Active Users:177 Time:19/05/2024 04:49:12 AM
What if he makes multiple gateways at the same time? Shannow Send a noteboard - 15/11/2009 08:21:48 PM
Making a gateway is a nearly instantaneous process. Plus we've seen Lews Therin make up to six gateways at a time.

Over the span of a minute, he could probably make 36 gateways into a particular area - say 5 miles by 5 miles square.

If disrupting a gateway is a difficult art - as RJ seems to indicate, how is a single defender going to move around fast enough to block 36 gateways opening all over the area being defended?

In fact, if he has to see what he's doing, he would probably have to Travel himself to get to gateways that are forming more than a few hundred yards from his current location.

If an attacker spins 6 gateways simultaneously, to open at intervals of 1 mile from one another, I find it difficult to see how his opponent is going to block all of them. Especially if blocking a gateway is difficult to achieve, and requires a heck of a lot of concentration.

The only way I can see it working, is if some kind of defensive ward can be placed over an area, blocking it from the Pattern. And that this ward can then be attacked or penetrated by an opponent, if he is skilled enough. In turn, the defender can bolster the ward and repel the attempts to penetrate it by the attacker, if HE is skilled enough.

Thus, the battle is taking place at many levels, as RJ indicated.
This message last edited by Shannow on 15/11/2009 at 08:24:40 PM
Reply to message
So what was the point of a certain member of the Forsaken? - 13/11/2009 12:04:20 PM 1231 Views
Wait until Towers of Midnight. - 13/11/2009 02:04:23 PM 839 Views
Not exactly.... - 13/11/2009 10:55:57 PM 629 Views
Clickety click - 13/11/2009 03:04:37 PM 713 Views
RAFO *NM* - 13/11/2009 04:34:10 PM 256 Views
She made all of Rand's subsequent chapter's suspensful, IMO - 13/11/2009 08:31:49 PM 666 Views
I was disapointed too and needless to say, shocked. *NM* - 14/11/2009 09:31:45 AM 234 Views
I was initially... - 15/11/2009 02:03:14 AM 531 Views
Oh it made sense just so unexpected. Graendal and Semirhage. - 15/11/2009 01:27:17 PM 459 Views
Here's what I would have done... - 15/11/2009 02:45:32 PM 498 Views
Rand is not Dumbledore - 15/11/2009 03:10:58 PM 513 Views
Gateway blocking sphere? - 15/11/2009 03:28:09 PM 517 Views
We don't actually know that... - 15/11/2009 04:05:10 PM 544 Views
Re: We don't actually know that... - 15/11/2009 06:02:28 PM 523 Views
From Question of the week 14 - 15/11/2009 07:34:19 PM 488 Views
Disagree - 15/11/2009 08:14:28 PM 519 Views
What if he makes multiple gateways at the same time? - 15/11/2009 08:21:48 PM 483 Views
I agree. *NM* - 15/11/2009 08:50:54 PM 204 Views
But RJ answered this - 15/11/2009 09:47:57 PM 537 Views
You're ignoring a key sentence... - 15/11/2009 09:58:03 PM 553 Views
Re: You're ignoring a key sentence... - 16/11/2009 06:47:47 AM 523 Views
The issue is that it is easier to make a gateway than to block one - individually. - 15/11/2009 10:04:22 PM 542 Views
I don't think so - 16/11/2009 07:12:05 AM 669 Views
Problem is... - 16/11/2009 07:45:41 AM 497 Views
I agree with Sidious... - 15/11/2009 04:12:04 PM 514 Views
The quote exists. I'll get it for you and post it in a couple of hours. Gotta go to church now. - 15/11/2009 04:13:35 PM 489 Views
Ok, later - 15/11/2009 04:17:07 PM 503 Views
Here's the full quote, from Question of the Week 14. - 15/11/2009 07:30:29 PM 556 Views
Here's the way he should have done it... - 15/11/2009 06:19:18 PM 482 Views
I don't think I would put too much faith in that.... - 15/11/2009 09:32:22 PM 492 Views
Moghedien and Cyndane didn't attack Graendal, in fact... - 15/11/2009 09:36:03 PM 616 Views
That wasn't what I said.... - 16/11/2009 12:42:53 AM 461 Views
Re: That wasn't what I said.... - 16/11/2009 07:14:08 AM 809 Views
I guess you could see it that way - 16/11/2009 08:48:23 PM 561 Views
My bad... - 16/11/2009 02:22:35 AM 475 Views
She killed Asmodean, didn't she? - 15/11/2009 01:58:40 AM 510 Views
Moridin used her - 15/11/2009 06:54:59 PM 474 Views

Reply to Message