Active Users:658 Time:21/03/2026 07:08:34 PM
Re: This honestly never bothered me that much ßelals Girl Send a noteboard - 21/10/2016 06:24:43 PM

View original post

But it was, BS consciously decided he should place a gay guy in WoT to rectify RJ's perceived mishap. He expressely stated it was so. To me it came off as an unnecessary appendage in an otherwise organic story. Thank you, Mr Sanderson, but your alms are not necessary. And if some straight person found the lack of gay men problematic (God how I loath the word), well really, who cares what straight people think?


Not "problematic," I said the lack of gay men in the story was inconsistent with the in-universe view of open homosexuality. Maybe that doesn't matter to you, but...who cares what you think?

Reply to message
Gender in WoT - 19/10/2016 05:25:44 PM 1630 Views
Egwene the Sun God, Rand the Mother (and the nature of OP) - 20/10/2016 01:30:05 PM 995 Views
Re: Egwene the Sun God, Rand the Mother (and the nature of OP) - 20/10/2016 04:46:54 PM 1001 Views
Re: Egwene the Sun God, Rand the Mother (and the nature of OP) - 21/10/2016 11:28:14 AM 1098 Views
Re: Egwene the Sun God, Rand the Mother (and the nature of OP) - 21/10/2016 12:44:08 PM 889 Views
Re: Egwene the Sun God, Rand the Mother (and the nature of OP) - 23/10/2016 12:32:14 AM 1035 Views
Re: Egwene the Sun God, Rand the Mother (and the nature of OP) - 23/10/2016 08:43:57 PM 902 Views
Sanderson's fan service gay characters were a mistake - 20/10/2016 02:56:34 PM 1179 Views
This honestly never bothered me that much - 21/10/2016 03:50:37 PM 1016 Views
Re: This honestly never bothered me that much - 21/10/2016 04:05:20 PM 989 Views
Re: This honestly never bothered me that much - 21/10/2016 06:24:43 PM 1057 Views
Re: This honestly never bothered me that much - 21/10/2016 07:28:34 PM 940 Views
Since you don't seem to know what your opinion actually is - 21/10/2016 08:08:26 PM 896 Views
Re: Since you don't seem to know what your opinion actually is - 21/10/2016 08:30:31 PM 935 Views
That's an unfair assessment - 24/10/2016 04:13:45 AM 1279 Views
Re: That's an unfair assessment - 25/10/2016 12:41:51 AM 1150 Views
Should have been more clear - 25/10/2016 02:34:41 AM 1098 Views
Oh, yes, that's a good point then. - 01/11/2016 10:18:07 AM 940 Views
I agree - 01/11/2016 03:49:45 PM 1157 Views
On f**king - 20/10/2016 04:28:31 PM 1111 Views
Double post *NM* - 20/10/2016 04:33:11 PM 440 Views

Reply to Message