Active Users:1744 Time:22/09/2026 04:54:12 AM
Why does anybody care? Fanatic-Templar Send a noteboard - 18/01/2014 05:05:32 AM

I ignore things I don't like from canon all the time. It'd only be relevant if we were expecting some kind of sequel and wanted to make sure that material wasn't included, but given that this is a completed work, it doesn't change anything to anything.

The first rule of being a ninja is "do no harm". Unless you intend to do harm, then do lots of harm.
~Master Splinter

Victorious in Bergioyn's legendary 'Reverse Mafia'. *MySmiley*
Reply to message
Should the last three books be officially removed from Canon? - 17/01/2014 08:31:08 AM 2074 Views
The first six books were fantastic - 17/01/2014 07:22:28 PM 1469 Views
...this is dumb *NM* - 17/01/2014 08:55:32 PM 797 Views
+1 *NM* - 18/01/2014 03:56:32 PM 749 Views
+1 *NM* - 21/01/2014 07:50:30 PM 751 Views
+1 *NM* - 19/03/2014 04:17:18 AM 730 Views
The final post in the brief discussion there says it all. - 17/01/2014 09:59:17 PM 1713 Views
Why does anybody care? - 18/01/2014 05:05:32 AM 1725 Views
Or to put it another way, I agree with beetnemesis. *NM* - 18/01/2014 05:06:14 AM 940 Views
Dumb - 18/01/2014 01:53:42 PM 1265 Views
I can see the argument, but in general, no. - 18/01/2014 08:37:43 PM 1419 Views
If anything, I think BS was more aware of Egwene's flaws - 20/01/2014 04:00:24 AM 1393 Views
That's Cannoli's point. - 21/01/2014 07:55:07 PM 1285 Views
This just makes me sad all over again. - 19/01/2014 01:55:08 AM 1408 Views
I would remove the last few RJ books from Canon, before BS' trilogy..... - 20/01/2014 04:13:03 AM 1465 Views
+1 *NM* - 21/01/2014 07:50:14 PM 700 Views
Heartily agreed. *NM* - 29/01/2014 09:50:41 PM 728 Views
No, whatever most of the people here say - they're good! *NM* - 28/01/2014 05:44:49 AM 782 Views

Reply to Message