 Views
BS style Kieran - 27/11/2010 07:25:38 AM 895 Views
That's the thing! If it was in its normal, Jordan paced writing, ... Bookwyrm - 27/11/2010 08:52:05 AM 759 Views
Re: That's the thing! If it was in its normal, Jordan paced writing, ... Cynewulf - 27/11/2010 11:57:22 PM 747 Views
Sin?! What, Jordan is a god now? Some flawless divine figure of fantasy writing? Puh-leaze! Bookwyrm - 28/11/2010 04:29:54 AM 644 Views
And you know how RJ would've outlined the books from where? Skeeve the Great - 28/11/2010 05:07:31 AM 753 Views
BURN! *NM* Darth_Katie - 29/11/2010 01:20:21 AM 333 Views
Re: And you know how RJ would've outlined the books from where? Cynewulf - 29/11/2010 08:16:12 AM 674 Views
so...you're guessing. LadyLorraine - 30/11/2010 08:08:14 PM 734 Views
Re: so...you're guessing. Cynewulf - 01/12/2010 08:08:41 PM 640 Views
My only problems are Mats sudden drop in literacy and the timeline. *NM* Lohikaarme - 27/11/2010 11:51:25 AM 348 Views
Not so much charlene - 27/11/2010 09:52:23 PM 863 Views
I agree with this Deadsy - 27/11/2010 10:37:08 PM 689 Views
Have some question Skeeve the Great - 28/11/2010 05:38:42 AM 758 Views
Re: Have some question charlene - 28/11/2010 05:54:10 PM 703 Views
Re: Have some question Skeeve the Great - 28/11/2010 06:19:30 PM 680 Views
Re: Have some question charlene - 28/11/2010 06:50:40 PM 657 Views
Re: Have some question Skeeve the Great - 28/11/2010 07:01:38 PM 812 Views
Re: Have some question charlene - 29/11/2010 09:13:17 AM 663 Views
You stole my putters name, btw. Joel - 29/11/2010 01:14:47 PM 787 Views
I had no problem following the jumps. LadyLorraine - 29/11/2010 05:05:01 PM 672 Views
Yeah, anyone who found this bad clearly hasn't read Catch 22 Lord Haart - 30/11/2010 04:38:12 AM 651 Views
I didn't have any problems either. *NM* Darth_Katie - 30/11/2010 04:40:24 AM 348 Views
Exactly my feeling on TGS, but I do think ToM inferior to it (though still good). Joel - 28/11/2010 02:55:53 PM 987 Views
Re: Exactly my feeling on TGS, but I do think ToM inferior to it (though still good). Lo'oris - 28/11/2010 03:04:57 PM 643 Views
Right, it's good, but could be better (or it could be better, but is still good). Joel - 28/11/2010 03:12:15 PM 704 Views
Re: Exactly my feeling on TGS, but I do think ToM inferior to it (though still good). moratcorlm - 29/11/2010 12:55:40 AM 750 Views
Radically different perspectives, it seems; I bet you don't even like leggy blondes. Joel - 29/11/2010 01:11:16 PM 717 Views
"Reading" TGS &ToM in audio format and just weeks apart made them work better together. *NM* Zalis - 29/11/2010 07:48:51 PM 419 Views
I agree. Also, chopping up the timelines was the best decision given the circumstances. Nate - 01/12/2010 02:02:07 PM 717 Views
Re: I agree. Also, chopping up the timelines was the best decision given the circumstances. Lo'oris - 01/12/2010 02:31:46 PM 665 Views
Re: I agree. Also, chopping up the timelines was the best decision given the circumstances. Cynewulf - 01/12/2010 08:17:57 PM 740 Views
Um. Nate - 01/12/2010 08:49:35 PM 770 Views
Back to Messageboard Post New Thread Search Help Stats Rules

Reply to Message

Block Quote Paragraph Quote
Formatting
Smiley Codes