Active Users:483 Time:02/05/2025 04:34:23 PM
Agreed Simon Send a noteboard - 31/10/2009 02:52:33 PM
The idea should be abolished, and dropped into the ocean like the male a'dam was supposed to be, but the Sul'dam themselves? No.


And she refused. Therefore if the sul'dam come for channelers they should be destroyed, just like Egwene destroyed them. The sul'dam are also notoriously sadistic, probably as part of their training. The world doesn't need people like that.

Reply to message
Is anyone angered by the Seanchan and a'dam? - 30/10/2009 11:14:00 PM 1540 Views
Yes, but not me - 30/10/2009 11:32:45 PM 797 Views
Re: Yes, but not me - 31/10/2009 12:49:42 AM 753 Views
I hated him - 31/10/2009 12:57:52 AM 734 Views
Re: Is anyone angry by the Seanchan and A'dam - 30/10/2009 11:39:45 PM 923 Views
Re: Is anyone angry by the Seanchan and A'dam - 30/10/2009 11:45:29 PM 754 Views
Except the Seanchan are not spoiled chidlren who mistake "wishful thinking" for a plan - 31/10/2009 04:48:45 AM 789 Views
Or he could have used the Choedan Kal - 31/10/2009 12:21:42 PM 746 Views
What Choedan Kal? *NM* - 31/10/2009 10:15:24 PM 292 Views
The big shiney ball thing he destroyed at the end of the book - 01/11/2009 07:50:15 PM 698 Views
Destroyed. My point exactly. *NM* - 06/11/2009 04:40:16 AM 276 Views
For what? - 31/10/2009 12:03:57 AM 736 Views
I dont think it's compulsion. - 31/10/2009 12:16:00 AM 688 Views
Actually, I think it's the other way around. - 31/10/2009 12:21:49 AM 666 Views
He did the same thing with Cady - 31/10/2009 12:25:51 AM 677 Views
Personally, I thought he was using the TP to do those things. - 04/11/2009 07:37:31 PM 625 Views
It wasn't Compulsion...Sanderson just sort of messed up IMO - 04/11/2009 11:38:38 PM 572 Views
No - 31/10/2009 12:06:13 AM 688 Views
Why not Highlords in Tear? - 31/10/2009 02:10:07 AM 789 Views
You dont really get it. - 31/10/2009 12:23:35 PM 633 Views
That is just POV trap - 31/10/2009 04:20:07 PM 623 Views
Flawed Argument - 31/10/2009 08:54:05 PM 622 Views
Not at all. Their position is perfectly justified by their experiences. - 31/10/2009 04:29:25 AM 725 Views
The a'dam and leashing of channelers does not change the fact that the OP can be misued... - 31/10/2009 09:17:20 AM 718 Views
Which is why people should NOT be MORE angered toward Seanchan than toward WT. - 31/10/2009 06:22:13 PM 616 Views
That's complete hogwash. - 31/10/2009 10:23:50 PM 640 Views
Think it through - 31/10/2009 10:25:08 PM 716 Views
I have... - 31/10/2009 11:05:20 PM 716 Views
Re: I have... - 01/11/2009 02:27:20 AM 888 Views
Well that was rather silly. - 31/10/2009 12:27:03 PM 590 Views
Several valid points... - 31/10/2009 05:17:09 PM 675 Views
The sul'dam should be destroyed - 31/10/2009 05:14:06 AM 641 Views
The people themselves shouldn't be. - 31/10/2009 05:26:08 AM 629 Views
^ *NM* - 31/10/2009 05:33:04 AM 270 Views
Only the Empress can remove the custom - 31/10/2009 05:48:09 AM 623 Views
Due to their conditioning. - 31/10/2009 06:03:32 AM 645 Views
Random - 31/10/2009 10:26:34 AM 618 Views
Agreed - 31/10/2009 02:52:33 PM 613 Views
Yes. - 04/11/2009 06:15:08 PM 562 Views

Reply to Message