Active Users:382 Time:01/05/2025 06:06:15 PM
Nope. Lord Haart Send a noteboard - 24/12/2010 07:44:37 PM
"He has to be there, or else something bad will happen" clearly implies that Perrin's presence must be required. Rand was not at all affected by Perrin on Dragonmount. To begin with, Perrin was in T'A'R while Rand was in the real world, so that's a huge barrier.

If Perrin had actually touched Rand, or had reached out to him mentally, that would be one thing, but it seems clear that he was there as an observer so we could see something amazing happen (and so that Perrin would know to trust Rand).
Reply to message
Second time Perrin must be there for Rand vs Two times Aes Sedai may hurt him - 22/12/2010 10:29:49 PM 1883 Views
I see a stampede of Egwene apologists on the way *NM* - 23/12/2010 01:03:56 AM 470 Views
I just want to point out.. - 23/12/2010 01:18:29 AM 982 Views
Re: I just want to point out.. - 23/12/2010 06:51:05 AM 833 Views
- 28/12/2010 01:16:20 PM 649 Views
I'm still of the opinion that Rand is headed towards the same disaster LTT did - 04/01/2011 06:42:51 PM 704 Views
I think they're both partially right... - 05/01/2011 11:16:21 AM 648 Views
Er no - 23/12/2010 12:22:04 PM 893 Views
The viewing says "women who can channel" - 23/12/2010 04:13:29 PM 799 Views
The second one isn't connected. - 23/12/2010 05:16:30 PM 1011 Views
nail on the head *NM* - 24/12/2010 01:27:41 AM 353 Views
Re: The second one isn't connected. - 24/12/2010 05:29:16 AM 897 Views
Re: The second one isn't connected. - 24/12/2010 11:32:59 AM 717 Views
Re: The second one isn't connected. - 24/12/2010 06:06:04 PM 724 Views
Nope. - 24/12/2010 07:44:37 PM 697 Views
Re: Nope. - 24/12/2010 08:16:25 PM 734 Views
Re: Nope. - 26/12/2010 03:22:38 PM 804 Views
I agree. - 18/01/2011 06:21:43 PM 685 Views
+1 - 19/01/2011 01:46:39 AM 747 Views

Reply to Message