Active Users:1240 Time:02/11/2025 01:22:32 PM
The very notion that any of the series was important enough to discuss this is absurd. Tom Send a noteboard - 29/01/2014 09:50:06 PM

Sanderson's works have every right to stand alongside the other books. It's clear that the first book he wrote was easily better than four or five of the Jordan books, and the other two were still better than at least three of them.

Political correctness is the pettiest form of casuistry.

ἡ δὲ κἀκ τριῶν τρυπημάτων ἐργαζομένη ἐνεκάλει τῇ φύσει, δυσφορουμένη, ὅτι δὴ μὴ καὶ τοὺς τιτθοὺς αὐτῇ εὐρύτερον ἢ νῦν εἰσι τρυπώη, ὅπως καὶ ἄλλην ἐνταῦθα μίξιν ἐπιτεχνᾶσθαι δυνατὴ εἴη. – Procopius

Ummaka qinnassa nīk!

*MySmiley*
Reply to message
Should the last three books be officially removed from Canon? - 17/01/2014 08:31:08 AM 1872 Views
The first six books were fantastic - 17/01/2014 07:22:28 PM 1258 Views
...this is dumb *NM* - 17/01/2014 08:55:32 PM 639 Views
+1 *NM* - 18/01/2014 03:56:32 PM 641 Views
+1 *NM* - 21/01/2014 07:50:30 PM 617 Views
+1 *NM* - 19/03/2014 04:17:18 AM 617 Views
The final post in the brief discussion there says it all. - 17/01/2014 09:59:17 PM 1444 Views
Why does anybody care? - 18/01/2014 05:05:32 AM 1465 Views
Or to put it another way, I agree with beetnemesis. *NM* - 18/01/2014 05:06:14 AM 791 Views
Dumb - 18/01/2014 01:53:42 PM 1062 Views
I can see the argument, but in general, no. - 18/01/2014 08:37:43 PM 1212 Views
If anything, I think BS was more aware of Egwene's flaws - 20/01/2014 04:00:24 AM 1196 Views
That's Cannoli's point. - 21/01/2014 07:55:07 PM 1056 Views
This just makes me sad all over again. - 19/01/2014 01:55:08 AM 1148 Views
I would remove the last few RJ books from Canon, before BS' trilogy..... - 20/01/2014 04:13:03 AM 1254 Views
+1 *NM* - 21/01/2014 07:50:14 PM 603 Views
Heartily agreed. *NM* - 29/01/2014 09:50:41 PM 632 Views
No, whatever most of the people here say - they're good! *NM* - 28/01/2014 05:44:49 AM 671 Views
The very notion that any of the series was important enough to discuss this is absurd. - 29/01/2014 09:50:06 PM 1157 Views

Reply to Message