Active Users:550 Time:31/10/2026 11:11:12 PM
Agreed Simon Send a noteboard - 31/10/2009 02:52:33 PM
The idea should be abolished, and dropped into the ocean like the male a'dam was supposed to be, but the Sul'dam themselves? No.


And she refused. Therefore if the sul'dam come for channelers they should be destroyed, just like Egwene destroyed them. The sul'dam are also notoriously sadistic, probably as part of their training. The world doesn't need people like that.

Reply to message
Is anyone angered by the Seanchan and a'dam? - 30/10/2009 11:14:00 PM 1838 Views
Yes, but not me - 30/10/2009 11:32:45 PM 1090 Views
Re: Yes, but not me - 31/10/2009 12:49:42 AM 1055 Views
I hated him - 31/10/2009 12:57:52 AM 1049 Views
Re: Is anyone angry by the Seanchan and A'dam - 30/10/2009 11:39:45 PM 1225 Views
Re: Is anyone angry by the Seanchan and A'dam - 30/10/2009 11:45:29 PM 1063 Views
Except the Seanchan are not spoiled chidlren who mistake "wishful thinking" for a plan - 31/10/2009 04:48:45 AM 1121 Views
Or he could have used the Choedan Kal - 31/10/2009 12:21:42 PM 1061 Views
What Choedan Kal? *NM* - 31/10/2009 10:15:24 PM 444 Views
The big shiney ball thing he destroyed at the end of the book - 01/11/2009 07:50:15 PM 1011 Views
Destroyed. My point exactly. *NM* - 06/11/2009 04:40:16 AM 418 Views
For what? - 31/10/2009 12:03:57 AM 1057 Views
I dont think it's compulsion. - 31/10/2009 12:16:00 AM 977 Views
Actually, I think it's the other way around. - 31/10/2009 12:21:49 AM 951 Views
He did the same thing with Cady - 31/10/2009 12:25:51 AM 966 Views
Personally, I thought he was using the TP to do those things. - 04/11/2009 07:37:31 PM 916 Views
It wasn't Compulsion...Sanderson just sort of messed up IMO - 04/11/2009 11:38:38 PM 871 Views
No - 31/10/2009 12:06:13 AM 1002 Views
Why not Highlords in Tear? - 31/10/2009 02:10:07 AM 1060 Views
You dont really get it. - 31/10/2009 12:23:35 PM 934 Views
That is just POV trap - 31/10/2009 04:20:07 PM 923 Views
Flawed Argument - 31/10/2009 08:54:05 PM 916 Views
Not at all. Their position is perfectly justified by their experiences. - 31/10/2009 04:29:25 AM 1049 Views
The a'dam and leashing of channelers does not change the fact that the OP can be misued... - 31/10/2009 09:17:20 AM 1027 Views
Which is why people should NOT be MORE angered toward Seanchan than toward WT. - 31/10/2009 06:22:13 PM 947 Views
That's complete hogwash. - 31/10/2009 10:23:50 PM 1000 Views
Think it through - 31/10/2009 10:25:08 PM 1026 Views
I have... - 31/10/2009 11:05:20 PM 1014 Views
Re: I have... - 01/11/2009 02:27:20 AM 1240 Views
Well that was rather silly. - 31/10/2009 12:27:03 PM 886 Views
Several valid points... - 31/10/2009 05:17:09 PM 991 Views
The sul'dam should be destroyed - 31/10/2009 05:14:06 AM 917 Views
The people themselves shouldn't be. - 31/10/2009 05:26:08 AM 954 Views
^ *NM* - 31/10/2009 05:33:04 AM 403 Views
Only the Empress can remove the custom - 31/10/2009 05:48:09 AM 938 Views
Due to their conditioning. - 31/10/2009 06:03:32 AM 944 Views
Random - 31/10/2009 10:26:34 AM 906 Views
Agreed - 31/10/2009 02:52:33 PM 931 Views
Yes. - 04/11/2009 06:15:08 PM 896 Views

Reply to Message