Active Users:304 Time:10/05/2024 11:17:23 AM
Re: This honestly never bothered me that much ßelals Girl Send a noteboard - 21/10/2016 06:24:43 PM

View original post

But it was, BS consciously decided he should place a gay guy in WoT to rectify RJ's perceived mishap. He expressely stated it was so. To me it came off as an unnecessary appendage in an otherwise organic story. Thank you, Mr Sanderson, but your alms are not necessary. And if some straight person found the lack of gay men problematic (God how I loath the word), well really, who cares what straight people think?


Not "problematic," I said the lack of gay men in the story was inconsistent with the in-universe view of open homosexuality. Maybe that doesn't matter to you, but...who cares what you think?

Reply to message
Gender in WoT - 19/10/2016 05:25:44 PM 1313 Views
Egwene the Sun God, Rand the Mother (and the nature of OP) - 20/10/2016 01:30:05 PM 641 Views
Re: Egwene the Sun God, Rand the Mother (and the nature of OP) - 20/10/2016 04:46:54 PM 616 Views
Re: Egwene the Sun God, Rand the Mother (and the nature of OP) - 21/10/2016 11:28:14 AM 735 Views
Re: Egwene the Sun God, Rand the Mother (and the nature of OP) - 21/10/2016 12:44:08 PM 595 Views
Re: Egwene the Sun God, Rand the Mother (and the nature of OP) - 23/10/2016 12:32:14 AM 671 Views
Re: Egwene the Sun God, Rand the Mother (and the nature of OP) - 23/10/2016 08:43:57 PM 579 Views
Sanderson's fan service gay characters were a mistake - 20/10/2016 02:56:34 PM 730 Views
This honestly never bothered me that much - 21/10/2016 03:50:37 PM 696 Views
Re: This honestly never bothered me that much - 21/10/2016 04:05:20 PM 650 Views
Re: This honestly never bothered me that much - 21/10/2016 06:24:43 PM 739 Views
Re: This honestly never bothered me that much - 21/10/2016 07:28:34 PM 610 Views
Since you don't seem to know what your opinion actually is - 21/10/2016 08:08:26 PM 588 Views
Re: Since you don't seem to know what your opinion actually is - 21/10/2016 08:30:31 PM 592 Views
That's an unfair assessment - 24/10/2016 04:13:45 AM 854 Views
Re: That's an unfair assessment - 25/10/2016 12:41:51 AM 810 Views
Should have been more clear - 25/10/2016 02:34:41 AM 679 Views
Oh, yes, that's a good point then. - 01/11/2016 10:18:07 AM 632 Views
I agree - 01/11/2016 03:49:45 PM 729 Views
On f**king - 20/10/2016 04:28:31 PM 817 Views
Double post *NM* - 20/10/2016 04:33:11 PM 309 Views

Reply to Message