Yeah, anyone who found this bad clearly hasn't read Catch 22
Lord Haart Send a noteboard - 30/11/2010 04:38:12 AM
That's far more convoluted. To be fair, Catch 22 skips around on purpose - that's part of the insanity of war.
Then again, you could claim that the breakdown of timelining in WoT is the result of the DO's touch on the world.
Then again, you could claim that the breakdown of timelining in WoT is the result of the DO's touch on the world.
/tGS: These are damned good books.
- 27/11/2010 02:22:05 AM
1316 Views
meh. ToM sucked for me. after tGS, I had become a bit hopeful, but now I see ...
- 27/11/2010 03:39:49 AM
693 Views
Disagree strongly on the time line issue - TOM showed what a mistake splitting by 'clusters' was IMO
- 27/11/2010 07:24:55 AM
662 Views
Re: Disagree strongly on the time line issue - TOM showed what a mistake splitting by 'clusters' was
- 27/11/2010 05:59:47 PM
561 Views
Splitting it this way was the only realistic choice
- 29/11/2010 01:58:52 PM
526 Views
Disagree - plus COT lacked almost anything full stop
- 30/11/2010 12:03:24 AM
700 Views
It will be better than CoT, sure, but still not good enough to appease most fans
- 30/11/2010 06:20:38 PM
696 Views
BS style
- 27/11/2010 07:25:38 AM
754 Views
That's the thing! If it was in its normal, Jordan paced writing, ...
- 27/11/2010 08:52:05 AM
611 Views
Re: That's the thing! If it was in its normal, Jordan paced writing, ...
- 27/11/2010 11:57:22 PM
600 Views
Sin?! What, Jordan is a god now? Some flawless divine figure of fantasy writing? Puh-leaze!
- 28/11/2010 04:29:54 AM
501 Views
And you know how RJ would've outlined the books from where?
- 28/11/2010 05:07:31 AM
604 Views
Re: And you know how RJ would've outlined the books from where?
- 29/11/2010 08:16:12 AM
518 Views
My only problems are Mats sudden drop in literacy and the timeline. *NM*
- 27/11/2010 11:51:25 AM
283 Views
Not so much
- 27/11/2010 09:52:23 PM
713 Views
Have some question
- 28/11/2010 05:38:42 AM
616 Views
Re: Have some question
- 28/11/2010 05:54:10 PM
552 Views
Re: Have some question
- 28/11/2010 06:19:30 PM
536 Views
Re: Have some question
- 28/11/2010 06:50:40 PM
505 Views
I had no problem following the jumps.
- 29/11/2010 05:05:01 PM
526 Views
Yeah, anyone who found this bad clearly hasn't read Catch 22
- 30/11/2010 04:38:12 AM
501 Views
Exactly my feeling on TGS, but I do think ToM inferior to it (though still good).
- 28/11/2010 02:55:53 PM
840 Views
Re: Exactly my feeling on TGS, but I do think ToM inferior to it (though still good).
- 28/11/2010 03:04:57 PM
492 Views
Right, it's good, but could be better (or it could be better, but is still good).
- 28/11/2010 03:12:15 PM
561 Views
Re: Exactly my feeling on TGS, but I do think ToM inferior to it (though still good).
- 29/11/2010 12:55:40 AM
604 Views
Radically different perspectives, it seems; I bet you don't even like leggy blondes. 
- 29/11/2010 01:11:16 PM
594 Views
- 29/11/2010 01:11:16 PM
594 Views
"Reading" TGS &ToM in audio format and just weeks apart made them work better together. *NM*
- 29/11/2010 07:48:51 PM
349 Views
I agree. Also, chopping up the timelines was the best decision given the circumstances.
- 01/12/2010 02:02:07 PM
563 Views
Re: I agree. Also, chopping up the timelines was the best decision given the circumstances.
- 01/12/2010 02:31:46 PM
508 Views
Re: I agree. Also, chopping up the timelines was the best decision given the circumstances.
- 01/12/2010 08:17:57 PM
586 Views