Yeah, anyone who found this bad clearly hasn't read Catch 22
Lord Haart Send a noteboard - 30/11/2010 04:38:12 AM
That's far more convoluted. To be fair, Catch 22 skips around on purpose - that's part of the insanity of war.
Then again, you could claim that the breakdown of timelining in WoT is the result of the DO's touch on the world.
Then again, you could claim that the breakdown of timelining in WoT is the result of the DO's touch on the world.
/tGS: These are damned good books.
- 27/11/2010 02:22:05 AM
1618 Views
meh. ToM sucked for me. after tGS, I had become a bit hopeful, but now I see ...
- 27/11/2010 03:39:49 AM
972 Views
Disagree strongly on the time line issue - TOM showed what a mistake splitting by 'clusters' was IMO
- 27/11/2010 07:24:55 AM
942 Views
Re: Disagree strongly on the time line issue - TOM showed what a mistake splitting by 'clusters' was
- 27/11/2010 05:59:47 PM
853 Views
Splitting it this way was the only realistic choice
- 29/11/2010 01:58:52 PM
804 Views
Disagree - plus COT lacked almost anything full stop
- 30/11/2010 12:03:24 AM
983 Views
It will be better than CoT, sure, but still not good enough to appease most fans
- 30/11/2010 06:20:38 PM
973 Views
BS style
- 27/11/2010 07:25:38 AM
1051 Views
That's the thing! If it was in its normal, Jordan paced writing, ...
- 27/11/2010 08:52:05 AM
882 Views
Re: That's the thing! If it was in its normal, Jordan paced writing, ...
- 27/11/2010 11:57:22 PM
879 Views
Sin?! What, Jordan is a god now? Some flawless divine figure of fantasy writing? Puh-leaze!
- 28/11/2010 04:29:54 AM
783 Views
And you know how RJ would've outlined the books from where?
- 28/11/2010 05:07:31 AM
891 Views
Re: And you know how RJ would've outlined the books from where?
- 29/11/2010 08:16:12 AM
786 Views
My only problems are Mats sudden drop in literacy and the timeline. *NM*
- 27/11/2010 11:51:25 AM
414 Views
Not so much
- 27/11/2010 09:52:23 PM
1013 Views
Have some question
- 28/11/2010 05:38:42 AM
886 Views
Re: Have some question
- 28/11/2010 05:54:10 PM
847 Views
Re: Have some question
- 28/11/2010 06:19:30 PM
797 Views
Re: Have some question
- 28/11/2010 06:50:40 PM
789 Views
I had no problem following the jumps.
- 29/11/2010 05:05:01 PM
803 Views
Yeah, anyone who found this bad clearly hasn't read Catch 22
- 30/11/2010 04:38:12 AM
784 Views
Exactly my feeling on TGS, but I do think ToM inferior to it (though still good).
- 28/11/2010 02:55:53 PM
1108 Views
Re: Exactly my feeling on TGS, but I do think ToM inferior to it (though still good).
- 28/11/2010 03:04:57 PM
759 Views
Right, it's good, but could be better (or it could be better, but is still good).
- 28/11/2010 03:12:15 PM
835 Views
Re: Exactly my feeling on TGS, but I do think ToM inferior to it (though still good).
- 29/11/2010 12:55:40 AM
887 Views
Radically different perspectives, it seems; I bet you don't even like leggy blondes. 
- 29/11/2010 01:11:16 PM
864 Views
- 29/11/2010 01:11:16 PM
864 Views
"Reading" TGS &ToM in audio format and just weeks apart made them work better together. *NM*
- 29/11/2010 07:48:51 PM
562 Views
I agree. Also, chopping up the timelines was the best decision given the circumstances.
- 01/12/2010 02:02:07 PM
890 Views
Re: I agree. Also, chopping up the timelines was the best decision given the circumstances.
- 01/12/2010 02:31:46 PM
797 Views
Re: I agree. Also, chopping up the timelines was the best decision given the circumstances.
- 01/12/2010 08:17:57 PM
887 Views