Active Users:1728 Time:22/09/2026 04:52:53 AM
The very notion that any of the series was important enough to discuss this is absurd. Tom Send a noteboard - 29/01/2014 09:50:06 PM

Sanderson's works have every right to stand alongside the other books. It's clear that the first book he wrote was easily better than four or five of the Jordan books, and the other two were still better than at least three of them.

Political correctness is the pettiest form of casuistry.

ἡ δὲ κἀκ τριῶν τρυπημάτων ἐργαζομένη ἐνεκάλει τῇ φύσει, δυσφορουμένη, ὅτι δὴ μὴ καὶ τοὺς τιτθοὺς αὐτῇ εὐρύτερον ἢ νῦν εἰσι τρυπώη, ὅπως καὶ ἄλλην ἐνταῦθα μίξιν ἐπιτεχνᾶσθαι δυνατὴ εἴη. – Procopius

Ummaka qinnassa nīk!

*MySmiley*
Reply to message
Should the last three books be officially removed from Canon? - 17/01/2014 08:31:08 AM 2072 Views
The first six books were fantastic - 17/01/2014 07:22:28 PM 1469 Views
...this is dumb *NM* - 17/01/2014 08:55:32 PM 797 Views
+1 *NM* - 18/01/2014 03:56:32 PM 749 Views
+1 *NM* - 21/01/2014 07:50:30 PM 751 Views
+1 *NM* - 19/03/2014 04:17:18 AM 730 Views
The final post in the brief discussion there says it all. - 17/01/2014 09:59:17 PM 1712 Views
Why does anybody care? - 18/01/2014 05:05:32 AM 1723 Views
Or to put it another way, I agree with beetnemesis. *NM* - 18/01/2014 05:06:14 AM 940 Views
Dumb - 18/01/2014 01:53:42 PM 1265 Views
I can see the argument, but in general, no. - 18/01/2014 08:37:43 PM 1417 Views
If anything, I think BS was more aware of Egwene's flaws - 20/01/2014 04:00:24 AM 1391 Views
That's Cannoli's point. - 21/01/2014 07:55:07 PM 1285 Views
This just makes me sad all over again. - 19/01/2014 01:55:08 AM 1407 Views
I would remove the last few RJ books from Canon, before BS' trilogy..... - 20/01/2014 04:13:03 AM 1463 Views
+1 *NM* - 21/01/2014 07:50:14 PM 700 Views
Heartily agreed. *NM* - 29/01/2014 09:50:41 PM 728 Views
No, whatever most of the people here say - they're good! *NM* - 28/01/2014 05:44:49 AM 782 Views
The very notion that any of the series was important enough to discuss this is absurd. - 29/01/2014 09:50:06 PM 1369 Views

Reply to Message