Active Users:659 Time:02/02/2026 10:42:36 AM
What if he makes multiple gateways at the same time? Shannow Send a noteboard - 15/11/2009 08:21:48 PM
Making a gateway is a nearly instantaneous process. Plus we've seen Lews Therin make up to six gateways at a time.

Over the span of a minute, he could probably make 36 gateways into a particular area - say 5 miles by 5 miles square.

If disrupting a gateway is a difficult art - as RJ seems to indicate, how is a single defender going to move around fast enough to block 36 gateways opening all over the area being defended?

In fact, if he has to see what he's doing, he would probably have to Travel himself to get to gateways that are forming more than a few hundred yards from his current location.

If an attacker spins 6 gateways simultaneously, to open at intervals of 1 mile from one another, I find it difficult to see how his opponent is going to block all of them. Especially if blocking a gateway is difficult to achieve, and requires a heck of a lot of concentration.

The only way I can see it working, is if some kind of defensive ward can be placed over an area, blocking it from the Pattern. And that this ward can then be attacked or penetrated by an opponent, if he is skilled enough. In turn, the defender can bolster the ward and repel the attempts to penetrate it by the attacker, if HE is skilled enough.

Thus, the battle is taking place at many levels, as RJ indicated.
This message last edited by Shannow on 15/11/2009 at 08:24:40 PM
Reply to message
So what was the point of a certain member of the Forsaken? - 13/11/2009 12:04:20 PM 1574 Views
Wait until Towers of Midnight. - 13/11/2009 02:04:23 PM 1211 Views
Not exactly.... - 13/11/2009 10:55:57 PM 960 Views
Clickety click - 13/11/2009 03:04:37 PM 1030 Views
RAFO *NM* - 13/11/2009 04:34:10 PM 401 Views
She made all of Rand's subsequent chapter's suspensful, IMO - 13/11/2009 08:31:49 PM 999 Views
I was disapointed too and needless to say, shocked. *NM* - 14/11/2009 09:31:45 AM 387 Views
I was initially... - 15/11/2009 02:03:14 AM 832 Views
Oh it made sense just so unexpected. Graendal and Semirhage. - 15/11/2009 01:27:17 PM 792 Views
Here's what I would have done... - 15/11/2009 02:45:32 PM 842 Views
Rand is not Dumbledore - 15/11/2009 03:10:58 PM 852 Views
Gateway blocking sphere? - 15/11/2009 03:28:09 PM 805 Views
We don't actually know that... - 15/11/2009 04:05:10 PM 877 Views
Re: We don't actually know that... - 15/11/2009 06:02:28 PM 877 Views
From Question of the week 14 - 15/11/2009 07:34:19 PM 833 Views
Disagree - 15/11/2009 08:14:28 PM 866 Views
What if he makes multiple gateways at the same time? - 15/11/2009 08:21:48 PM 828 Views
I agree. *NM* - 15/11/2009 08:50:54 PM 348 Views
But RJ answered this - 15/11/2009 09:47:57 PM 872 Views
You're ignoring a key sentence... - 15/11/2009 09:58:03 PM 880 Views
Re: You're ignoring a key sentence... - 16/11/2009 06:47:47 AM 880 Views
The issue is that it is easier to make a gateway than to block one - individually. - 15/11/2009 10:04:22 PM 927 Views
I don't think so - 16/11/2009 07:12:05 AM 1032 Views
Problem is... - 16/11/2009 07:45:41 AM 826 Views
I agree with Sidious... - 15/11/2009 04:12:04 PM 828 Views
The quote exists. I'll get it for you and post it in a couple of hours. Gotta go to church now. - 15/11/2009 04:13:35 PM 798 Views
Ok, later - 15/11/2009 04:17:07 PM 843 Views
Here's the full quote, from Question of the Week 14. - 15/11/2009 07:30:29 PM 903 Views
Here's the way he should have done it... - 15/11/2009 06:19:18 PM 806 Views
I don't think I would put too much faith in that.... - 15/11/2009 09:32:22 PM 864 Views
Moghedien and Cyndane didn't attack Graendal, in fact... - 15/11/2009 09:36:03 PM 971 Views
That wasn't what I said.... - 16/11/2009 12:42:53 AM 776 Views
Re: That wasn't what I said.... - 16/11/2009 07:14:08 AM 1152 Views
I guess you could see it that way - 16/11/2009 08:48:23 PM 888 Views
My bad... - 16/11/2009 02:22:35 AM 787 Views
She killed Asmodean, didn't she? - 15/11/2009 01:58:40 AM 826 Views
Moridin used her - 15/11/2009 06:54:59 PM 825 Views

Reply to Message