Active Users:387 Time:05/05/2024 12:04:52 PM
Re: Have some question charlene Send a noteboard - 28/11/2010 06:50:40 PM


That's exactly my point.

Brandon made very exciting and complicated story line. And most people immediately started to blame him for their own fallacy.

Basically, there were no messed up scene, it's you who have messed up the storyline in your mind, but was very quick to dump a lot of crap on Brandon.


My not remembering the scene perfectly doesn't detract from my original point nor does it make it invalid. I disagree with the OP and think the timeline and storyline are horribly mixed up between both books. It's awkwardly handled and confusing, especially to the casual reader. If I'm not supposed to blame Brandon for that then whom would you suggest I blame instead? He wrote the books.

C xx
Reply to message
/tGS: These are damned good books. - 27/11/2010 02:22:05 AM 1316 Views
OK. *NM* - 27/11/2010 02:35:06 AM 264 Views
meh. ToM sucked for me. after tGS, I had become a bit hopeful, but now I see ... - 27/11/2010 03:39:49 AM 693 Views
You keep trying to make that nickname stick... - 27/11/2010 08:47:52 PM 687 Views
yeah!!..... - 27/11/2010 08:55:37 PM 620 Views
meh. - 27/11/2010 09:31:30 PM 558 Views
Yeah, they are - 27/11/2010 06:03:59 AM 627 Views
Disagree strongly on the time line issue - TOM showed what a mistake splitting by 'clusters' was IMO - 27/11/2010 07:24:55 AM 662 Views
Re: Disagree strongly on the time line issue - TOM showed what a mistake splitting by 'clusters' was - 27/11/2010 05:59:47 PM 561 Views
I agree with this as well. - 27/11/2010 06:31:37 PM 669 Views
Splitting it this way was the only realistic choice - 29/11/2010 01:58:52 PM 526 Views
Disagree - plus COT lacked almost anything full stop - 30/11/2010 12:03:24 AM 700 Views
Re: Disagree - plus COT lacked almost anything full stop - 30/11/2010 12:18:57 AM 559 Views
It will be better than CoT, sure, but still not good enough to appease most fans - 30/11/2010 06:20:38 PM 696 Views
In any case you can see why RJ wanted one book - 01/12/2010 01:41:56 AM 561 Views
BS style - 27/11/2010 07:25:38 AM 754 Views
That's the thing! If it was in its normal, Jordan paced writing, ... - 27/11/2010 08:52:05 AM 611 Views
Re: That's the thing! If it was in its normal, Jordan paced writing, ... - 27/11/2010 11:57:22 PM 600 Views
And you know how RJ would've outlined the books from where? - 28/11/2010 05:07:31 AM 604 Views
BURN! *NM* - 29/11/2010 01:20:21 AM 276 Views
Re: And you know how RJ would've outlined the books from where? - 29/11/2010 08:16:12 AM 518 Views
so...you're guessing. - 30/11/2010 08:08:14 PM 565 Views
Re: so...you're guessing. - 01/12/2010 08:08:41 PM 498 Views
My only problems are Mats sudden drop in literacy and the timeline. *NM* - 27/11/2010 11:51:25 AM 283 Views
Not so much - 27/11/2010 09:52:23 PM 713 Views
I agree with this - 27/11/2010 10:37:08 PM 538 Views
Have some question - 28/11/2010 05:38:42 AM 616 Views
Re: Have some question - 28/11/2010 05:54:10 PM 552 Views
Re: Have some question - 28/11/2010 06:19:30 PM 536 Views
Re: Have some question - 28/11/2010 06:50:40 PM 506 Views
Re: Have some question - 28/11/2010 07:01:38 PM 671 Views
Re: Have some question - 29/11/2010 09:13:17 AM 515 Views
You stole my putters name, btw. - 29/11/2010 01:14:47 PM 628 Views
I had no problem following the jumps. - 29/11/2010 05:05:01 PM 526 Views
Yeah, anyone who found this bad clearly hasn't read Catch 22 - 30/11/2010 04:38:12 AM 501 Views
I didn't have any problems either. *NM* - 30/11/2010 04:40:24 AM 280 Views

Reply to Message