Active Users:454 Time:04/07/2026 11:54:28 PM
Re: This honestly never bothered me that much kHz1000 Send a noteboard - 21/10/2016 04:05:20 PM

View original postBecause of this, putting in a gay man as a minor character seemed less like it was caving to PC pressure to "PUT A GAY MAN IN THE SERIES BECAUSE THEY SHOULD BE REPRESENTED" and more like a (rather late) attempt at more consistent world-building.

But it was, BS consciously decided he should place a gay guy in WoT to rectify RJ's perceived mishap. He expressely stated it was so. To me it came off as an unnecessary appendage in an otherwise organic story. Thank you, Mr Sanderson, but your alms are not necessary. And if some straight person found the lack of gay men problematic (God how I loath the word), well really, who cares what straight people think?
Reply to message
Gender in WoT - 19/10/2016 05:25:44 PM 1711 Views
Egwene the Sun God, Rand the Mother (and the nature of OP) - 20/10/2016 01:30:05 PM 1068 Views
Re: Egwene the Sun God, Rand the Mother (and the nature of OP) - 20/10/2016 04:46:54 PM 1071 Views
Re: Egwene the Sun God, Rand the Mother (and the nature of OP) - 21/10/2016 11:28:14 AM 1157 Views
Re: Egwene the Sun God, Rand the Mother (and the nature of OP) - 21/10/2016 12:44:08 PM 950 Views
Re: Egwene the Sun God, Rand the Mother (and the nature of OP) - 23/10/2016 12:32:14 AM 1091 Views
Re: Egwene the Sun God, Rand the Mother (and the nature of OP) - 23/10/2016 08:43:57 PM 976 Views
Sanderson's fan service gay characters were a mistake - 20/10/2016 02:56:34 PM 1426 Views
This honestly never bothered me that much - 21/10/2016 03:50:37 PM 1076 Views
Re: This honestly never bothered me that much - 21/10/2016 04:05:20 PM 1056 Views
Re: This honestly never bothered me that much - 21/10/2016 06:24:43 PM 1116 Views
Re: This honestly never bothered me that much - 21/10/2016 07:28:34 PM 1005 Views
Since you don't seem to know what your opinion actually is - 21/10/2016 08:08:26 PM 959 Views
Re: Since you don't seem to know what your opinion actually is - 21/10/2016 08:30:31 PM 994 Views
That's an unfair assessment - 24/10/2016 04:13:45 AM 1343 Views
Re: That's an unfair assessment - 25/10/2016 12:41:51 AM 1213 Views
Should have been more clear - 25/10/2016 02:34:41 AM 1166 Views
Oh, yes, that's a good point then. - 01/11/2016 10:18:07 AM 992 Views
I agree - 01/11/2016 03:49:45 PM 1249 Views
On f**king - 20/10/2016 04:28:31 PM 1184 Views
Double post *NM* - 20/10/2016 04:33:11 PM 475 Views

Reply to Message