Active Users:727 Time:08/09/2026 04:30:19 PM
Re: This honestly never bothered me that much kHz1000 Send a noteboard - 21/10/2016 04:05:20 PM

View original postBecause of this, putting in a gay man as a minor character seemed less like it was caving to PC pressure to "PUT A GAY MAN IN THE SERIES BECAUSE THEY SHOULD BE REPRESENTED" and more like a (rather late) attempt at more consistent world-building.

But it was, BS consciously decided he should place a gay guy in WoT to rectify RJ's perceived mishap. He expressely stated it was so. To me it came off as an unnecessary appendage in an otherwise organic story. Thank you, Mr Sanderson, but your alms are not necessary. And if some straight person found the lack of gay men problematic (God how I loath the word), well really, who cares what straight people think?
Reply to message
Gender in WoT - 19/10/2016 05:25:44 PM 1749 Views
Egwene the Sun God, Rand the Mother (and the nature of OP) - 20/10/2016 01:30:05 PM 1113 Views
Re: Egwene the Sun God, Rand the Mother (and the nature of OP) - 20/10/2016 04:46:54 PM 1134 Views
Re: Egwene the Sun God, Rand the Mother (and the nature of OP) - 21/10/2016 11:28:14 AM 1198 Views
Re: Egwene the Sun God, Rand the Mother (and the nature of OP) - 21/10/2016 12:44:08 PM 983 Views
Re: Egwene the Sun God, Rand the Mother (and the nature of OP) - 23/10/2016 12:32:14 AM 1127 Views
Re: Egwene the Sun God, Rand the Mother (and the nature of OP) - 23/10/2016 08:43:57 PM 1006 Views
Sanderson's fan service gay characters were a mistake - 20/10/2016 02:56:34 PM 1519 Views
It was wrong because sodomy is an abomination against the Light - 21/10/2016 11:04:08 AM 1131 Views
This honestly never bothered me that much - 21/10/2016 03:50:37 PM 1108 Views
Re: This honestly never bothered me that much - 21/10/2016 04:05:20 PM 1092 Views
Re: This honestly never bothered me that much - 21/10/2016 06:24:43 PM 1160 Views
Re: This honestly never bothered me that much - 21/10/2016 07:28:34 PM 1038 Views
Since you don't seem to know what your opinion actually is - 21/10/2016 08:08:26 PM 992 Views
Re: Since you don't seem to know what your opinion actually is - 21/10/2016 08:30:31 PM 1025 Views
That's an unfair assessment - 24/10/2016 04:13:45 AM 1371 Views
Re: That's an unfair assessment - 25/10/2016 12:41:51 AM 1248 Views
Should have been more clear - 25/10/2016 02:34:41 AM 1203 Views
Oh, yes, that's a good point then. - 01/11/2016 10:18:07 AM 1025 Views
I agree - 01/11/2016 03:49:45 PM 1286 Views
On f**king - 20/10/2016 04:28:31 PM 1224 Views
Double post *NM* - 20/10/2016 04:33:11 PM 491 Views

Reply to Message