Active Users:401 Time:08/09/2026 07:09:18 PM
Why do you always think Strength is the point darius_sedai Send a noteboard - 03/11/2012 04:35:26 PM
Lanfear at 10% more than Moiraine would still be vastly more powerful than Moiraine due to training. You cheapen the Forsaken by making their power all about their Strength. And you ignore the text which tells us over and over how worthless strength really is when compared to training. Even Moghedien states it and she is the only one of the Forsaken who even seems to notice Strength unless they are surprised.

Cyndane v. Alivia is all I need from the books to see that strength is irrelevant in the grand scheme. Egwene couldn't match any Forsaken when she makes the statement, but a few books later she says out right that she could face Mesaana, she's probably grown a bit in strength in the interim, but she's also learned an amazing amount about the Power as we see throughout the book. She knows the general level of these women and would not be able to say that out loud if she did not believe it. I know you will next pull out the quote about "the woman was so strong" from the TAR battle, which is NOT about OP strength, it's a comment on Mesaana's mind in TAR. There wasnt even a mention of Mesaana using the OP in that encounter, just her will.

Believe all you like that Lanfear is 500% every other Channeler ... Personally I think that makes the character even more boring. The books are more interesting to me if the main characters can actually stand a chance against the evil characters. Your Lanfear fanboy beliefs would make the series unbelievably dull to me.

Pevara being strong even for a man just strengthens my belief that the Forsaken are not that much stronger than the top level AS.

Anyway, I'm not going to continue to re hash the same conversation we've been having for years without a significant body of new quotes. All we'll end up doing is pulling the same ones that have been around for 20 years :)
Domani Drag Queen in the White Tower ... Aran'gar watch out!
Reply to message
Addressing problems with the Bell Curve - 31/10/2012 11:30:42 AM 1826 Views
Who said RJ created a 100 point scale? I always assumed we did to make this easier to follow - 31/10/2012 02:22:51 PM 1140 Views
One more point here - 31/10/2012 03:02:34 PM 1018 Views
I've think I've finally done it. I've solved the entire Curve. Daigian is the key... - 01/11/2012 09:20:57 AM 1305 Views
Did some playing with your numbers to make this work better - 01/11/2012 02:13:00 PM 1241 Views
The Mean and SD are set by Daigian's position. Your options are therefore not possible... - 02/11/2012 07:49:24 AM 1221 Views
Yet you have many more SD between the Mean and Lanfear than you do Morgase and the Mean - 02/11/2012 02:39:51 PM 1017 Views
I absolutely agree. The lower side of the curve MUST be intersected by zero after 1 SD... - 02/11/2012 03:03:52 PM 922 Views
I am not convinced Moiraine is the Mean. Merely 50% of Lanfear - 02/11/2012 04:23:57 PM 1103 Views
But on a Bell Curve the Mean IS 50% of Lanfear. You've just disproven your own contention. - 02/11/2012 04:40:31 PM 989 Views
OMG no it is NOT! - 02/11/2012 05:16:36 PM 920 Views
I agree with that. But please honestly look at the math I presented. It disproves the Bell Curve. - 02/11/2012 05:24:41 PM 1217 Views
It doesn't matter that you think the BC is disproved. - 02/11/2012 06:07:19 PM 1039 Views
Confusing post... - 02/11/2012 06:30:40 PM 1117 Views
Dreadlord is essentially describing a lognormal distribution - 02/11/2012 07:21:39 PM 967 Views
If you choose to ignore the author go right ahead. I just think you are wrong - 02/11/2012 09:05:14 PM 1110 Views
A non-linear 21 point scale is fine... - 02/11/2012 11:02:48 PM 1200 Views
I've been operating off of the scale I described for years - 02/11/2012 11:25:27 PM 1063 Views
Re: It doesn't matter that you think the BC is disproved. - 02/11/2012 07:11:57 PM 1074 Views
Not true - 02/11/2012 08:52:42 PM 1100 Views
Re: Not true - 03/11/2012 09:19:11 AM 1090 Views
Read my other posts - 03/11/2012 04:19:15 PM 886 Views
Not quite - 03/11/2012 08:02:05 AM 1073 Views
I think it's about skill not strength - 03/11/2012 04:38:07 PM 882 Views
I think the number is about 10 - 03/11/2012 08:42:08 AM 1106 Views
Nope - 03/11/2012 04:14:45 PM 1043 Views
Re: Nope - 03/11/2012 04:39:07 PM 1063 Views
Verin and Graendal each have angreal of unkown strength - 03/11/2012 06:15:49 PM 1064 Views
Re: Verin and Graendal each have angreal of unkown strength - 03/11/2012 10:15:10 PM 1062 Views
*shrugs* - 03/11/2012 10:25:18 PM 960 Views
Re: *shrugs* - 04/11/2012 07:12:21 AM 1151 Views
You have 4 markers and you should use them all - 10/11/2012 03:08:37 PM 886 Views
Indeed - 10/11/2012 03:59:51 PM 1044 Views
Re: Addressing problems with the Bell Curve - 01/11/2012 06:23:07 PM 1077 Views
Re: Addressing problems with the Bell Curve - 01/11/2012 09:48:04 PM 1048 Views
Re: Addressing problems with the Bell Curve - 02/11/2012 09:02:58 PM 1065 Views
Re: Addressing problems with the Bell Curve - 02/11/2012 09:56:50 PM 1133 Views
I'll have to disagree with much of this - 03/11/2012 07:46:31 AM 1123 Views
Why do you always think Strength is the point - 03/11/2012 04:35:26 PM 861 Views
I don't - I merely appreciate it as a factor - 03/11/2012 04:48:24 PM 968 Views
0 Evidence? Cyndane v. Alivia is plenty of evidence EDIT with exact quote - 03/11/2012 06:17:39 PM 1022 Views
One other thing you have forgotten about - 03/11/2012 10:13:09 PM 965 Views
Your agenda blinds you to logic yet again...As I'll simply demonstrate with your example here... - 03/11/2012 11:08:13 PM 1019 Views
Nope, the only experience she has in reality is against Rand - 03/11/2012 11:09:54 PM 926 Views
Nonsense. - 03/11/2012 11:11:05 PM 963 Views
Believe as you will - 03/11/2012 11:26:50 PM 1101 Views
That's a classic. - 04/11/2012 12:06:13 AM 1002 Views
You misquote on a regular basis and have no grasp of the timeline in the series - 04/11/2012 01:36:37 AM 877 Views
Hmm... - 04/11/2012 07:08:04 AM 1207 Views
stop getting all indignant ... I'm really not trying to be nasty to you - 04/11/2012 04:20:06 PM 1013 Views

Reply to Message