Active Users:636 Time:19/03/2026 08:17:02 AM
Agreed Simon Send a noteboard - 31/10/2009 02:52:33 PM
The idea should be abolished, and dropped into the ocean like the male a'dam was supposed to be, but the Sul'dam themselves? No.


And she refused. Therefore if the sul'dam come for channelers they should be destroyed, just like Egwene destroyed them. The sul'dam are also notoriously sadistic, probably as part of their training. The world doesn't need people like that.

Reply to message
Is anyone angered by the Seanchan and a'dam? - 30/10/2009 11:14:00 PM 1684 Views
Yes, but not me - 30/10/2009 11:32:45 PM 970 Views
Re: Yes, but not me - 31/10/2009 12:49:42 AM 933 Views
I hated him - 31/10/2009 12:57:52 AM 896 Views
Re: Is anyone angry by the Seanchan and A'dam - 30/10/2009 11:39:45 PM 1086 Views
Re: Is anyone angry by the Seanchan and A'dam - 30/10/2009 11:45:29 PM 937 Views
Except the Seanchan are not spoiled chidlren who mistake "wishful thinking" for a plan - 31/10/2009 04:48:45 AM 969 Views
Or he could have used the Choedan Kal - 31/10/2009 12:21:42 PM 920 Views
What Choedan Kal? *NM* - 31/10/2009 10:15:24 PM 372 Views
The big shiney ball thing he destroyed at the end of the book - 01/11/2009 07:50:15 PM 858 Views
Destroyed. My point exactly. *NM* - 06/11/2009 04:40:16 AM 350 Views
For what? - 31/10/2009 12:03:57 AM 918 Views
I dont think it's compulsion. - 31/10/2009 12:16:00 AM 850 Views
Actually, I think it's the other way around. - 31/10/2009 12:21:49 AM 821 Views
He did the same thing with Cady - 31/10/2009 12:25:51 AM 846 Views
Personally, I thought he was using the TP to do those things. - 04/11/2009 07:37:31 PM 793 Views
It wasn't Compulsion...Sanderson just sort of messed up IMO - 04/11/2009 11:38:38 PM 753 Views
No - 31/10/2009 12:06:13 AM 875 Views
Why not Highlords in Tear? - 31/10/2009 02:10:07 AM 940 Views
You dont really get it. - 31/10/2009 12:23:35 PM 812 Views
That is just POV trap - 31/10/2009 04:20:07 PM 797 Views
Flawed Argument - 31/10/2009 08:54:05 PM 792 Views
Not at all. Their position is perfectly justified by their experiences. - 31/10/2009 04:29:25 AM 911 Views
The a'dam and leashing of channelers does not change the fact that the OP can be misued... - 31/10/2009 09:17:20 AM 909 Views
Which is why people should NOT be MORE angered toward Seanchan than toward WT. - 31/10/2009 06:22:13 PM 796 Views
That's complete hogwash. - 31/10/2009 10:23:50 PM 831 Views
Think it through - 31/10/2009 10:25:08 PM 885 Views
I have... - 31/10/2009 11:05:20 PM 881 Views
Re: I have... - 01/11/2009 02:27:20 AM 1105 Views
Well that was rather silly. - 31/10/2009 12:27:03 PM 756 Views
Several valid points... - 31/10/2009 05:17:09 PM 864 Views
The sul'dam should be destroyed - 31/10/2009 05:14:06 AM 795 Views
The people themselves shouldn't be. - 31/10/2009 05:26:08 AM 811 Views
^ *NM* - 31/10/2009 05:33:04 AM 341 Views
Only the Empress can remove the custom - 31/10/2009 05:48:09 AM 796 Views
Due to their conditioning. - 31/10/2009 06:03:32 AM 820 Views
Random - 31/10/2009 10:26:34 AM 778 Views
Agreed - 31/10/2009 02:52:33 PM 788 Views
Yes. - 04/11/2009 06:15:08 PM 740 Views

Reply to Message