Active Users:1115 Time:03/08/2026 07:09:04 PM
That's Cannoli's point. Nargs Send a noteboard - 21/01/2014 07:55:07 PM

You might really believe that but Egwene was a creation of Jordan's mind. To say BS knows her better than RJ did is... well, BS.

Any character flaws that RJ conveyed SHOULD have more weight than any flaws or supposed redeeming characteristics that BS conveyed.

Reply to message
Should the last three books be officially removed from Canon? - 17/01/2014 08:31:08 AM 2036 Views
The first six books were fantastic - 17/01/2014 07:22:28 PM 1426 Views
...this is dumb *NM* - 17/01/2014 08:55:32 PM 781 Views
+1 *NM* - 18/01/2014 03:56:32 PM 733 Views
+1 *NM* - 21/01/2014 07:50:30 PM 736 Views
+1 *NM* - 19/03/2014 04:17:18 AM 713 Views
The final post in the brief discussion there says it all. - 17/01/2014 09:59:17 PM 1677 Views
Why does anybody care? - 18/01/2014 05:05:32 AM 1692 Views
Or to put it another way, I agree with beetnemesis. *NM* - 18/01/2014 05:06:14 AM 918 Views
Dumb - 18/01/2014 01:53:42 PM 1227 Views
I can see the argument, but in general, no. - 18/01/2014 08:37:43 PM 1386 Views
If anything, I think BS was more aware of Egwene's flaws - 20/01/2014 04:00:24 AM 1355 Views
That's Cannoli's point. - 21/01/2014 07:55:07 PM 1256 Views
This just makes me sad all over again. - 19/01/2014 01:55:08 AM 1374 Views
I would remove the last few RJ books from Canon, before BS' trilogy..... - 20/01/2014 04:13:03 AM 1432 Views
+1 *NM* - 21/01/2014 07:50:14 PM 684 Views
Heartily agreed. *NM* - 29/01/2014 09:50:41 PM 712 Views
No, whatever most of the people here say - they're good! *NM* - 28/01/2014 05:44:49 AM 763 Views

Reply to Message