Active Users:2035 Time:10/10/2026 01:03:12 PM
An annoying gateway error. rAndy aL Send a noteboard - 24/12/2010 04:52:54 AM
Err... another one.

Mat and Elayne's plan to kill the gholam relied on forcing it through a gateway. Ignoring the question of whether it should be able to survive a gateway or not, there is still a hole in the plan to make the gateway in the first place.

They hoped that the gholam would not notice the gateway if it was opened from "the other side" (in this case, the skimming place). The problem is that the place for this ambush was no pre-planned, so there is no way that one of the Aes Sedai or Kin could have Skimmed to that place.

The plan is broken, but not irrevocably so. All attempts of hiding the gateway by opening it from the other side would have to be abandoned (not that it did any good anyway). Hell, the gholam would probably charge right through a gateway if it saw an Aes Sedai trying to escape through it.
Reply to message
An annoying gateway error. - 24/12/2010 04:52:54 AM 2542 Views
Re: An annoying gateway error. - 24/12/2010 10:23:23 AM 1674 Views
Re: An annoying gateway error. - 24/12/2010 03:41:10 PM 1486 Views
I dissagree - 24/12/2010 07:09:41 PM 1540 Views
Yes, RJ confirmed that Shadowspawn can't survive gateways. *NM* - 24/12/2010 07:39:02 PM 667 Views
And then BS confirmed that gholam are "more perfected" Shadowspawn which can. *NM* - 24/12/2010 08:35:34 PM 663 Views
Read the post I responded too. I know that. - 26/12/2010 11:58:40 AM 1393 Views
Why would them not being able to survive a gateway be a problem? - 26/01/2011 05:36:09 AM 1199 Views
Re: An annoying gateway error. - 24/12/2010 11:29:33 AM 1405 Views
What he said. No error. *NM* - 24/12/2010 01:01:23 PM 633 Views
"They had not known where-or if-the gholam would attack him" - 25/12/2010 12:27:02 AM 1412 Views
Re: "They had not known where-or if-the gholam would attack him" - 25/12/2010 02:05:07 AM 1345 Views
They prepared a place, and it just happened to be within walking distance of the attack? - 25/12/2010 09:44:34 AM 1394 Views
Please re-read the chapter. It expalins a lot. - 25/12/2010 04:05:50 PM 1397 Views
Your quote shows what happened. - 26/12/2010 05:33:44 AM 1340 Views
Likely picked from a handful of pre-determined locations based on where and when the attack occurred - 31/12/2010 08:47:20 PM 1372 Views
Perhaps, but I don't think so. - 01/01/2011 01:19:12 AM 1221 Views
Not realty. Caemlyn is huge by the standards of the time but realistically it's tiny - 01/01/2011 06:05:06 AM 1201 Views
The sizes I proposed are not huge (well, they would be by standards in the middle ages but not now) - 04/01/2011 06:37:50 AM 1129 Views
I believe Caemlyn is less than 300k people .... That's what .05% the size of London? - 30/01/2011 06:02:50 PM 1193 Views
You aren't seriously comparing modern population densities to medieval ones, are you? *NM* - 30/01/2011 09:23:57 PM 636 Views
Of course not - 30/01/2011 09:30:47 PM 1225 Views
That would be an error if it hadn't been Skimming (the platform and what not) they were using. - 25/12/2010 02:29:39 AM 1301 Views
It is an error because they opened a skimming gateway to the house (from the skimming place) - 25/12/2010 09:47:08 AM 1308 Views
Gateways - 25/12/2010 12:20:13 PM 1253 Views
Re: Gateways - 26/12/2010 02:20:14 AM 1345 Views
Re: Gateways - 26/12/2010 03:53:05 AM 1204 Views
Re: Gateways - 26/12/2010 05:16:48 AM 1454 Views
I'm confused now as to what you're arguing. They knew the location of the house. - 26/12/2010 08:54:17 PM 1288 Views
You need to know more than just where you are going - 27/12/2010 06:59:21 AM 1356 Views
Please find me a supporting quote in one of the books. - 27/12/2010 12:48:45 PM 1326 Views
Re: Please find me a supporting quote in one of the books. - 27/12/2010 03:11:26 PM 1187 Views
Skimming - 27/12/2010 06:24:12 PM 1289 Views
Well, from Encyclopaedia WOT, and aCoS - 28/12/2010 01:02:42 AM 1538 Views
Not that hard if you think about it - 30/01/2011 09:39:34 PM 1346 Views
get over it - 25/12/2010 06:20:14 PM 1200 Views
ok? *NM* - 26/12/2010 02:21:24 AM 744 Views
Re: An annoying gateway error. - 24/12/2010 12:22:38 PM 1399 Views
Re: An annoying gateway error. - 24/12/2010 06:22:54 PM 1164 Views
Re: An annoying gateway error. - 24/12/2010 06:31:38 PM 1206 Views
Very good point. Thank you for clearing that up! *NM* - 24/12/2010 09:50:47 PM 608 Views
Wrong - 24/12/2010 10:03:26 PM 1385 Views
Re: Wrong - 24/12/2010 11:49:12 PM 1371 Views
Re: Wrong - 25/12/2010 02:59:55 AM 1283 Views
Re: Wrong - 25/12/2010 09:51:54 AM 1281 Views
Re: Wrong - 27/12/2010 06:34:39 PM 1225 Views
Re: An annoying gateway error. - 31/12/2010 08:44:17 PM 1287 Views

Reply to Message