Active Users:338 Time:29/04/2024 04:03:39 AM
Why does anybody care? Fanatic-Templar Send a noteboard - 18/01/2014 05:05:32 AM

I ignore things I don't like from canon all the time. It'd only be relevant if we were expecting some kind of sequel and wanted to make sure that material wasn't included, but given that this is a completed work, it doesn't change anything to anything.

The first rule of being a ninja is "do no harm". Unless you intend to do harm, then do lots of harm.
~Master Splinter

Victorious in Bergioyn's legendary 'Reverse Mafia'. *MySmiley*
Reply to message
Should the last three books be officially removed from Canon? - 17/01/2014 08:31:08 AM 1534 Views
The first six books were fantastic - 17/01/2014 07:22:28 PM 897 Views
...this is dumb *NM* - 17/01/2014 08:55:32 PM 380 Views
+1 *NM* - 18/01/2014 03:56:32 PM 416 Views
+1 *NM* - 21/01/2014 07:50:30 PM 388 Views
+1 *NM* - 19/03/2014 04:17:18 AM 386 Views
The final post in the brief discussion there says it all. - 17/01/2014 09:59:17 PM 1042 Views
Why does anybody care? - 18/01/2014 05:05:32 AM 963 Views
Or to put it another way, I agree with beetnemesis. *NM* - 18/01/2014 05:06:14 AM 509 Views
Dumb - 18/01/2014 01:53:42 PM 721 Views
I can see the argument, but in general, no. - 18/01/2014 08:37:43 PM 861 Views
If anything, I think BS was more aware of Egwene's flaws - 20/01/2014 04:00:24 AM 843 Views
That's Cannoli's point. - 21/01/2014 07:55:07 PM 707 Views
This just makes me sad all over again. - 19/01/2014 01:55:08 AM 762 Views
I would remove the last few RJ books from Canon, before BS' trilogy..... - 20/01/2014 04:13:03 AM 893 Views
+1 *NM* - 21/01/2014 07:50:14 PM 398 Views
Heartily agreed. *NM* - 29/01/2014 09:50:41 PM 410 Views
No, whatever most of the people here say - they're good! *NM* - 28/01/2014 05:44:49 AM 454 Views

Reply to Message