Active Users:620 Time:06/05/2026 01:21:26 AM
Re: This honestly never bothered me that much kHz1000 Send a noteboard - 21/10/2016 04:05:20 PM

View original postBecause of this, putting in a gay man as a minor character seemed less like it was caving to PC pressure to "PUT A GAY MAN IN THE SERIES BECAUSE THEY SHOULD BE REPRESENTED" and more like a (rather late) attempt at more consistent world-building.

But it was, BS consciously decided he should place a gay guy in WoT to rectify RJ's perceived mishap. He expressely stated it was so. To me it came off as an unnecessary appendage in an otherwise organic story. Thank you, Mr Sanderson, but your alms are not necessary. And if some straight person found the lack of gay men problematic (God how I loath the word), well really, who cares what straight people think?
Reply to message
Gender in WoT - 19/10/2016 05:25:44 PM 1682 Views
Egwene the Sun God, Rand the Mother (and the nature of OP) - 20/10/2016 01:30:05 PM 1030 Views
Re: Egwene the Sun God, Rand the Mother (and the nature of OP) - 20/10/2016 04:46:54 PM 1038 Views
Re: Egwene the Sun God, Rand the Mother (and the nature of OP) - 21/10/2016 11:28:14 AM 1132 Views
Re: Egwene the Sun God, Rand the Mother (and the nature of OP) - 21/10/2016 12:44:08 PM 915 Views
Re: Egwene the Sun God, Rand the Mother (and the nature of OP) - 23/10/2016 12:32:14 AM 1065 Views
Re: Egwene the Sun God, Rand the Mother (and the nature of OP) - 23/10/2016 08:43:57 PM 938 Views
Sanderson's fan service gay characters were a mistake - 20/10/2016 02:56:34 PM 1243 Views
This honestly never bothered me that much - 21/10/2016 03:50:37 PM 1051 Views
Re: This honestly never bothered me that much - 21/10/2016 04:05:20 PM 1027 Views
Re: This honestly never bothered me that much - 21/10/2016 06:24:43 PM 1081 Views
Re: This honestly never bothered me that much - 21/10/2016 07:28:34 PM 975 Views
Since you don't seem to know what your opinion actually is - 21/10/2016 08:08:26 PM 931 Views
Re: Since you don't seem to know what your opinion actually is - 21/10/2016 08:30:31 PM 963 Views
That's an unfair assessment - 24/10/2016 04:13:45 AM 1319 Views
Re: That's an unfair assessment - 25/10/2016 12:41:51 AM 1188 Views
Should have been more clear - 25/10/2016 02:34:41 AM 1142 Views
Oh, yes, that's a good point then. - 01/11/2016 10:18:07 AM 965 Views
I agree - 01/11/2016 03:49:45 PM 1193 Views
On f**king - 20/10/2016 04:28:31 PM 1147 Views
Double post *NM* - 20/10/2016 04:33:11 PM 455 Views

Reply to Message