Active Users:545 Time:19/09/2025 12:33:41 AM
Nope. Lord Haart Send a noteboard - 24/12/2010 07:44:37 PM
"He has to be there, or else something bad will happen" clearly implies that Perrin's presence must be required. Rand was not at all affected by Perrin on Dragonmount. To begin with, Perrin was in T'A'R while Rand was in the real world, so that's a huge barrier.

If Perrin had actually touched Rand, or had reached out to him mentally, that would be one thing, but it seems clear that he was there as an observer so we could see something amazing happen (and so that Perrin would know to trust Rand).
Reply to message
Second time Perrin must be there for Rand vs Two times Aes Sedai may hurt him - 22/12/2010 10:29:49 PM 1944 Views
I see a stampede of Egwene apologists on the way *NM* - 23/12/2010 01:03:56 AM 505 Views
I just want to point out.. - 23/12/2010 01:18:29 AM 1044 Views
Re: I just want to point out.. - 23/12/2010 06:51:05 AM 893 Views
- 28/12/2010 01:16:20 PM 709 Views
I'm still of the opinion that Rand is headed towards the same disaster LTT did - 04/01/2011 06:42:51 PM 762 Views
I think they're both partially right... - 05/01/2011 11:16:21 AM 703 Views
Er no - 23/12/2010 12:22:04 PM 952 Views
The viewing says "women who can channel" - 23/12/2010 04:13:29 PM 856 Views
The second one isn't connected. - 23/12/2010 05:16:30 PM 1078 Views
nail on the head *NM* - 24/12/2010 01:27:41 AM 386 Views
Re: The second one isn't connected. - 24/12/2010 05:29:16 AM 956 Views
Re: The second one isn't connected. - 24/12/2010 11:32:59 AM 774 Views
Re: The second one isn't connected. - 24/12/2010 06:06:04 PM 786 Views
Nope. - 24/12/2010 07:44:37 PM 761 Views
Re: Nope. - 24/12/2010 08:16:25 PM 793 Views
Re: Nope. - 26/12/2010 03:22:38 PM 865 Views
I agree. - 18/01/2011 06:21:43 PM 745 Views
+1 - 19/01/2011 01:46:39 AM 802 Views

Reply to Message