Active Users:364 Time:16/05/2024 10:47:48 PM
Of course not darius_sedai Send a noteboard - 30/01/2011 09:30:47 PM
What I'm saying is that in a city such as Caemlyn where Mat could preset the parameters it would have been simple to find a handful of locations in a specific part of the city to have the gateway made. The population density has nothing to do with what I'm getting at ... Only that Caemlyn, while large by it's standards is still geographically and population wise small enough for Mat's plan to be easily orchestrated.

The previous poster used London as an example which is why I made the comparison ....
Domani Drag Queen in the White Tower ... Aran'gar watch out!
Reply to message
An annoying gateway error. - 24/12/2010 04:52:54 AM 1961 Views
Re: An annoying gateway error. - 24/12/2010 10:23:23 AM 1160 Views
Re: An annoying gateway error. - 24/12/2010 03:41:10 PM 1003 Views
I dissagree - 24/12/2010 07:09:41 PM 965 Views
Yes, RJ confirmed that Shadowspawn can't survive gateways. *NM* - 24/12/2010 07:39:02 PM 404 Views
And then BS confirmed that gholam are "more perfected" Shadowspawn which can. *NM* - 24/12/2010 08:35:34 PM 428 Views
Read the post I responded too. I know that. - 26/12/2010 11:58:40 AM 867 Views
Why would them not being able to survive a gateway be a problem? - 26/01/2011 05:36:09 AM 702 Views
Re: An annoying gateway error. - 24/12/2010 11:29:33 AM 923 Views
What he said. No error. *NM* - 24/12/2010 01:01:23 PM 401 Views
"They had not known where-or if-the gholam would attack him" - 25/12/2010 12:27:02 AM 806 Views
Re: "They had not known where-or if-the gholam would attack him" - 25/12/2010 02:05:07 AM 820 Views
They prepared a place, and it just happened to be within walking distance of the attack? - 25/12/2010 09:44:34 AM 798 Views
Please re-read the chapter. It expalins a lot. - 25/12/2010 04:05:50 PM 839 Views
Your quote shows what happened. - 26/12/2010 05:33:44 AM 766 Views
Likely picked from a handful of pre-determined locations based on where and when the attack occurred - 31/12/2010 08:47:20 PM 800 Views
Perhaps, but I don't think so. - 01/01/2011 01:19:12 AM 653 Views
Not realty. Caemlyn is huge by the standards of the time but realistically it's tiny - 01/01/2011 06:05:06 AM 702 Views
The sizes I proposed are not huge (well, they would be by standards in the middle ages but not now) - 04/01/2011 06:37:50 AM 636 Views
I believe Caemlyn is less than 300k people .... That's what .05% the size of London? - 30/01/2011 06:02:50 PM 684 Views
You aren't seriously comparing modern population densities to medieval ones, are you? *NM* - 30/01/2011 09:23:57 PM 407 Views
Of course not - 30/01/2011 09:30:47 PM 722 Views
That would be an error if it hadn't been Skimming (the platform and what not) they were using. - 25/12/2010 02:29:39 AM 741 Views
It is an error because they opened a skimming gateway to the house (from the skimming place) - 25/12/2010 09:47:08 AM 743 Views
Gateways - 25/12/2010 12:20:13 PM 747 Views
Re: Gateways - 26/12/2010 02:20:14 AM 736 Views
Re: Gateways - 26/12/2010 03:53:05 AM 666 Views
Re: Gateways - 26/12/2010 05:16:48 AM 872 Views
I'm confused now as to what you're arguing. They knew the location of the house. - 26/12/2010 08:54:17 PM 731 Views
You need to know more than just where you are going - 27/12/2010 06:59:21 AM 756 Views
Please find me a supporting quote in one of the books. - 27/12/2010 12:48:45 PM 760 Views
Re: Please find me a supporting quote in one of the books. - 27/12/2010 03:11:26 PM 654 Views
Skimming - 27/12/2010 06:24:12 PM 738 Views
Well, from Encyclopaedia WOT, and aCoS - 28/12/2010 01:02:42 AM 841 Views
Not that hard if you think about it - 30/01/2011 09:39:34 PM 800 Views
get over it - 25/12/2010 06:20:14 PM 687 Views
ok? *NM* - 26/12/2010 02:21:24 AM 427 Views
Re: An annoying gateway error. - 24/12/2010 12:22:38 PM 858 Views
Re: An annoying gateway error. - 24/12/2010 06:22:54 PM 672 Views
Re: An annoying gateway error. - 24/12/2010 06:31:38 PM 669 Views
Very good point. Thank you for clearing that up! *NM* - 24/12/2010 09:50:47 PM 365 Views
Wrong - 24/12/2010 10:03:26 PM 846 Views
Re: Wrong - 24/12/2010 11:49:12 PM 768 Views
Re: Wrong - 25/12/2010 02:59:55 AM 742 Views
Re: Wrong - 25/12/2010 09:51:54 AM 674 Views
Re: Wrong - 27/12/2010 06:34:39 PM 764 Views
Re: An annoying gateway error. - 31/12/2010 08:44:17 PM 774 Views

Reply to Message