I don't believe in slavery, and especially not when it is used to change a conscious being with free will into an automaton. The Seanchan sacrifice a lot of what I consider to be human attributes in exchange for order.
Even worse, Tuon and other sul'dam are channelers, as well. According to their standards, even if they choose not to learn, they are still "unclean". She is very much a hypocrit.
Understanding their history doesn't excuse their inhumanity, and I'm not too impressed with peace achieved by tyranny - that is esentially what the Seanchan impose.
Even worse, Tuon and other sul'dam are channelers, as well. According to their standards, even if they choose not to learn, they are still "unclean". She is very much a hypocrit.
Understanding their history doesn't excuse their inhumanity, and I'm not too impressed with peace achieved by tyranny - that is esentially what the Seanchan impose.
"Those who think they have no time for bodily exercise will sooner or later have to find time for illness."
Is anyone angered by the Seanchan and a'dam?
- 30/10/2009 11:14:00 PM
1657 Views
Yes, but not me
- 30/10/2009 11:32:45 PM
937 Views
Re: Is anyone angry by the Seanchan and A'dam
- 30/10/2009 11:39:45 PM
1047 Views
Re: Is anyone angry by the Seanchan and A'dam
- 30/10/2009 11:45:29 PM
899 Views
Except the Seanchan are not spoiled chidlren who mistake "wishful thinking" for a plan
- 31/10/2009 04:48:45 AM
938 Views
Or he could have used the Choedan Kal
- 31/10/2009 12:21:42 PM
890 Views
What Choedan Kal? *NM*
- 31/10/2009 10:15:24 PM
358 Views
For what?
- 31/10/2009 12:03:57 AM
885 Views
if he was it wasn't on purpose. I think he was just actively trying to use his ta'verenness *NM*
- 31/10/2009 12:15:32 AM
364 Views
I dont think it's compulsion.
- 31/10/2009 12:16:00 AM
821 Views
Actually, I think it's the other way around. 
- 31/10/2009 12:21:49 AM
792 Views
- 31/10/2009 12:21:49 AM
792 Views
I don't care for Tuon at all. I'd be okay if her and the Seanchan were obliterated. *NM*
- 31/10/2009 12:44:22 AM
360 Views
And how is that any different from me with Egwene (except she & I are the same race)? *NM*
- 31/10/2009 04:51:17 AM
361 Views
Why not Highlords in Tear?
- 31/10/2009 02:10:07 AM
908 Views
You dont really get it.
- 31/10/2009 12:23:35 PM
777 Views
Not at all. Their position is perfectly justified by their experiences.
- 31/10/2009 04:29:25 AM
880 Views
The a'dam and leashing of channelers does not change the fact that the OP can be misued...
- 31/10/2009 09:17:20 AM
872 Views
Which is why people should NOT be MORE angered toward Seanchan than toward WT.
- 31/10/2009 06:22:13 PM
757 Views
That's complete hogwash.
- 31/10/2009 10:23:50 PM
796 Views
Using the word "Hogwash" is inviting flames, but I will be nice about it
- 01/11/2009 05:44:16 AM
821 Views
Re: Using the word "Hogwash" is inviting flames, but I will be nice about it
- 05/11/2009 02:54:52 AM
1110 Views
Well that was rather silly.
- 31/10/2009 12:27:03 PM
723 Views
And a generation later, the same old problem arises. New channelers, with no one to stop them.
- 31/10/2009 10:28:35 PM
728 Views
Several valid points...
- 31/10/2009 05:17:09 PM
827 Views
I wonder what if Egwene happen to be a child kidnapped at Flame and sent to WT
- 31/10/2009 06:30:34 PM
807 Views
The sul'dam should be destroyed
- 31/10/2009 05:14:06 AM
763 Views
The people themselves shouldn't be.
- 31/10/2009 05:26:08 AM
780 Views
Only the Empress can remove the custom
- 31/10/2009 05:48:09 AM
757 Views
Due to their conditioning.
- 31/10/2009 06:03:32 AM
777 Views
She will 
(and ya, sul'dam become sul'dam from age 13-18 usually) *NM*
- 31/10/2009 06:12:48 AM
365 Views
(and ya, sul'dam become sul'dam from age 13-18 usually) *NM*
- 31/10/2009 06:12:48 AM
365 Views
I think the a'dam is the perfect solution for Blacks and the Shaido 'Wise Ones'.
- 01/11/2009 02:51:27 AM
841 Views
Yes.
- 04/11/2009 06:15:08 PM
705 Views