Active Users:273 Time:11/05/2024 10:03:06 PM
IMHO dexterity only ever seemed to BE an equalizer power-wise in head to head combat. Dunstan Send a noteboard - 23/10/2016 04:35:28 PM

View original post
The men don't really need to be obviously stronger than the women for the story to be told. In fact, aside from a handful of outliers I don't think RJ gave it much thought because he also considered dexterity as an equalizer. Not really a concept that would play all that well in a TV Show IMO. Might be really interesting to see something like that executed well. We'd really ONLY see effective Strength and many people may have a different view of the OP and "strength". Even make us see it in the way the AoL AS saw it.

As seemed to be why men were still considered to make better weapons. I mean, it might make the women "better" at some fine weaves, but when the goal is simply to keep throwing out the massive sheets of fire, or to just make gateway after gateway after gateway... What the channeler needs is the raw strength to be able to DO it in the first place.

Well... That and just gateways in and of themselves, and other "must be this strong to even use" weaves as well. Maybe it's just a small sample size, but it always seemed like a hell of a lot more Ashaman then Aes Sedai were powerful enough to Travel(like just ab out every Ashaman we ever saw)... Even outside of combat, Traveling is a pretty big freaking deal.

Reply to message
Gender in WoT - 19/10/2016 05:25:44 PM 1313 Views
Egwene the Sun God, Rand the Mother (and the nature of OP) - 20/10/2016 01:30:05 PM 641 Views
Re: Egwene the Sun God, Rand the Mother (and the nature of OP) - 20/10/2016 04:46:54 PM 618 Views
Re: Egwene the Sun God, Rand the Mother (and the nature of OP) - 21/10/2016 11:28:14 AM 735 Views
Re: Egwene the Sun God, Rand the Mother (and the nature of OP) - 21/10/2016 12:44:08 PM 595 Views
Re: Egwene the Sun God, Rand the Mother (and the nature of OP) - 23/10/2016 12:32:14 AM 672 Views
Re: Egwene the Sun God, Rand the Mother (and the nature of OP) - 23/10/2016 08:43:57 PM 579 Views
Sanderson's fan service gay characters were a mistake - 20/10/2016 02:56:34 PM 730 Views
This honestly never bothered me that much - 21/10/2016 03:50:37 PM 697 Views
Re: This honestly never bothered me that much - 21/10/2016 04:05:20 PM 650 Views
Re: This honestly never bothered me that much - 21/10/2016 06:24:43 PM 739 Views
Re: This honestly never bothered me that much - 21/10/2016 07:28:34 PM 610 Views
Since you don't seem to know what your opinion actually is - 21/10/2016 08:08:26 PM 589 Views
Re: Since you don't seem to know what your opinion actually is - 21/10/2016 08:30:31 PM 592 Views
That's an unfair assessment - 24/10/2016 04:13:45 AM 855 Views
Re: That's an unfair assessment - 25/10/2016 12:41:51 AM 812 Views
Should have been more clear - 25/10/2016 02:34:41 AM 679 Views
Oh, yes, that's a good point then. - 01/11/2016 10:18:07 AM 633 Views
I agree - 01/11/2016 03:49:45 PM 730 Views
On f**king - 20/10/2016 04:28:31 PM 817 Views
Double post *NM* - 20/10/2016 04:33:11 PM 309 Views
Makes me wonder how they will handle if the produce a TV show - 23/10/2016 03:03:18 PM 770 Views
IMHO dexterity only ever seemed to BE an equalizer power-wise in head to head combat. - 23/10/2016 04:35:28 PM 759 Views

Reply to Message