but for me personally, and I think for a lot of people, those points are not sufficient to justify the practice. I do agree that it would be unreasonable to expect the Seanchan to immediately give up the practice, considering your points but on the other hand it would be equally unreasonable to expect the Aes Sedai (or Aiel, or Seafolk) to be okay with them doing it. And it certainly is something that makes it harder to cheer for them - it's entirely intentional, of course, that RJ and now Sanderson keep harping on how solid rulers the Seanchans are, how they are rather good rulers for the average citizen, at the cost of the horrible treatment of one small group of citizens. A good way of keeping them grey and keeping them from being BFFs with the main cast, I'd say - the moment Tuon gives up that stance, if she ever does, she and her whole people become much less interesting from a plot tension point of view.
Is anyone angered by the Seanchan and a'dam?
- 30/10/2009 11:14:00 PM
1738 Views
Yes, but not me
- 30/10/2009 11:32:45 PM
1007 Views
Re: Is anyone angry by the Seanchan and A'dam
- 30/10/2009 11:39:45 PM
1141 Views
Re: Is anyone angry by the Seanchan and A'dam
- 30/10/2009 11:45:29 PM
987 Views
Except the Seanchan are not spoiled chidlren who mistake "wishful thinking" for a plan
- 31/10/2009 04:48:45 AM
1038 Views
Or he could have used the Choedan Kal
- 31/10/2009 12:21:42 PM
981 Views
What Choedan Kal? *NM*
- 31/10/2009 10:15:24 PM
396 Views
For what?
- 31/10/2009 12:03:57 AM
978 Views
if he was it wasn't on purpose. I think he was just actively trying to use his ta'verenness *NM*
- 31/10/2009 12:15:32 AM
400 Views
I dont think it's compulsion.
- 31/10/2009 12:16:00 AM
900 Views
Actually, I think it's the other way around.
- 31/10/2009 12:21:49 AM
869 Views
- 31/10/2009 12:21:49 AM
869 Views
I don't care for Tuon at all. I'd be okay if her and the Seanchan were obliterated. *NM*
- 31/10/2009 12:44:22 AM
403 Views
And how is that any different from me with Egwene (except she & I are the same race)? *NM*
- 31/10/2009 04:51:17 AM
409 Views
Why not Highlords in Tear?
- 31/10/2009 02:10:07 AM
988 Views
You dont really get it.
- 31/10/2009 12:23:35 PM
854 Views
Not at all. Their position is perfectly justified by their experiences.
- 31/10/2009 04:29:25 AM
970 Views
The a'dam and leashing of channelers does not change the fact that the OP can be misued...
- 31/10/2009 09:17:20 AM
949 Views
Which is why people should NOT be MORE angered toward Seanchan than toward WT.
- 31/10/2009 06:22:13 PM
849 Views
That's complete hogwash.
- 31/10/2009 10:23:50 PM
893 Views
Using the word "Hogwash" is inviting flames, but I will be nice about it
- 01/11/2009 05:44:16 AM
916 Views
Re: Using the word "Hogwash" is inviting flames, but I will be nice about it
- 05/11/2009 02:54:52 AM
1193 Views
Well that was rather silly.
- 31/10/2009 12:27:03 PM
815 Views
And a generation later, the same old problem arises. New channelers, with no one to stop them.
- 31/10/2009 10:28:35 PM
814 Views
Several valid points...
- 31/10/2009 05:17:09 PM
911 Views
I wonder what if Egwene happen to be a child kidnapped at Flame and sent to WT
- 31/10/2009 06:30:34 PM
897 Views
The sul'dam should be destroyed
- 31/10/2009 05:14:06 AM
840 Views
The people themselves shouldn't be.
- 31/10/2009 05:26:08 AM
871 Views
Only the Empress can remove the custom
- 31/10/2009 05:48:09 AM
842 Views
Due to their conditioning.
- 31/10/2009 06:03:32 AM
863 Views
She will
(and ya, sul'dam become sul'dam from age 13-18 usually) *NM*
- 31/10/2009 06:12:48 AM
407 Views
(and ya, sul'dam become sul'dam from age 13-18 usually) *NM*
- 31/10/2009 06:12:48 AM
407 Views
I think the a'dam is the perfect solution for Blacks and the Shaido 'Wise Ones'.
- 01/11/2009 02:51:27 AM
930 Views
