Active Users:3627 Time:14/09/2026 07:12:05 AM
Re: Have some question Skeeve the Great Send a noteboard - 28/11/2010 07:01:38 PM


That's exactly my point.

Brandon made very exciting and complicated story line. And most people immediately started to blame him for their own fallacy.

Basically, there were no messed up scene, it's you who have messed up the storyline in your mind, but was very quick to dump a lot of crap on Brandon.


My not remembering the scene perfectly doesn't detract from my original point nor does it make it invalid. I disagree with the OP and think the timeline and storyline are horribly mixed up between both books. It's awkwardly handled and confusing, especially to the casual reader. If I'm not supposed to blame Brandon for that then whom would you suggest I blame instead? He wrote the books.

C xx


How about to blame yourself for a change? For a casual reader, like me, Brandon didn't horribly mixed up anything. I was perfectly able to get the story line straight the first time I read ToM with no problem.

Excluding your faulty example of Perrin, what else exactly was horribly messed up?
Reply to message
/tGS: These are damned good books. - 27/11/2010 02:22:05 AM 1761 Views
OK. *NM* - 27/11/2010 02:35:06 AM 448 Views
meh. ToM sucked for me. after tGS, I had become a bit hopeful, but now I see ... - 27/11/2010 03:39:49 AM 1119 Views
You keep trying to make that nickname stick... - 27/11/2010 08:47:52 PM 1119 Views
yeah!!..... - 27/11/2010 08:55:37 PM 1007 Views
meh. - 27/11/2010 09:31:30 PM 976 Views
Yeah, they are - 27/11/2010 06:03:59 AM 1038 Views
Disagree strongly on the time line issue - TOM showed what a mistake splitting by 'clusters' was IMO - 27/11/2010 07:24:55 AM 1105 Views
Re: Disagree strongly on the time line issue - TOM showed what a mistake splitting by 'clusters' was - 27/11/2010 05:59:47 PM 988 Views
I agree with this as well. - 27/11/2010 06:31:37 PM 1095 Views
Splitting it this way was the only realistic choice - 29/11/2010 01:58:52 PM 940 Views
Disagree - plus COT lacked almost anything full stop - 30/11/2010 12:03:24 AM 1125 Views
Re: Disagree - plus COT lacked almost anything full stop - 30/11/2010 12:18:57 AM 973 Views
It will be better than CoT, sure, but still not good enough to appease most fans - 30/11/2010 06:20:38 PM 1118 Views
In any case you can see why RJ wanted one book - 01/12/2010 01:41:56 AM 1008 Views
BS style - 27/11/2010 07:25:38 AM 1193 Views
That's the thing! If it was in its normal, Jordan paced writing, ... - 27/11/2010 08:52:05 AM 1037 Views
Re: That's the thing! If it was in its normal, Jordan paced writing, ... - 27/11/2010 11:57:22 PM 1018 Views
And you know how RJ would've outlined the books from where? - 28/11/2010 05:07:31 AM 1044 Views
BURN! *NM* - 29/11/2010 01:20:21 AM 460 Views
Re: And you know how RJ would've outlined the books from where? - 29/11/2010 08:16:12 AM 924 Views
so...you're guessing. - 30/11/2010 08:08:14 PM 1022 Views
Re: so...you're guessing. - 01/12/2010 08:08:41 PM 904 Views
My only problems are Mats sudden drop in literacy and the timeline. *NM* - 27/11/2010 11:51:25 AM 474 Views
Not so much - 27/11/2010 09:52:23 PM 1166 Views
I agree with this - 27/11/2010 10:37:08 PM 971 Views
Have some question - 28/11/2010 05:38:42 AM 1014 Views
Re: Have some question - 28/11/2010 05:54:10 PM 980 Views
Re: Have some question - 28/11/2010 06:19:30 PM 953 Views
Re: Have some question - 28/11/2010 06:50:40 PM 927 Views
Re: Have some question - 28/11/2010 07:01:38 PM 1085 Views
Re: Have some question - 29/11/2010 09:13:17 AM 960 Views
You stole my putters name, btw. - 29/11/2010 01:14:47 PM 1048 Views
I had no problem following the jumps. - 29/11/2010 05:05:01 PM 929 Views
Yeah, anyone who found this bad clearly hasn't read Catch 22 - 30/11/2010 04:38:12 AM 926 Views
I didn't have any problems either. *NM* - 30/11/2010 04:40:24 AM 485 Views

Reply to Message