There were glimmers here and there afterwards (the Cleansing for instance), but for the most part, all of the memorable stuff went down in the first six books.
Don't get me wrong, I like Sanderson's books....its just that he is no RJ. His trilogy broke some major rules, and really just kind of....dribbled off. Sure, it wasn't the close to the story that I wanted, but then the author I wanted to end it died. It would be much akin to "The Return of the King" being done by someone else.
As for being removed from Canon-status...I'm not sure. It's not like they are Fanfic or something. They are published with the full approval (and even involvement) of his writing/publishing team....and his notes.
~Jeordam
ex-Admin at wotmania (all things wot & art galleries)
Saving the Princess, Humanity, or the World-Entire since 1985
Saving the Princess, Humanity, or the World-Entire since 1985
Should the last three books be officially removed from Canon?
- 17/01/2014 08:31:08 AM
1531 Views
The first six books were fantastic
- 17/01/2014 07:22:28 PM
892 Views
Why does anybody care?
- 18/01/2014 05:05:32 AM
953 Views
Or to put it another way, I agree with beetnemesis. *NM*
- 18/01/2014 05:06:14 AM
502 Views
See how easy that is to say? You should have that attitude over in Mafia... *NM*
- 20/01/2014 04:02:06 AM
369 Views
I can see the argument, but in general, no.
- 18/01/2014 08:37:43 PM
858 Views
I would remove the last few RJ books from Canon, before BS' trilogy.....
- 20/01/2014 04:13:03 AM
889 Views
They're not the books RJ would've written but striking them from canon is ridiculous at every level *NM*
- 28/01/2014 07:13:46 AM
391 Views
The very notion that any of the series was important enough to discuss this is absurd.
- 29/01/2014 09:50:06 PM
772 Views