Active Users:378 Time:01/05/2025 06:28:56 AM
Back to Messageboard Post New Thread Search Help Stats Rules
I dissagree Ashaman Narishma Send a noteboard - 24/12/2010 07:09:41 PM
yeah, isn't that how the "deathgates" work? Shadow spawn can't survive being touched by the O.P. So when they pass through a gateway it kills them. Tollocs check in but they don't check out.


well, IIRC the deathgates mostly work on the principle that the gateway edges are extremely sharp, and that's the reason they open and close and they have not a round shape: that way, no one would survive a deathgate. The fact that shadowspawn can't pass through them is just a "plus".


The aim of the deathgate to kill a trolloc is to pass it through the gateway thus killing it in the process... I imagine if a channeler wanted an extremely sharp edge to slice trollocs they can use focused air or anything else. Gateways for that purpose are not cost effective.
Reply to message
An annoying gateway error. rAndy aL - 24/12/2010 04:52:54 AM 2129 Views
Re: An annoying gateway error. Evil_Monkey - 24/12/2010 10:23:23 AM 1344 Views
Re: An annoying gateway error. Lo'oris - 24/12/2010 03:41:10 PM 1164 Views
I dissagree Ashaman Narishma - 24/12/2010 07:09:41 PM 1146 Views
Yes, RJ confirmed that Shadowspawn can't survive gateways. *NM* Lord Haart - 24/12/2010 07:39:02 PM 499 Views
And then BS confirmed that gholam are "more perfected" Shadowspawn which can. *NM* moratcorlm - 24/12/2010 08:35:34 PM 499 Views
Read the post I responded too. I know that. Lord Haart - 26/12/2010 11:58:40 AM 1051 Views
Why would them not being able to survive a gateway be a problem? DREWRULESWOT! - 26/01/2011 05:36:09 AM 863 Views
Re: An annoying gateway error. moratcorlm - 24/12/2010 11:29:33 AM 1076 Views
What he said. No error. *NM* Chas - 24/12/2010 01:01:23 PM 466 Views
"They had not known where-or if-the gholam would attack him" rAndy aL - 25/12/2010 12:27:02 AM 1012 Views
Re: "They had not known where-or if-the gholam would attack him" Skeeve the Great - 25/12/2010 02:05:07 AM 978 Views
They prepared a place, and it just happened to be within walking distance of the attack? rAndy aL - 25/12/2010 09:44:34 AM 954 Views
Please re-read the chapter. It expalins a lot. Skeeve the Great - 25/12/2010 04:05:50 PM 1035 Views
Your quote shows what happened. rAndy aL - 26/12/2010 05:33:44 AM 934 Views
Likely picked from a handful of pre-determined locations based on where and when the attack occurred darius_sedai - 31/12/2010 08:47:20 PM 1005 Views
Perhaps, but I don't think so. ˥ɐ ʎpu∀ɹ - 01/01/2011 01:19:12 AM 831 Views
Not realty. Caemlyn is huge by the standards of the time but realistically it's tiny darius_sedai - 01/01/2011 06:05:06 AM 876 Views
The sizes I proposed are not huge (well, they would be by standards in the middle ages but not now) ˥ɐ ʎpu∀ɹ - 04/01/2011 06:37:50 AM 805 Views
I believe Caemlyn is less than 300k people .... That's what .05% the size of London? darius_sedai - 30/01/2011 06:02:50 PM 857 Views
You aren't seriously comparing modern population densities to medieval ones, are you? *NM* Ghavrel - 30/01/2011 09:23:57 PM 470 Views
Of course not darius_sedai - 30/01/2011 09:30:47 PM 880 Views
That would be an error if it hadn't been Skimming (the platform and what not) they were using. Chas - 25/12/2010 02:29:39 AM 910 Views
It is an error because they opened a skimming gateway to the house (from the skimming place) rAndy aL - 25/12/2010 09:47:08 AM 923 Views
Gateways moratcorlm - 25/12/2010 12:20:13 PM 896 Views
Re: Gateways rAndy aL - 26/12/2010 02:20:14 AM 910 Views
Re: Gateways moratcorlm - 26/12/2010 03:53:05 AM 834 Views
Re: Gateways rAndy aL - 26/12/2010 05:16:48 AM 1052 Views
I'm confused now as to what you're arguing. They knew the location of the house. Chas - 26/12/2010 08:54:17 PM 893 Views
You need to know more than just where you are going rAndy aL - 27/12/2010 06:59:21 AM 917 Views
Please find me a supporting quote in one of the books. Chas - 27/12/2010 12:48:45 PM 927 Views
Re: Please find me a supporting quote in one of the books. Lord Haart - 27/12/2010 03:11:26 PM 841 Views
Skimming Onarishma - 27/12/2010 06:24:12 PM 903 Views
Well, from Encyclopaedia WOT, and aCoS rAndy aL - 28/12/2010 01:02:42 AM 1028 Views
I stand corrected. Though I will say that the uses in the books don't match the definition. Chas - 28/12/2010 02:17:43 PM 978 Views
Not that hard if you think about it darius_sedai - 30/01/2011 09:39:34 PM 960 Views
get over it Japhy - 25/12/2010 06:20:14 PM 865 Views
ok? *NM* rAndy aL - 26/12/2010 02:21:24 AM 519 Views
Re: An annoying gateway error. aven - 24/12/2010 12:22:38 PM 1060 Views
Re: An annoying gateway error. battle_shaman - 24/12/2010 06:22:54 PM 827 Views
Re: An annoying gateway error. Skeeve the Great - 24/12/2010 06:31:38 PM 838 Views
Very good point. Thank you for clearing that up! *NM* Evil_Monkey - 24/12/2010 09:50:47 PM 443 Views
Wrong Cynewulf - 24/12/2010 10:03:26 PM 1008 Views
Re: Wrong MightyYT - 24/12/2010 11:49:12 PM 929 Views
Re: Wrong aven - 25/12/2010 02:59:55 AM 912 Views
Re: Wrong rAndy aL - 25/12/2010 09:51:54 AM 845 Views
Re: Wrong Onarishma - 27/12/2010 06:34:39 PM 924 Views
Re: An annoying gateway error. darius_sedai - 31/12/2010 08:44:17 PM 950 Views
Back to Messageboard Post New Thread Search Help Stats Rules

Reply to Message

Block Quote Paragraph Quote
Formatting
Smiley Codes