Active Users:1154 Time:07/05/2026 07:42:40 PM
The very notion that any of the series was important enough to discuss this is absurd. Tom Send a noteboard - 29/01/2014 09:50:06 PM

Sanderson's works have every right to stand alongside the other books. It's clear that the first book he wrote was easily better than four or five of the Jordan books, and the other two were still better than at least three of them.

Political correctness is the pettiest form of casuistry.

ἡ δὲ κἀκ τριῶν τρυπημάτων ἐργαζομένη ἐνεκάλει τῇ φύσει, δυσφορουμένη, ὅτι δὴ μὴ καὶ τοὺς τιτθοὺς αὐτῇ εὐρύτερον ἢ νῦν εἰσι τρυπώη, ὅπως καὶ ἄλλην ἐνταῦθα μίξιν ἐπιτεχνᾶσθαι δυνατὴ εἴη. – Procopius

Ummaka qinnassa nīk!

*MySmiley*
Reply to message
Should the last three books be officially removed from Canon? - 17/01/2014 08:31:08 AM 2004 Views
The first six books were fantastic - 17/01/2014 07:22:28 PM 1393 Views
...this is dumb *NM* - 17/01/2014 08:55:32 PM 759 Views
+1 *NM* - 18/01/2014 03:56:32 PM 709 Views
+1 *NM* - 21/01/2014 07:50:30 PM 716 Views
+1 *NM* - 19/03/2014 04:17:18 AM 686 Views
The final post in the brief discussion there says it all. - 17/01/2014 09:59:17 PM 1631 Views
Why does anybody care? - 18/01/2014 05:05:32 AM 1650 Views
Or to put it another way, I agree with beetnemesis. *NM* - 18/01/2014 05:06:14 AM 897 Views
Dumb - 18/01/2014 01:53:42 PM 1192 Views
I can see the argument, but in general, no. - 18/01/2014 08:37:43 PM 1354 Views
If anything, I think BS was more aware of Egwene's flaws - 20/01/2014 04:00:24 AM 1323 Views
That's Cannoli's point. - 21/01/2014 07:55:07 PM 1209 Views
This just makes me sad all over again. - 19/01/2014 01:55:08 AM 1339 Views
I would remove the last few RJ books from Canon, before BS' trilogy..... - 20/01/2014 04:13:03 AM 1394 Views
+1 *NM* - 21/01/2014 07:50:14 PM 662 Views
Heartily agreed. *NM* - 29/01/2014 09:50:41 PM 690 Views
No, whatever most of the people here say - they're good! *NM* - 28/01/2014 05:44:49 AM 743 Views
The very notion that any of the series was important enough to discuss this is absurd. - 29/01/2014 09:50:06 PM 1302 Views

Reply to Message