Active Users:1125 Time:28/06/2026 01:03:27 AM
Scrap that TheCrownless Send a noteboard - 12/11/2009 08:32:36 PM
Im going with Sidious' exponential increase theory.
Come to the dark side, We have candy!

I'm Israel, he's Palestine, its more fun when you pick sides.
Reply to message
Sanderson's understanding of angreal is totally wrong... - 12/11/2009 11:10:57 AM 1892 Views
You should include quotes - 12/11/2009 11:42:20 AM 1068 Views
The angreal magnifies the power of the individual holding it, not that of the entire circle. - 12/11/2009 11:57:20 AM 1136 Views
Re: The angreal magnifies the power of the individual holding it, not that of the entire circle. - 12/11/2009 12:37:46 PM 1037 Views
Sure, I agree... - 12/11/2009 12:45:33 PM 1002 Views
Re: The angreal magnifies the power of the individual holding it, not that of the entire circle. - 12/11/2009 02:27:41 PM 1027 Views
Please elaborate... - 12/11/2009 02:42:17 PM 1010 Views
On the basis that we dont agree on the use of sa'angreals on a group. - 12/11/2009 03:02:29 PM 994 Views
OK, I'll humour you. This once. - 12/11/2009 05:18:57 PM 1021 Views
How generous of you. - 12/11/2009 07:51:54 PM 1096 Views
Scrap that - 12/11/2009 08:32:36 PM 985 Views
Rand Balefires a whole castle - 12/11/2009 01:10:05 PM 1168 Views
There is no basis for that conclusion... - 12/11/2009 02:02:37 PM 1046 Views
I could have sprayed - 12/11/2009 02:28:41 PM 1001 Views
Ever notice the "sa" in sa'angreal? - 12/11/2009 03:09:30 PM 1152 Views
It stands for Super Amazing. *NM* - 12/11/2009 04:10:02 PM 467 Views
I was under the assumption it was super awesome but oh well. *NM* - 13/11/2009 06:08:36 AM 512 Views
There's never been any indication that sa'angreal work through a different mechanism to angreal... - 12/11/2009 04:51:13 PM 1110 Views
It has always been a viable theory, and Sanderson seems convincing...EDIT: RJ's take - 12/11/2009 08:21:17 PM 1096 Views
Wrong place *ignore* - 12/11/2009 08:45:32 PM 991 Views
Do you still stick by the exponential theory? - 12/11/2009 08:52:31 PM 941 Views
I do *NM* - 12/11/2009 09:05:56 PM 424 Views
Good, 'cos it's bloody good. *NM* - 12/11/2009 10:56:30 PM 434 Views
Re: Wrong place *ignore* - 27/12/2009 06:14:51 PM 978 Views
Re: Ever notice the "sa" in sa'angreal? - 12/11/2009 07:48:37 PM 1027 Views
You are missing two important points - 12/11/2009 05:09:35 PM 1232 Views
I completely agree with you Shannow - 12/11/2009 07:01:29 PM 971 Views
Sidious' "One Power Dynamics" - 12/11/2009 08:10:41 PM 1505 Views
Oh, also - 12/11/2009 08:15:56 PM 1020 Views
As long as you reference him, I doubt he'd mind. *NM* - 12/11/2009 08:36:59 PM 455 Views
there's a slight problem with your theory - 12/11/2009 08:19:25 PM 908 Views
Probably - 12/11/2009 09:05:31 PM 1352 Views
Agreed, with one point - 12/11/2009 09:25:09 PM 941 Views
Some ways the fixed amount theory could work... - 13/11/2009 12:33:04 AM 982 Views
Re: Some ways the fixed amount theory could work... - 13/11/2009 07:00:15 PM 896 Views
Re: Sanderson's understanding of angreal is totally wrong... - 13/11/2009 07:11:34 PM 975 Views
Yes it's also been mentioned before in earlier books - 19/11/2009 12:51:51 AM 901 Views
Re: Yes it's also been mentioned before in earlier books - 27/12/2009 06:37:47 PM 921 Views

Reply to Message