Active Users:465 Time:02/05/2025 05:18:49 PM
I agree with you. Hopefully Post LB there will be a new structure to the AS organization darius_sedai Send a noteboard - 07/12/2010 05:34:01 PM
Egwene wants to reform the WT and forge these alliances. I started out as an AS fan, but towards the end, I really wanted the Wondergirls to start something new.


At the very least with on ongoing threat from the Seanchan I can see the AS, Asha'man, WO and WF allying just to stay free of the leash!
Domani Drag Queen in the White Tower ... Aran'gar watch out!
Reply to message
Nynaeve should not have been made to swear the Oaths - 07/12/2010 03:12:00 PM 1844 Views
Re: Nynaeve should not have been made to swear the Oaths - 07/12/2010 03:22:49 PM 1066 Views
Re: Nynaeve should not have been made to swear the Oaths - 07/12/2010 10:44:01 PM 835 Views
*shrugs* ... the oaths are lame and so full of holes the only value they bring is - 07/12/2010 03:26:21 PM 840 Views
I wonder what would have happened if she refused and left the tower entirely. - 07/12/2010 03:30:58 PM 833 Views
I doubt they would have stopped her ... but there was no real reason for her to refuse the - 07/12/2010 03:34:20 PM 791 Views
no there wasn't a real reason for her to refuse. It'd still be interesting if she did *NM* - 07/12/2010 03:37:45 PM 389 Views
would have made for an interesting spin on the plot - 07/12/2010 05:37:31 PM 794 Views
How is she not a lead? - 07/12/2010 06:25:45 PM 758 Views
She has never really had her own unique plot line - 07/12/2010 06:34:40 PM 724 Views
I'm going to have to disagree with you on that - 07/12/2010 07:46:08 PM 779 Views
Nothing to really argue here except perspective ... to each their own *NM* - 07/12/2010 10:26:04 PM 384 Views
Re: *shrugs* ... the oaths are lame and so full of holes the only value they bring is - 07/12/2010 10:49:12 PM 812 Views
I think that is true of the testing not the Oaths - 08/12/2010 05:08:22 PM 742 Views
she shouldn't have, although I think they should trash the oaths in general - 07/12/2010 03:29:21 PM 755 Views
agreed! and I think Nynaeve's testing rather proved that point - 07/12/2010 03:35:38 PM 815 Views
Especially since Egwene herself didn't really think it necessary for herself to take the tests - 07/12/2010 03:43:18 PM 788 Views
well it looks like such a coalition is part of the plan - 07/12/2010 03:47:03 PM 778 Views
I meant one that would destroy the White Tower - 07/12/2010 03:53:35 PM 835 Views
ahh I see. well maybe they shall - 07/12/2010 04:00:52 PM 740 Views
I agree with you. Hopefully Post LB there will be a new structure to the AS organization - 07/12/2010 05:34:01 PM 711 Views
She was always going to have to swear the Oaths - 07/12/2010 04:42:59 PM 772 Views
Good old political necessity - 07/12/2010 06:29:26 PM 668 Views
Amyrlin's decree - 07/12/2010 09:56:51 PM 756 Views
Brace yourselves, everybody... - 08/12/2010 02:56:43 PM 704 Views
Ooops, double post! *NM* - 08/12/2010 02:58:01 PM 381 Views
And what? To miss all the awesomeness she had before/during/after the test? - 07/12/2010 06:27:23 PM 721 Views
I agree about the test, kind of. The Oaths was going too far. - 07/12/2010 07:02:43 PM 881 Views
Re: I agree about the test, kind of. The Oaths was going too far. - 16/12/2010 10:40:39 AM 623 Views
And yet people keep choosing donuts over lettuce *NM* - 16/12/2010 10:47:04 AM 405 Views
It's supposed to be a required part of being Aes Sedai. - 08/12/2010 08:52:34 AM 691 Views
Has Egwene swore the Oaths? - 08/12/2010 03:11:37 PM 814 Views
Yes - she swore on the Oath Rod in TGS. *NM* - 08/12/2010 03:22:31 PM 433 Views
Love Nynaeve... - 10/12/2010 09:49:13 AM 702 Views
On the contrary, being Aes Sedai means she had to swear the Oaths. - 14/12/2010 04:53:28 AM 685 Views
Re: On the contrary, being Aes Sedai means she had to swear the Oaths. - 14/12/2010 11:53:43 AM 753 Views
Passing your scars on - 14/12/2010 07:07:43 PM 609 Views
Re: Passing your scars on - 14/12/2010 10:45:01 PM 779 Views
Actually I'm not being flippant - 15/12/2010 05:58:22 AM 709 Views
So? - 15/12/2010 11:40:32 AM 774 Views

Reply to Message