Active Users:472 Time:18/09/2025 03:36:46 PM
Re: This honestly never bothered me that much ßelals Girl Send a noteboard - 21/10/2016 06:24:43 PM

View original post

But it was, BS consciously decided he should place a gay guy in WoT to rectify RJ's perceived mishap. He expressely stated it was so. To me it came off as an unnecessary appendage in an otherwise organic story. Thank you, Mr Sanderson, but your alms are not necessary. And if some straight person found the lack of gay men problematic (God how I loath the word), well really, who cares what straight people think?


Not "problematic," I said the lack of gay men in the story was inconsistent with the in-universe view of open homosexuality. Maybe that doesn't matter to you, but...who cares what you think?

Reply to message
Gender in WoT - 19/10/2016 05:25:44 PM 1513 Views
Egwene the Sun God, Rand the Mother (and the nature of OP) - 20/10/2016 01:30:05 PM 877 Views
Re: Egwene the Sun God, Rand the Mother (and the nature of OP) - 20/10/2016 04:46:54 PM 871 Views
Re: Egwene the Sun God, Rand the Mother (and the nature of OP) - 21/10/2016 11:28:14 AM 979 Views
Re: Egwene the Sun God, Rand the Mother (and the nature of OP) - 21/10/2016 12:44:08 PM 806 Views
Re: Egwene the Sun God, Rand the Mother (and the nature of OP) - 23/10/2016 12:32:14 AM 904 Views
Re: Egwene the Sun God, Rand the Mother (and the nature of OP) - 23/10/2016 08:43:57 PM 784 Views
Sanderson's fan service gay characters were a mistake - 20/10/2016 02:56:34 PM 1043 Views
This honestly never bothered me that much - 21/10/2016 03:50:37 PM 911 Views
Re: This honestly never bothered me that much - 21/10/2016 04:05:20 PM 869 Views
Re: This honestly never bothered me that much - 21/10/2016 06:24:43 PM 940 Views
Re: This honestly never bothered me that much - 21/10/2016 07:28:34 PM 827 Views
Since you don't seem to know what your opinion actually is - 21/10/2016 08:08:26 PM 803 Views
Re: Since you don't seem to know what your opinion actually is - 21/10/2016 08:30:31 PM 836 Views
That's an unfair assessment - 24/10/2016 04:13:45 AM 1147 Views
Re: That's an unfair assessment - 25/10/2016 12:41:51 AM 1054 Views
Should have been more clear - 25/10/2016 02:34:41 AM 962 Views
Oh, yes, that's a good point then. - 01/11/2016 10:18:07 AM 835 Views
I agree - 01/11/2016 03:49:45 PM 1033 Views
On f**king - 20/10/2016 04:28:31 PM 1024 Views
Double post *NM* - 20/10/2016 04:33:11 PM 401 Views

Reply to Message