Active Users:1077 Time:13/11/2026 12:08:12 PM
Back to Messageboard Post New Thread Search Help Stats Rules
Re: The angreal magnifies the power of the individual holding it, not that of the entire circle. Watcher Send a noteboard - 12/11/2009 12:37:46 PM
To be fair to Sanderson I have seen a few transcripts where before giving answeers to fan questions he says that this is his understanding and he is open to correction on the mechanics of the one power, or in order places he says that he needs to check with Maria or team Jordan.

Given the amount of notes that RJ left (which has been said to be more that the number of pages in all the books) I would give him a break when it comes to answeering technical quesions eg. how does such a weave work or how do angreal work.

Again from what I've read when it comes to him putting something in the novel before it goes to publishing it goes to team Jordan who check the notes RJ left.
Reply to message
Sanderson's understanding of angreal is totally wrong... Shannow - 12/11/2009 11:10:57 AM 1989 Views
You should include quotes TheCrownless - 12/11/2009 11:42:20 AM 1170 Views
The angreal magnifies the power of the individual holding it, not that of the entire circle. Shannow - 12/11/2009 11:57:20 AM 1243 Views
Re: The angreal magnifies the power of the individual holding it, not that of the entire circle. Watcher - 12/11/2009 12:37:46 PM 1107 Views
Sure, I agree... Shannow - 12/11/2009 12:45:33 PM 1095 Views
Re: The angreal magnifies the power of the individual holding it, not that of the entire circle. TheCrownless - 12/11/2009 02:27:41 PM 1116 Views
Please elaborate... Shannow - 12/11/2009 02:42:17 PM 1120 Views
On the basis that we dont agree on the use of sa'angreals on a group. TheCrownless - 12/11/2009 03:02:29 PM 1099 Views
OK, I'll humour you. This once. Shannow - 12/11/2009 05:18:57 PM 1136 Views
How generous of you. TheCrownless - 12/11/2009 07:51:54 PM 1197 Views
Scrap that TheCrownless - 12/11/2009 08:32:36 PM 1072 Views
Rand Balefires a whole castle Insomdeon - 12/11/2009 01:10:05 PM 1265 Views
There is no basis for that conclusion... Shannow - 12/11/2009 02:02:37 PM 1136 Views
I could have sprayed TheCrownless - 12/11/2009 02:28:41 PM 1090 Views
Ever notice the "sa" in sa'angreal? fionwe1987 - 12/11/2009 03:09:30 PM 1253 Views
It stands for Super Amazing. *NM* TaskmasterJack - 12/11/2009 04:10:02 PM 518 Views
I was under the assumption it was super awesome but oh well. *NM* Blaine - 13/11/2009 06:08:36 AM 560 Views
There's never been any indication that sa'angreal work through a different mechanism to angreal... Shannow - 12/11/2009 04:51:13 PM 1211 Views
It has always been a viable theory, and Sanderson seems convincing...EDIT: RJ's take fionwe1987 - 12/11/2009 08:21:17 PM 1203 Views
Wrong place *ignore* Sidious - 12/11/2009 08:45:32 PM 1106 Views
Do you still stick by the exponential theory? TheCrownless - 12/11/2009 08:52:31 PM 1030 Views
I do *NM* Sidious - 12/11/2009 09:05:56 PM 469 Views
Good, 'cos it's bloody good. *NM* TheCrownless - 12/11/2009 10:56:30 PM 482 Views
Re: Wrong place *ignore* taura-tierno - 27/12/2009 06:14:51 PM 1098 Views
sa'angreal and angreal are only different in terms of the magnitude of their effects *NM* Marshall - 12/11/2009 06:56:43 PM 505 Views
Re: Ever notice the "sa" in sa'angreal? TheUltimateReality - 12/11/2009 07:48:37 PM 1125 Views
You are missing two important points PatAtt - 12/11/2009 05:09:35 PM 1350 Views
Response to both points... Shannow - 12/11/2009 05:57:11 PM 1172 Views
In fact, I've just read the actual report, and Sanderson didn't say anything near what you quoted. Shannow - 12/11/2009 06:06:39 PM 1054 Views
Re: Look at how similar descriptions of angreal and Sa'angreal affects are in the books. Tedtheman - 12/11/2009 07:34:16 PM 1142 Views
I completely agree with you Shannow Marshall - 12/11/2009 07:01:29 PM 1076 Views
Sidious' "One Power Dynamics" Corwin - 12/11/2009 08:10:41 PM 1634 Views
Oh, also Corwin - 12/11/2009 08:15:56 PM 1145 Views
As long as you reference him, I doubt he'd mind. *NM* Marshall - 12/11/2009 08:36:59 PM 508 Views
there's a slight problem with your theory Jim - 12/11/2009 08:19:25 PM 1016 Views
Probably Sidious - 12/11/2009 09:05:31 PM 1496 Views
Agreed, with one point Marshall - 12/11/2009 09:25:09 PM 1024 Views
Some ways the fixed amount theory could work... fionwe1987 - 13/11/2009 12:33:04 AM 1089 Views
There is an argument for a minimum strength argument in the Great Hunt Ryan - 13/11/2009 03:26:11 AM 1091 Views
Re: Some ways the fixed amount theory could work... Tedtheman - 13/11/2009 07:00:15 PM 1002 Views
Re: Sanderson's understanding of angreal is totally wrong... Tedtheman - 13/11/2009 07:11:34 PM 1088 Views
Yes it's also been mentioned before in earlier books BlackAdder - 19/11/2009 12:51:51 AM 1021 Views
Re: Yes it's also been mentioned before in earlier books taura-tierno - 27/12/2009 06:37:47 PM 1049 Views
Back to Messageboard Post New Thread Search Help Stats Rules

Reply to Message

Block Quote Paragraph Quote
Formatting
Smiley Codes