Active Users:307 Time:15/05/2024 10:51:27 AM
Re: I don't think so Watcher Send a noteboard - 08/05/2011 03:09:29 PM
Making Ter'angreal may not be the same as making angreal etc. The guide and other sources tell us that ter'angreal were quite common as most of the AoL infastructure was powered by the One Power and as such most of the machines were effectivly ter'angreal. Angreal and Sa'angreal were considered more rare so its not too much of a stretch to say that it took a lot more effort and resources to make them.

Secondly you mention Cuendillar being made relativly easily by the current generation of Aes Sedai. Just because its easy to make is not the same as it being a good idea to make them. No one among the current AS have raised the issue of is there any long term consequences to making lots and lots of Cuendillar?

I have always wondered if in making heartstone the channeler takes some of the OP and locks it up in the object created. How else could it be virtually indestructible unless the OP is constantly renewing it. If that were to be right making too many items could weaken the amount of OP available for Channelers to access not to mention effecting the turning of the wheel.

The way I see it both sides probably started off with a lot of cool toys but as RJ said the ability to travel left large aress devistated as there were not fixed battle lines. The infastructure to make cool items like shock lances broke down and they became harder and harder to make. Those already is existance could be damanged or destroyed in battle and it was harder and harder to replace them. The same could go for angreal & Sa'angreal so that by the time of the Strike having angreal was very important as there would not be enough to go around.

The forsaken being the forsaken probably meant that they all had angreal but they would have to give some to their soliders as well to offset those used by LTT's forces.

I don't think pride would come into it or admiting weakness by wearing openly angreal. The way I see it the Forsaken would flaunt their respective firepower to keep enemies/rivals at bay but from what we know of the DO he could well have ordered no angreal near SG.
Reply to message
How come every Forsaken wasn’t loaded with angreal when they were sealed in the Bore? - 07/05/2011 02:35:18 AM 2167 Views
Several reasons exist - 07/05/2011 08:49:41 AM 1195 Views
Re: Several reasons exist - 07/05/2011 03:09:51 PM 1068 Views
Re: Several reasons exist - 07/05/2011 04:29:39 PM 1081 Views
No - 07/05/2011 08:36:49 PM 856 Views
Re: No - 07/05/2011 09:16:18 PM 856 Views
Or another question - 07/05/2011 04:07:31 PM 905 Views
Re: Or another question - 07/05/2011 04:24:21 PM 992 Views
Which would be a shame. - 09/05/2011 08:17:23 PM 844 Views
There's no reason to pack heat for a meeting at SG - 07/05/2011 06:08:53 PM 1077 Views
Re: There's no reason to pack heat for a meeting at SG - 07/05/2011 06:23:14 PM 876 Views
Yeah, but - 07/05/2011 07:30:45 PM 875 Views
They probably left them all at home.. .and not by choice... - 07/05/2011 08:48:50 PM 1086 Views
Re: They probably left them all at home.. .and not by choice... - 07/05/2011 09:54:11 PM 961 Views
Re: They probably left them all at home.. .and not by choice... - 08/05/2011 05:48:01 PM 868 Views
Uh whatever! - 11/05/2011 07:35:54 AM 1256 Views
Re: Uh whatever! - 11/05/2011 10:02:40 AM 1014 Views
Meet malekithe. - 11/05/2011 08:06:01 PM 904 Views
Meet Cannoli - 18/05/2011 07:47:46 AM 1205 Views
Re: Meet Cannoli - 19/05/2011 01:45:03 PM 1154 Views
Whatever whatever! - 18/05/2011 07:43:31 AM 1016 Views
But the Dark One could control what the One Power did in Shayol Ghul - 11/05/2011 07:14:43 PM 897 Views
it could also be that he told them to, because he could. - 11/05/2011 10:18:34 PM 886 Views
Re: it could also be that he told them to, because he could. - 11/05/2011 11:50:27 PM 838 Views
I was under impression they weren't very aware of the "destroying reality" part - 12/05/2011 06:06:56 AM 814 Views
yep (on both) *NM* - 12/05/2011 08:37:59 AM 457 Views
I think they were at least in some part - 12/05/2011 04:15:26 PM 753 Views
RJ stuffed up... - 08/05/2011 02:13:15 PM 970 Views
Re: I don't think so - 08/05/2011 03:09:29 PM 1052 Views
Good points - 08/05/2011 03:13:57 PM 853 Views
well, given that we don't really KNOW how Cuendillar was made... - 09/05/2011 06:11:32 AM 914 Views
Do we really *know* that cuendiar is indestructble? - 10/05/2011 02:46:49 PM 878 Views
We don't, although simplicity=/=weakness. Another scenario - 10/05/2011 07:08:57 PM 763 Views
Sort of - 11/05/2011 07:49:10 AM 1179 Views
Re: RJ stuffed up... - 08/05/2011 03:14:20 PM 907 Views
Not plastic, more like electronics. - 11/05/2011 03:26:53 PM 981 Views
I missed this post, it's very well thought! *NM* - 19/05/2011 11:26:00 AM 520 Views
my personal theory with other thoughts - 09/05/2011 08:10:34 PM 929 Views
Re: my personal theory with other thoughts - 10/05/2011 02:10:13 AM 913 Views
Re: my personal theory with other thoughts - 10/05/2011 08:07:50 AM 845 Views
Some people would. - 11/05/2011 02:42:25 PM 882 Views
Re: Some people would. - 11/05/2011 03:01:01 PM 775 Views
It definitely wasn't common. - 11/05/2011 03:45:45 PM 922 Views
Re: It definitely wasn't common. - 11/05/2011 04:03:15 PM 754 Views
and if you had prophesy??? *NM* - 04/06/2011 03:10:40 AM 542 Views
My personal theory is that angreal and sa'angreal require Circles of male and female channelers - 11/05/2011 07:24:34 PM 847 Views
makes sense *NM* - 12/05/2011 08:36:08 AM 472 Views
Er, though - - 16/05/2011 06:08:55 PM 821 Views
Re: Er, though - - 17/05/2011 12:38:14 PM 753 Views
Don't think so - 17/05/2011 01:09:36 PM 928 Views
Re: Don't think so - 17/05/2011 01:15:53 PM 773 Views
I imagine they could - 17/05/2011 01:45:03 PM 859 Views
Re: I imagine they could - 17/05/2011 01:49:53 PM 812 Views
That makes sense - 17/05/2011 02:16:05 PM 851 Views
Re: That makes sense - 17/05/2011 03:46:04 PM 754 Views
Re: That makes sense - 17/05/2011 04:21:11 PM 776 Views
Re: That makes sense - 18/05/2011 01:18:43 PM 800 Views
That scene was weird - 18/05/2011 02:37:44 PM 781 Views
Re: That scene was weird - 19/05/2011 10:41:59 AM 772 Views

Reply to Message