Active Users:880 Time:13/05/2026 05:03:14 PM
There is an argument for a minimum strength argument in the Great Hunt Ryan Send a noteboard - 13/11/2009 03:26:11 AM
Verin is discussing the two sa'angreal with Ingtar in Cairhien. Here is the relevent quote.

"What? Oh, there is no need for that, I think. The two must be used in unison to handle enough of the One Power to Break the World - that was the way in the Age of Legends; a man and a woman working together were always ten times as strong as they were apart - and what Aes Sedai today would aid a man in channeling?
One by itself is powerful enough, but I can think of few women strong enough to survive the flow through the one on Tremalking. The Amyrlin, of course. Moiraine, and Elaida. Perhaps one or two others. And three still in training. As for Logain, it would have taken all his strength simply to keep from being burned to a cinder, with nothing left for doing anything. No, Ingtar, I don't think you need worry. At least, not until the real Dragon Reborn proclaims himself, and then we will all have enough to worry about as it is. Let us worry now about what we shall do when we are inside Barthanes's manor."
The past is just that, the past. You can only truly live by looking to the future!
Reply to message
Sanderson's understanding of angreal is totally wrong... - 12/11/2009 11:10:57 AM 1870 Views
You should include quotes - 12/11/2009 11:42:20 AM 1048 Views
The angreal magnifies the power of the individual holding it, not that of the entire circle. - 12/11/2009 11:57:20 AM 1122 Views
Re: The angreal magnifies the power of the individual holding it, not that of the entire circle. - 12/11/2009 12:37:46 PM 1020 Views
Sure, I agree... - 12/11/2009 12:45:33 PM 982 Views
Re: The angreal magnifies the power of the individual holding it, not that of the entire circle. - 12/11/2009 02:27:41 PM 1009 Views
Please elaborate... - 12/11/2009 02:42:17 PM 987 Views
On the basis that we dont agree on the use of sa'angreals on a group. - 12/11/2009 03:02:29 PM 977 Views
OK, I'll humour you. This once. - 12/11/2009 05:18:57 PM 1003 Views
How generous of you. - 12/11/2009 07:51:54 PM 1080 Views
Scrap that - 12/11/2009 08:32:36 PM 967 Views
Rand Balefires a whole castle - 12/11/2009 01:10:05 PM 1147 Views
There is no basis for that conclusion... - 12/11/2009 02:02:37 PM 1024 Views
I could have sprayed - 12/11/2009 02:28:41 PM 985 Views
Ever notice the "sa" in sa'angreal? - 12/11/2009 03:09:30 PM 1138 Views
It stands for Super Amazing. *NM* - 12/11/2009 04:10:02 PM 457 Views
I was under the assumption it was super awesome but oh well. *NM* - 13/11/2009 06:08:36 AM 502 Views
There's never been any indication that sa'angreal work through a different mechanism to angreal... - 12/11/2009 04:51:13 PM 1094 Views
It has always been a viable theory, and Sanderson seems convincing...EDIT: RJ's take - 12/11/2009 08:21:17 PM 1074 Views
Wrong place *ignore* - 12/11/2009 08:45:32 PM 970 Views
Do you still stick by the exponential theory? - 12/11/2009 08:52:31 PM 921 Views
I do *NM* - 12/11/2009 09:05:56 PM 413 Views
Good, 'cos it's bloody good. *NM* - 12/11/2009 10:56:30 PM 426 Views
Re: Wrong place *ignore* - 27/12/2009 06:14:51 PM 959 Views
Re: Ever notice the "sa" in sa'angreal? - 12/11/2009 07:48:37 PM 1013 Views
You are missing two important points - 12/11/2009 05:09:35 PM 1209 Views
I completely agree with you Shannow - 12/11/2009 07:01:29 PM 954 Views
Sidious' "One Power Dynamics" - 12/11/2009 08:10:41 PM 1480 Views
Oh, also - 12/11/2009 08:15:56 PM 1006 Views
As long as you reference him, I doubt he'd mind. *NM* - 12/11/2009 08:36:59 PM 445 Views
there's a slight problem with your theory - 12/11/2009 08:19:25 PM 891 Views
Probably - 12/11/2009 09:05:31 PM 1336 Views
Agreed, with one point - 12/11/2009 09:25:09 PM 918 Views
Some ways the fixed amount theory could work... - 13/11/2009 12:33:04 AM 965 Views
There is an argument for a minimum strength argument in the Great Hunt - 13/11/2009 03:26:11 AM 970 Views
Re: Some ways the fixed amount theory could work... - 13/11/2009 07:00:15 PM 878 Views
Re: Sanderson's understanding of angreal is totally wrong... - 13/11/2009 07:11:34 PM 962 Views
Yes it's also been mentioned before in earlier books - 19/11/2009 12:51:51 AM 879 Views
Re: Yes it's also been mentioned before in earlier books - 27/12/2009 06:37:47 PM 899 Views

Reply to Message