Active Users:1350 Time:26/09/2026 10:06:24 AM
Back to Messageboard Post New Thread Search Help Stats Rules
Yes it's also been mentioned before in earlier books BlackAdder Send a noteboard - 19/11/2009 12:51:51 AM
phrases like "the strongest Aes Sedai wielding the most powerful sa'angreal..."

if the angreal are only reservoirs, then the AS strength wouldn't matter.
Reply to message
Sanderson's understanding of angreal is totally wrong... Shannow - 12/11/2009 11:10:57 AM 1950 Views
You should include quotes TheCrownless - 12/11/2009 11:42:20 AM 1141 Views
The angreal magnifies the power of the individual holding it, not that of the entire circle. Shannow - 12/11/2009 11:57:20 AM 1206 Views
Re: The angreal magnifies the power of the individual holding it, not that of the entire circle. Watcher - 12/11/2009 12:37:46 PM 1087 Views
Sure, I agree... Shannow - 12/11/2009 12:45:33 PM 1065 Views
Re: The angreal magnifies the power of the individual holding it, not that of the entire circle. TheCrownless - 12/11/2009 02:27:41 PM 1082 Views
Please elaborate... Shannow - 12/11/2009 02:42:17 PM 1087 Views
On the basis that we dont agree on the use of sa'angreals on a group. TheCrownless - 12/11/2009 03:02:29 PM 1064 Views
OK, I'll humour you. This once. Shannow - 12/11/2009 05:18:57 PM 1094 Views
How generous of you. TheCrownless - 12/11/2009 07:51:54 PM 1165 Views
Scrap that TheCrownless - 12/11/2009 08:32:36 PM 1046 Views
Rand Balefires a whole castle Insomdeon - 12/11/2009 01:10:05 PM 1233 Views
There is no basis for that conclusion... Shannow - 12/11/2009 02:02:37 PM 1100 Views
I could have sprayed TheCrownless - 12/11/2009 02:28:41 PM 1058 Views
Ever notice the "sa" in sa'angreal? fionwe1987 - 12/11/2009 03:09:30 PM 1220 Views
It stands for Super Amazing. *NM* TaskmasterJack - 12/11/2009 04:10:02 PM 503 Views
I was under the assumption it was super awesome but oh well. *NM* Blaine - 13/11/2009 06:08:36 AM 541 Views
There's never been any indication that sa'angreal work through a different mechanism to angreal... Shannow - 12/11/2009 04:51:13 PM 1180 Views
It has always been a viable theory, and Sanderson seems convincing...EDIT: RJ's take fionwe1987 - 12/11/2009 08:21:17 PM 1157 Views
Wrong place *ignore* Sidious - 12/11/2009 08:45:32 PM 1067 Views
Do you still stick by the exponential theory? TheCrownless - 12/11/2009 08:52:31 PM 1004 Views
I do *NM* Sidious - 12/11/2009 09:05:56 PM 452 Views
Good, 'cos it's bloody good. *NM* TheCrownless - 12/11/2009 10:56:30 PM 467 Views
Re: Wrong place *ignore* taura-tierno - 27/12/2009 06:14:51 PM 1052 Views
sa'angreal and angreal are only different in terms of the magnitude of their effects *NM* Marshall - 12/11/2009 06:56:43 PM 486 Views
Re: Ever notice the "sa" in sa'angreal? TheUltimateReality - 12/11/2009 07:48:37 PM 1095 Views
You are missing two important points PatAtt - 12/11/2009 05:09:35 PM 1312 Views
Response to both points... Shannow - 12/11/2009 05:57:11 PM 1139 Views
In fact, I've just read the actual report, and Sanderson didn't say anything near what you quoted. Shannow - 12/11/2009 06:06:39 PM 1011 Views
Re: Look at how similar descriptions of angreal and Sa'angreal affects are in the books. Tedtheman - 12/11/2009 07:34:16 PM 1101 Views
I completely agree with you Shannow Marshall - 12/11/2009 07:01:29 PM 1043 Views
Sidious' "One Power Dynamics" Corwin - 12/11/2009 08:10:41 PM 1580 Views
Oh, also Corwin - 12/11/2009 08:15:56 PM 1102 Views
As long as you reference him, I doubt he'd mind. *NM* Marshall - 12/11/2009 08:36:59 PM 489 Views
there's a slight problem with your theory Jim - 12/11/2009 08:19:25 PM 978 Views
Probably Sidious - 12/11/2009 09:05:31 PM 1449 Views
Agreed, with one point Marshall - 12/11/2009 09:25:09 PM 998 Views
Some ways the fixed amount theory could work... fionwe1987 - 13/11/2009 12:33:04 AM 1061 Views
There is an argument for a minimum strength argument in the Great Hunt Ryan - 13/11/2009 03:26:11 AM 1056 Views
Re: Some ways the fixed amount theory could work... Tedtheman - 13/11/2009 07:00:15 PM 970 Views
Re: Sanderson's understanding of angreal is totally wrong... Tedtheman - 13/11/2009 07:11:34 PM 1051 Views
Yes it's also been mentioned before in earlier books BlackAdder - 19/11/2009 12:51:51 AM 984 Views
Re: Yes it's also been mentioned before in earlier books taura-tierno - 27/12/2009 06:37:47 PM 1000 Views
Back to Messageboard Post New Thread Search Help Stats Rules

Reply to Message

Block Quote Paragraph Quote
Formatting
Smiley Codes