Active Users:2036 Time:10/10/2026 01:02:52 PM
Well, from Encyclopaedia WOT, and aCoS rAndy aL Send a noteboard - 28/12/2010 01:02:42 AM
Skimming
The ability to open a gateway to a dark dimension (not well defined or understood), move through that dimension, and open another gateway back into the real world in a different location. First mention is TFoH,Ch6. Anyone of sufficient strength and knowledge can Skim. Skimming requires detailed knowledge of the place one is Skimming to. Skimming was not even known as a lost Talent. (ACoS,Ch9)
-Encyclopaedia Wot - Talents

What Egwene had pried from Moghedien was a way to journey from a place you did not know well to one you did. Slower than Traveling, Skimming was not even one of the lost Telents...
-A Crown of Swords - Ch9, p186



There would be more in The Fires of Heaven when Asmo was explaining things to Rand.
This message last edited by rAndy aL on 28/12/2010 at 01:03:12 AM
Reply to message
An annoying gateway error. - 24/12/2010 04:52:54 AM 2541 Views
Re: An annoying gateway error. - 24/12/2010 10:23:23 AM 1674 Views
Re: An annoying gateway error. - 24/12/2010 03:41:10 PM 1486 Views
I dissagree - 24/12/2010 07:09:41 PM 1540 Views
Yes, RJ confirmed that Shadowspawn can't survive gateways. *NM* - 24/12/2010 07:39:02 PM 667 Views
And then BS confirmed that gholam are "more perfected" Shadowspawn which can. *NM* - 24/12/2010 08:35:34 PM 663 Views
Read the post I responded too. I know that. - 26/12/2010 11:58:40 AM 1393 Views
Why would them not being able to survive a gateway be a problem? - 26/01/2011 05:36:09 AM 1199 Views
Re: An annoying gateway error. - 24/12/2010 11:29:33 AM 1405 Views
What he said. No error. *NM* - 24/12/2010 01:01:23 PM 633 Views
"They had not known where-or if-the gholam would attack him" - 25/12/2010 12:27:02 AM 1412 Views
Re: "They had not known where-or if-the gholam would attack him" - 25/12/2010 02:05:07 AM 1345 Views
They prepared a place, and it just happened to be within walking distance of the attack? - 25/12/2010 09:44:34 AM 1394 Views
Please re-read the chapter. It expalins a lot. - 25/12/2010 04:05:50 PM 1396 Views
Your quote shows what happened. - 26/12/2010 05:33:44 AM 1340 Views
Likely picked from a handful of pre-determined locations based on where and when the attack occurred - 31/12/2010 08:47:20 PM 1371 Views
Perhaps, but I don't think so. - 01/01/2011 01:19:12 AM 1221 Views
Not realty. Caemlyn is huge by the standards of the time but realistically it's tiny - 01/01/2011 06:05:06 AM 1201 Views
The sizes I proposed are not huge (well, they would be by standards in the middle ages but not now) - 04/01/2011 06:37:50 AM 1129 Views
I believe Caemlyn is less than 300k people .... That's what .05% the size of London? - 30/01/2011 06:02:50 PM 1193 Views
You aren't seriously comparing modern population densities to medieval ones, are you? *NM* - 30/01/2011 09:23:57 PM 635 Views
Of course not - 30/01/2011 09:30:47 PM 1225 Views
That would be an error if it hadn't been Skimming (the platform and what not) they were using. - 25/12/2010 02:29:39 AM 1300 Views
It is an error because they opened a skimming gateway to the house (from the skimming place) - 25/12/2010 09:47:08 AM 1308 Views
Gateways - 25/12/2010 12:20:13 PM 1253 Views
Re: Gateways - 26/12/2010 02:20:14 AM 1345 Views
Re: Gateways - 26/12/2010 03:53:05 AM 1204 Views
Re: Gateways - 26/12/2010 05:16:48 AM 1454 Views
I'm confused now as to what you're arguing. They knew the location of the house. - 26/12/2010 08:54:17 PM 1288 Views
You need to know more than just where you are going - 27/12/2010 06:59:21 AM 1356 Views
Please find me a supporting quote in one of the books. - 27/12/2010 12:48:45 PM 1326 Views
Re: Please find me a supporting quote in one of the books. - 27/12/2010 03:11:26 PM 1187 Views
Skimming - 27/12/2010 06:24:12 PM 1289 Views
Well, from Encyclopaedia WOT, and aCoS - 28/12/2010 01:02:42 AM 1538 Views
Not that hard if you think about it - 30/01/2011 09:39:34 PM 1346 Views
get over it - 25/12/2010 06:20:14 PM 1200 Views
ok? *NM* - 26/12/2010 02:21:24 AM 744 Views
Re: An annoying gateway error. - 24/12/2010 12:22:38 PM 1399 Views
Re: An annoying gateway error. - 24/12/2010 06:22:54 PM 1164 Views
Re: An annoying gateway error. - 24/12/2010 06:31:38 PM 1206 Views
Very good point. Thank you for clearing that up! *NM* - 24/12/2010 09:50:47 PM 608 Views
Wrong - 24/12/2010 10:03:26 PM 1385 Views
Re: Wrong - 24/12/2010 11:49:12 PM 1371 Views
Re: Wrong - 25/12/2010 02:59:55 AM 1283 Views
Re: Wrong - 25/12/2010 09:51:54 AM 1281 Views
Re: Wrong - 27/12/2010 06:34:39 PM 1225 Views
Re: An annoying gateway error. - 31/12/2010 08:44:17 PM 1287 Views

Reply to Message