This theory can help to explain the whole Rand/Asmodean confrontation in Rhuidean, when both were tapping into the Choedan Kal. The results of Sidious' formula for determining strength in the Power with the Choedan Kal show that Rand and Verin, despite their vast difference in unaided potential in the Power, come very close to being able to channel an equivalent amount. Asmodean is much closer to Rand than Verin is, so even if Rand and Asmodean were not exactly equivalent in strength at this point, they would be close enough that it really wouldn't matter who was marginally stronger. This incident does not necessarily support the idea that sa'angreal provide a reservoir of Power, instead of an exponential increase.
Sanderson's understanding of angreal is totally wrong...
- 12/11/2009 11:10:57 AM
1841 Views
You should include quotes
- 12/11/2009 11:42:20 AM
1013 Views
The angreal magnifies the power of the individual holding it, not that of the entire circle.
- 12/11/2009 11:57:20 AM
1092 Views
Re: The angreal magnifies the power of the individual holding it, not that of the entire circle.
- 12/11/2009 12:37:46 PM
987 Views
Re: The angreal magnifies the power of the individual holding it, not that of the entire circle.
- 12/11/2009 02:27:41 PM
971 Views
Please elaborate...
- 12/11/2009 02:42:17 PM
949 Views
On the basis that we dont agree on the use of sa'angreals on a group.
- 12/11/2009 03:02:29 PM
942 Views
OK, I'll humour you. This once.
- 12/11/2009 05:18:57 PM
963 Views
Rand Balefires a whole castle
- 12/11/2009 01:10:05 PM
1118 Views
Ever notice the "sa" in sa'angreal?
- 12/11/2009 03:09:30 PM
1102 Views
It stands for Super Amazing. *NM*
- 12/11/2009 04:10:02 PM
441 Views
I was under the assumption it was super awesome but oh well. *NM*
- 13/11/2009 06:08:36 AM
491 Views
There's never been any indication that sa'angreal work through a different mechanism to angreal...
- 12/11/2009 04:51:13 PM
1057 Views
It has always been a viable theory, and Sanderson seems convincing...EDIT: RJ's take
- 12/11/2009 08:21:17 PM
1036 Views
Wrong place *ignore*
- 12/11/2009 08:45:32 PM
927 Views
Do you still stick by the exponential theory?
- 12/11/2009 08:52:31 PM
884 Views
sa'angreal and angreal are only different in terms of the magnitude of their effects *NM*
- 12/11/2009 06:56:43 PM
429 Views
You are missing two important points
- 12/11/2009 05:09:35 PM
1167 Views
Response to both points...
- 12/11/2009 05:57:11 PM
1015 Views
In fact, I've just read the actual report, and Sanderson didn't say anything near what you quoted.
- 12/11/2009 06:06:39 PM
885 Views
Re: Look at how similar descriptions of angreal and Sa'angreal affects are in the books.
- 12/11/2009 07:34:16 PM
975 Views
Sidious' "One Power Dynamics"
- 12/11/2009 08:10:41 PM
1439 Views
Oh, also
- 12/11/2009 08:15:56 PM
969 Views
Probably
- 12/11/2009 09:05:31 PM
1304 Views
Some ways the fixed amount theory could work...
- 13/11/2009 12:33:04 AM
935 Views
There is an argument for a minimum strength argument in the Great Hunt
- 13/11/2009 03:26:11 AM
934 Views

*NM*