Active Users:1700 Time:03/05/2026 04:36:38 PM
Agreed Simon Send a noteboard - 31/10/2009 02:52:33 PM
The idea should be abolished, and dropped into the ocean like the male a'dam was supposed to be, but the Sul'dam themselves? No.


And she refused. Therefore if the sul'dam come for channelers they should be destroyed, just like Egwene destroyed them. The sul'dam are also notoriously sadistic, probably as part of their training. The world doesn't need people like that.

Reply to message
Is anyone angered by the Seanchan and a'dam? - 30/10/2009 11:14:00 PM 1709 Views
Yes, but not me - 30/10/2009 11:32:45 PM 990 Views
Re: Yes, but not me - 31/10/2009 12:49:42 AM 958 Views
I hated him - 31/10/2009 12:57:52 AM 923 Views
Re: Is anyone angry by the Seanchan and A'dam - 30/10/2009 11:39:45 PM 1121 Views
Re: Is anyone angry by the Seanchan and A'dam - 30/10/2009 11:45:29 PM 964 Views
Except the Seanchan are not spoiled chidlren who mistake "wishful thinking" for a plan - 31/10/2009 04:48:45 AM 1002 Views
Or he could have used the Choedan Kal - 31/10/2009 12:21:42 PM 944 Views
What Choedan Kal? *NM* - 31/10/2009 10:15:24 PM 385 Views
The big shiney ball thing he destroyed at the end of the book - 01/11/2009 07:50:15 PM 883 Views
Destroyed. My point exactly. *NM* - 06/11/2009 04:40:16 AM 364 Views
For what? - 31/10/2009 12:03:57 AM 951 Views
I dont think it's compulsion. - 31/10/2009 12:16:00 AM 880 Views
Actually, I think it's the other way around. - 31/10/2009 12:21:49 AM 845 Views
He did the same thing with Cady - 31/10/2009 12:25:51 AM 871 Views
Personally, I thought he was using the TP to do those things. - 04/11/2009 07:37:31 PM 819 Views
It wasn't Compulsion...Sanderson just sort of messed up IMO - 04/11/2009 11:38:38 PM 776 Views
No - 31/10/2009 12:06:13 AM 902 Views
Why not Highlords in Tear? - 31/10/2009 02:10:07 AM 967 Views
You dont really get it. - 31/10/2009 12:23:35 PM 839 Views
That is just POV trap - 31/10/2009 04:20:07 PM 826 Views
Flawed Argument - 31/10/2009 08:54:05 PM 816 Views
Not at all. Their position is perfectly justified by their experiences. - 31/10/2009 04:29:25 AM 947 Views
The a'dam and leashing of channelers does not change the fact that the OP can be misued... - 31/10/2009 09:17:20 AM 931 Views
Which is why people should NOT be MORE angered toward Seanchan than toward WT. - 31/10/2009 06:22:13 PM 823 Views
That's complete hogwash. - 31/10/2009 10:23:50 PM 866 Views
Think it through - 31/10/2009 10:25:08 PM 915 Views
I have... - 31/10/2009 11:05:20 PM 909 Views
Re: I have... - 01/11/2009 02:27:20 AM 1133 Views
Well that was rather silly. - 31/10/2009 12:27:03 PM 791 Views
Several valid points... - 31/10/2009 05:17:09 PM 891 Views
The sul'dam should be destroyed - 31/10/2009 05:14:06 AM 818 Views
The people themselves shouldn't be. - 31/10/2009 05:26:08 AM 844 Views
^ *NM* - 31/10/2009 05:33:04 AM 353 Views
Only the Empress can remove the custom - 31/10/2009 05:48:09 AM 822 Views
Due to their conditioning. - 31/10/2009 06:03:32 AM 845 Views
Random - 31/10/2009 10:26:34 AM 809 Views
Agreed - 31/10/2009 02:52:33 PM 812 Views
Yes. - 04/11/2009 06:15:08 PM 771 Views

Reply to Message