It's supposed to be a required part of being Aes Sedai.
˥ɐ ʎpu∀ɹ Send a noteboard - 08/12/2010 08:52:34 AM
Nynaeve was made a full Aes Sedai, absolutely and unconditionally, and retroactively attaching conditions to her keeping the shawl and title is absolutely no different than Elaida revoking the shawl from Shemerin or demanding the sisters swear an additional oath.
Of course it is. Those conditions were supposed to be attatched from the start. Allowing Nynaeve to continue to be a full Aes Sedai while not adhering to the conditions would be the same as redefining what the conditions are to become an Aes Sedai. This is something that Egwene does not have the power to do (and should not). Egwene only got away with it last time because it was politically convinient and raising Nynaeve properly was impossible at the time. And demands of the plot. You know how that works.
Nynaeve should not have been made to swear the Oaths
- 07/12/2010 03:12:00 PM
2008 Views
*shrugs* ... the oaths are lame and so full of holes the only value they bring is
- 07/12/2010 03:26:21 PM
970 Views
I wonder what would have happened if she refused and left the tower entirely.
- 07/12/2010 03:30:58 PM
966 Views
I doubt they would have stopped her ... but there was no real reason for her to refuse the
- 07/12/2010 03:34:20 PM
952 Views
no there wasn't a real reason for her to refuse. It'd still be interesting if she did *NM*
- 07/12/2010 03:37:45 PM
453 Views
would have made for an interesting spin on the plot
- 07/12/2010 05:37:31 PM
943 Views
How is she not a lead?
- 07/12/2010 06:25:45 PM
891 Views
She has never really had her own unique plot line
- 07/12/2010 06:34:40 PM
908 Views
I'm going to have to disagree with you on that
- 07/12/2010 07:46:08 PM
910 Views
Nothing to really argue here except perspective ... to each their own
*NM*
- 07/12/2010 10:26:04 PM
441 Views
*NM*
- 07/12/2010 10:26:04 PM
441 Views
That would have been good - I think she was probably the only woman with such an opportunity
- 07/12/2010 10:59:50 PM
965 Views
Personally, I think it would have been a brillaint twist if Nyneave didn't become Aes Sedai *NM*
- 08/12/2010 12:02:05 AM
488 Views
Re: *shrugs* ... the oaths are lame and so full of holes the only value they bring is
- 07/12/2010 10:49:12 PM
959 Views
she shouldn't have, although I think they should trash the oaths in general
- 07/12/2010 03:29:21 PM
889 Views
Especially since Egwene herself didn't really think it necessary for herself to take the tests
- 07/12/2010 03:43:18 PM
943 Views
well it looks like such a coalition is part of the plan
- 07/12/2010 03:47:03 PM
913 Views
I meant one that would destroy the White Tower
- 07/12/2010 03:53:35 PM
995 Views
- 07/12/2010 03:53:35 PM
995 Views
I agree with you. Hopefully Post LB there will be a new structure to the AS organization
- 07/12/2010 05:34:01 PM
852 Views
She was always going to have to swear the Oaths
- 07/12/2010 04:42:59 PM
909 Views
Brace yourselves, everybody...
- 08/12/2010 02:56:43 PM
847 Views
The only problem with that scenario was that Nynaeve had stuff to do, and could not as Accepted
- 09/12/2010 01:09:45 AM
1002 Views
And what? To miss all the awesomeness she had before/during/after the test?
- 07/12/2010 06:27:23 PM
863 Views
- 07/12/2010 06:27:23 PM
863 Views
I agree about the test, kind of. The Oaths was going too far.
- 07/12/2010 07:02:43 PM
1033 Views
Re: I agree about the test, kind of. The Oaths was going too far.
- 16/12/2010 10:40:39 AM
794 Views
It's supposed to be a required part of being Aes Sedai.
- 08/12/2010 08:52:34 AM
903 Views
On the contrary, being Aes Sedai means she had to swear the Oaths.
- 14/12/2010 04:53:28 AM
818 Views
Re: On the contrary, being Aes Sedai means she had to swear the Oaths.
- 14/12/2010 11:53:43 AM
904 Views
Passing your scars on
- 14/12/2010 07:07:43 PM
759 Views
They believe Oaths necessary, thus an Aes Sedai refusing sets herself apart from and above the rest.
- 16/12/2010 02:26:45 PM
1324 Views
So?
- 15/12/2010 11:40:32 AM
910 Views
From the standpoint of actually changing Tower rules and traditions I agree with you.
- 16/12/2010 02:13:44 PM
1325 Views
