Active Users:488 Time:29/10/2026 10:57:32 AM
Re: And you know how RJ would've outlined the books from where? Cynewulf Send a noteboard - 29/11/2010 08:16:12 AM
it would NO WAY be a one book ending that some ppl here keep saying he would have made the book.


That is not what "ppl" are saying. "People" are well aware that this book might have been split even with RJ behind the wheel. The thing is, though, that RJ would have split the story in a way faithful to his outline. Sanderson's sin here is that he had the arrogance to completely restructure RJ's outline, which has resulted in much poorer story.


"From" a literary mind. Also, it is quite easily inferrable from comments Sanderson has made. Frankly, after TGS he had painted himself into a corner. He made a botched-job of this.
Reply to message
/tGS: These are damned good books. - 27/11/2010 02:22:05 AM 1785 Views
OK. *NM* - 27/11/2010 02:35:06 AM 458 Views
meh. ToM sucked for me. after tGS, I had become a bit hopeful, but now I see ... - 27/11/2010 03:39:49 AM 1138 Views
You keep trying to make that nickname stick... - 27/11/2010 08:47:52 PM 1142 Views
yeah!!..... - 27/11/2010 08:55:37 PM 1032 Views
meh. - 27/11/2010 09:31:30 PM 1001 Views
Yeah, they are - 27/11/2010 06:03:59 AM 1057 Views
Disagree strongly on the time line issue - TOM showed what a mistake splitting by 'clusters' was IMO - 27/11/2010 07:24:55 AM 1136 Views
Re: Disagree strongly on the time line issue - TOM showed what a mistake splitting by 'clusters' was - 27/11/2010 05:59:47 PM 1024 Views
I agree with this as well. - 27/11/2010 06:31:37 PM 1124 Views
Splitting it this way was the only realistic choice - 29/11/2010 01:58:52 PM 963 Views
Disagree - plus COT lacked almost anything full stop - 30/11/2010 12:03:24 AM 1150 Views
Re: Disagree - plus COT lacked almost anything full stop - 30/11/2010 12:18:57 AM 996 Views
It will be better than CoT, sure, but still not good enough to appease most fans - 30/11/2010 06:20:38 PM 1149 Views
In any case you can see why RJ wanted one book - 01/12/2010 01:41:56 AM 1034 Views
BS style - 27/11/2010 07:25:38 AM 1218 Views
That's the thing! If it was in its normal, Jordan paced writing, ... - 27/11/2010 08:52:05 AM 1056 Views
Re: That's the thing! If it was in its normal, Jordan paced writing, ... - 27/11/2010 11:57:22 PM 1045 Views
And you know how RJ would've outlined the books from where? - 28/11/2010 05:07:31 AM 1070 Views
BURN! *NM* - 29/11/2010 01:20:21 AM 474 Views
Re: And you know how RJ would've outlined the books from where? - 29/11/2010 08:16:12 AM 944 Views
so...you're guessing. - 30/11/2010 08:08:14 PM 1047 Views
Re: so...you're guessing. - 01/12/2010 08:08:41 PM 925 Views
My only problems are Mats sudden drop in literacy and the timeline. *NM* - 27/11/2010 11:51:25 AM 486 Views
Not so much - 27/11/2010 09:52:23 PM 1204 Views
I agree with this - 27/11/2010 10:37:08 PM 997 Views
Have some question - 28/11/2010 05:38:42 AM 1035 Views
Re: Have some question - 28/11/2010 05:54:10 PM 1004 Views
Re: Have some question - 28/11/2010 06:19:30 PM 973 Views
Re: Have some question - 28/11/2010 06:50:40 PM 950 Views
Re: Have some question - 28/11/2010 07:01:38 PM 1115 Views
Re: Have some question - 29/11/2010 09:13:17 AM 995 Views
You stole my putters name, btw. - 29/11/2010 01:14:47 PM 1068 Views
I had no problem following the jumps. - 29/11/2010 05:05:01 PM 964 Views
Yeah, anyone who found this bad clearly hasn't read Catch 22 - 30/11/2010 04:38:12 AM 948 Views
I didn't have any problems either. *NM* - 30/11/2010 04:40:24 AM 494 Views

Reply to Message