We know that, for e.g., Sammael could detect the location of a Gateway
Marshall Send a noteboard - 16/11/2009 08:21:57 PM
He may have simply had a ward that detected channeling in a certain viscinity. However, I don't see why a ward couldn't be extended to detect particular types of weaves. Imagine a guy in a control center, watching a screen that monitored a "gateway-detection" ward. A gateway entrance opens somewhere, a point on the monitor blips, and anti-gateway actions are immediately taken. Of course this process could be made more efficient (i.e. individual channelers patrolling the areas could be atuned to the ward).
How to disrupt gateways that are made into a battle zone...
16/11/2009 08:48:36 AM
- 837 Views
I might as well present my argument in full
16/11/2009 09:52:34 AM
- 650 Views
Both options can be valid, but here's why you MUST have the ward...
16/11/2009 10:10:55 AM
- 813 Views
Re: Both options can be valid, but here's why you MUST have the ward...
16/11/2009 12:08:30 PM
- 542 Views
I think there's some evidence in favor of the wards idea you are all missing.
16/11/2009 05:29:22 PM
- 494 Views
I disagree
16/11/2009 07:15:53 PM
- 496 Views
Except
16/11/2009 07:24:56 PM
- 455 Views
there's no indication that the gateway isn't almost on top of a city
17/11/2009 03:09:31 AM
- 447 Views
It's definitely possible that there can be a ward to detect a gateway opening.
17/11/2009 03:22:33 PM
- 473 Views
We know that, for e.g., Sammael could detect the location of a Gateway
16/11/2009 08:21:57 PM
- 461 Views
i think an automatic weave would be too complicated to cover any reasonable area.
17/11/2009 06:06:54 AM
- 482 Views
Re: i think an automatic weave would be too complicated to cover any reasonable area.
17/11/2009 12:53:19 PM
- 459 Views
I don't think you need to travel to the Gateway to disrupt it if the ward notifies you of location
17/11/2009 10:57:06 PM
- 524 Views
I believe that you cannot make a ward completely preventing Traveling.
17/11/2009 01:52:24 PM
- 452 Views