Active Users:1110 Time:07/05/2026 07:46:40 PM
Why does anybody care? Fanatic-Templar Send a noteboard - 18/01/2014 05:05:32 AM

I ignore things I don't like from canon all the time. It'd only be relevant if we were expecting some kind of sequel and wanted to make sure that material wasn't included, but given that this is a completed work, it doesn't change anything to anything.

The first rule of being a ninja is "do no harm". Unless you intend to do harm, then do lots of harm.
~Master Splinter

Victorious in Bergioyn's legendary 'Reverse Mafia'. *MySmiley*
Reply to message
Should the last three books be officially removed from Canon? - 17/01/2014 08:31:08 AM 2006 Views
The first six books were fantastic - 17/01/2014 07:22:28 PM 1393 Views
...this is dumb *NM* - 17/01/2014 08:55:32 PM 759 Views
+1 *NM* - 18/01/2014 03:56:32 PM 709 Views
+1 *NM* - 21/01/2014 07:50:30 PM 716 Views
+1 *NM* - 19/03/2014 04:17:18 AM 686 Views
The final post in the brief discussion there says it all. - 17/01/2014 09:59:17 PM 1631 Views
Why does anybody care? - 18/01/2014 05:05:32 AM 1652 Views
Or to put it another way, I agree with beetnemesis. *NM* - 18/01/2014 05:06:14 AM 897 Views
Dumb - 18/01/2014 01:53:42 PM 1192 Views
I can see the argument, but in general, no. - 18/01/2014 08:37:43 PM 1354 Views
If anything, I think BS was more aware of Egwene's flaws - 20/01/2014 04:00:24 AM 1323 Views
That's Cannoli's point. - 21/01/2014 07:55:07 PM 1209 Views
This just makes me sad all over again. - 19/01/2014 01:55:08 AM 1339 Views
I would remove the last few RJ books from Canon, before BS' trilogy..... - 20/01/2014 04:13:03 AM 1396 Views
+1 *NM* - 21/01/2014 07:50:14 PM 662 Views
Heartily agreed. *NM* - 29/01/2014 09:50:41 PM 690 Views
No, whatever most of the people here say - they're good! *NM* - 28/01/2014 05:44:49 AM 743 Views

Reply to Message