Active Users:615 Time:16/06/2026 03:53:42 PM
I wish lilltempest Send a noteboard - 16/12/2010 08:29:23 PM
Interpreting the 23 stars in this way clearly leads to an interpretation of the sphere as the Tower, with Rand then leading to a collapse of its power and authority - something he would do with sadness (the shaking of his head) but would do if it were necessary. (The ropes are potentially the ties that bind the nations to the Tower). There is potentially an event coming soon at which he will do just that - the confrontation at the Field of Merrilor, where he and Egwene will confront each other over what must be done next, vying for the support of the world's leaders.

It is particularly ironic that Egwene has interpreted the dream in the opposite way, thus indirectly setting into motion the very events that will bring about the outcome it predicts.

Thoughts?



Personally, I'd love it if Rand's meeting there meant the end of the WT's (and Egwene's) stranglehold on the world. Unfortunately, I think DomA is correct in his assessment and Egwene will be "right" yet again. I think RJ must have had some sort of directive that Egwene could never be wrong about anything. It makes me ill, but what do you expect for a Mary Sue character?

That said, I'd like to point something out about Rand's meeting with her. I've seen numerous people claiming that Egwene was not affected by Rand and is immune to his ta'veren nature, but that isn't true. She got dizzy when he arrived, a clear sign, one she even recognized, that she was affected by him. So while Egwene may be little miss perfect mary sue pukefest, she isn't immune to ta'veren.
Reply to message
The significance of 23 stars (TOM Spoilers) - 14/12/2010 11:48:55 PM 4213 Views
It would be a first... - 15/12/2010 02:46:33 AM 1984 Views
Re: It would be a first... - 15/12/2010 04:39:17 AM 1603 Views
I think people aren't giving Egwene enough credit. - 15/12/2010 04:59:09 AM 1635 Views
She's not bringing everyone for a discussion, but for leverage to force him to change his mind. - 19/12/2010 09:54:49 PM 1550 Views
- 20/12/2010 01:50:39 AM 1590 Views
Re: - 20/12/2010 04:37:24 AM 1383 Views
Huh? - 20/12/2010 05:09:39 AM 1444 Views
I find the theory - 20/12/2010 09:18:34 AM 1438 Views
That's a new one to me - 20/12/2010 09:45:09 AM 1500 Views
Your theory is very unlikely - 20/12/2010 09:50:26 AM 1494 Views
If it was a plant, why would it be so oblique? - 29/12/2010 07:22:58 AM 1339 Views
Re: - 20/12/2010 08:09:53 PM 1567 Views
That's not true. - 21/12/2010 02:22:50 AM 1668 Views
Sadly, the thing you reference four times isn't actually anywhere in the book. - 29/12/2010 03:17:15 AM 1781 Views
+1 - 29/12/2010 07:10:41 AM 1514 Views
Don't take this the wrong way, but I think I love you. (edited) - 29/12/2010 06:43:32 PM 1759 Views
Ah, if only I could sell the concept of sister-wives.... - 29/12/2010 07:09:56 PM 1415 Views
Re: It would be a first... - 15/12/2010 12:43:49 PM 2017 Views
Dear lord, you wrote the Egwene haters' ultimate fantasy right there - 19/12/2010 01:41:55 AM 1514 Views
Don't think of use as Egwene haters... - 19/12/2010 04:32:11 AM 1466 Views
One problematic issue...This assumes the Dark One cannot hold himself back once the Seals are broken - 15/12/2010 07:57:53 AM 1691 Views
Err, it's the other way around - 15/12/2010 09:00:38 AM 1572 Views
I see. It's the same thing, really, just looking at it from the opposite perspective... - 15/12/2010 09:14:22 AM 1643 Views
Don't you know it's all about the posturing - 15/12/2010 09:40:15 AM 1644 Views
It's more that you take it out of context - 15/12/2010 11:32:36 AM 1654 Views
So then... - 15/12/2010 06:35:02 PM 1592 Views
Re: So then... - 16/12/2010 03:39:19 AM 1555 Views
Re: So then... - 16/12/2010 08:11:37 AM 1491 Views
Mierin - 16/12/2010 08:13:55 AM 1735 Views
It would be a good strategy for a conventional war, but - 16/12/2010 07:32:30 AM 1585 Views
Nature of the DO - 15/12/2010 10:38:24 PM 1421 Views
While I agree overall, I think this is a case where Rand/TDR mistakes his role - 15/12/2010 05:37:25 PM 1393 Views
I don't see why Egwene would oppose his plan - 15/12/2010 06:17:47 PM 1417 Views
I don't think that's the issue. - 15/12/2010 07:31:03 PM 1506 Views
I think Egwene is successful and Rand has to go to the Seanchan for female channeler assistance - 18/12/2010 12:47:54 AM 1559 Views
Egwene's dream seems a little more personal than that - 18/12/2010 04:55:37 AM 1377 Views
Yes - 18/12/2010 07:57:35 AM 1362 Views
Actually, I think Tuon will capture her, and then release her. *NM* - 18/12/2010 02:47:42 PM 733 Views
Re: It would be a first... - 18/12/2010 02:48:40 PM 1537 Views
Re: It would be a first... - 18/12/2010 03:28:57 PM 1487 Views
Those are vewings and prophesies... - 18/12/2010 03:43:55 PM 1292 Views
I wish - 16/12/2010 08:29:23 PM 1487 Views
That's just it: Egwene is not only wrong, she's narratively wrong. - 19/12/2010 11:30:35 PM 1897 Views
Man, that's the best take on Egwene I have ever read. - 20/12/2010 12:38:07 AM 1484 Views
+1 - 20/12/2010 01:07:24 AM 1495 Views
You may be onto something there. - 20/12/2010 01:35:46 AM 1482 Views
Thanks. - 20/12/2010 01:24:42 AM 1450 Views
Re: That's just it: Egwene is not only wrong, she's narratively wrong. - 20/12/2010 04:39:57 PM 1580 Views
Wish I'd read this sooner, 'cos I agree on several points. - 29/12/2010 03:38:59 AM 1504 Views
Re: Wish I'd read this sooner, 'cos I agree on several points. - 29/12/2010 07:32:49 AM 1452 Views
It seems an odd oversight, yes; I can't even recall her being Delved when the truth was revealed. - 29/12/2010 12:40:00 PM 1472 Views
Ensure this value has at most 100 characters (it has 101). - 29/12/2010 03:00:22 PM 3184 Views
Ah, good point; Rand might have to do the job himself. - 29/12/2010 06:43:44 PM 1451 Views
More likely to be Flinn. - 29/12/2010 08:18:19 PM 1494 Views
Maybe, once he knows the signs and techniques. - 30/12/2010 03:10:27 PM 1455 Views
Not sure if Rand had seized the source yet - he wouldn't have wanted to do it in front of Ramshalan - 30/12/2010 03:15:43 PM 1403 Views
Good point, too. - 30/12/2010 03:17:06 PM 1403 Views
He was holding the gateway open. *NM* - 30/12/2010 04:27:25 PM 698 Views
Thanks, had forgotten that. - 31/12/2010 04:43:25 AM 1380 Views

Reply to Message