In Every Case the Literal Words Were Truthful.
The Name With No Man Send a noteboard - 27/11/2009 02:09:10 PM
In this case they wouldn't be. You can be entirely truthful and entirely deceptive with truthful statements that imply an untruth. What you suggest is not a statement, but it's also false on its face. Implying falsehood with truth is deception, but implying falsehood with falsehood is just plain old lying.
Bound by the three oaths, can you can lie if you make it a question? As in "I am not Black Ajah?
22/11/2009 06:01:54 AM
- 966 Views
If you were intentionally trying to deceive someone, then no, you coldn't *NM*
22/11/2009 11:19:30 AM
- 235 Views
Throughout the series sisters have chosen their words to deceive, why would context matter. *NM*
22/11/2009 03:20:37 PM
- 242 Views
In Every Case the Literal Words Were Truthful.
27/11/2009 02:09:10 PM
- 441 Views
Let's just say this is a real world with a real language for a moment.
22/11/2009 10:47:40 PM
- 541 Views
In real world you assume when I ask the question that I am not trying to deceive
23/11/2009 04:05:38 PM
- 532 Views
Re: Bound by the three oaths, can you can lie if you make it a question? As in "I am not Black Ajah?
25/11/2009 04:23:06 PM
- 986 Views
I think the oaths so vague and depend on the morality of the speaker
25/11/2009 06:27:19 PM
- 486 Views