Active Users:579 Time:01/11/2026 04:25:09 AM
Destroyed With the Power, Which I Wouldn't Have Thought Possible. The Name With No Man Send a noteboard - 01/12/2009 11:47:26 AM
This one I can still find though:

"Rand used its own power upon it, crushing the distant globe, shattering it as if in the grip of a giant's hands.

The Choedan Kal exploded." p. 759, if anyone's curious.

He not only destroyed the Choedan Kal itself, but with such sudden force it made me wonder about collateral damage. So how pissed is Latra Posae at LTT now?

"Just because your plan backfired spectacularly doesn't mean you have to screw up mine!" :P
Reply to message
The loss of angreal - 30/11/2009 08:22:38 PM 1944 Views
Moiraine's return may sort out 2, 5 and 6 *NM* - 30/11/2009 08:51:00 PM 695 Views
The Eelfinn probably took their angreal - 30/11/2009 09:00:16 PM 1271 Views
sure who needs them anyway, the good guys are goin to win regardless *NM* - 30/11/2009 09:41:13 PM 529 Views
Basically! The only question is how? - 30/11/2009 10:00:15 PM 1362 Views
Lanfear's angreal is not with the Finns - 01/12/2009 04:29:17 AM 1345 Views
I'm not sure - 01/12/2009 07:11:26 AM 1070 Views
she didn't drop it. Mo was clawing it away as they tumbled through. - 01/12/2009 08:59:46 AM 1131 Views
Verin went to the Tower storerooms looking for the Oath Rod. - 30/11/2009 10:03:27 PM 1270 Views
I don't think her angreal belonged to the Tower - 01/12/2009 04:30:46 AM 1182 Views
I really miss the reference desk - 01/12/2009 06:01:55 AM 1260 Views
It's mentioned twice in Deceptive Appearances - 01/12/2009 06:23:27 AM 1296 Views
I meant it's not mentioned where/how she got it . - 01/12/2009 06:53:17 AM 1131 Views
Aahhh.... - 01/12/2009 08:16:15 AM 1214 Views
Isn't it in the Tower Law that all angreal belong to the Tower? - 06/08/2010 04:47:07 PM 1064 Views
On that note, what was the point of Graendal's angreal? - 30/11/2009 10:07:41 PM 1257 Views
Just another false lead - 30/11/2009 11:59:42 PM 1173 Views
Maybe not... she used it to repel Verin's shield - 14/12/2009 01:14:05 PM 1256 Views
It was probably just fun information - 01/12/2009 04:32:00 AM 1080 Views
Bel'al & the famous Tear collection - 06/08/2010 05:01:03 PM 1171 Views
Probably she just got it... - 01/12/2009 12:22:57 PM 1160 Views
Dead or not I thin BS has made it clear she'll be in ToM - 01/12/2009 07:07:10 PM 1157 Views
Moridin offered her #2 because... - 01/12/2009 11:52:34 PM 1338 Views
Sorry, I meant what was the plot point of bringing it up only to have her die off b4 it matters! - 02/12/2009 07:17:04 PM 1302 Views
The same as Shai'tan promising every Forsaken to be Nae'blis. - 02/12/2009 07:59:39 PM 1105 Views
Par for the course - 03/12/2009 01:22:38 AM 1461 Views
I wonder why Verin... - 30/11/2009 10:23:01 PM 1263 Views
I think Fanatic Templar is right. - 30/11/2009 11:24:31 PM 1334 Views
She might have mentioned it somewhere in... - 01/12/2009 02:27:32 AM 1149 Views
Re: She might have mentioned it somewhere in... - 02/12/2009 12:47:51 AM 1207 Views
Moraine had an Angreal? The only one I recall her having she returned in book 2. *NM* - 30/11/2009 11:25:07 PM 633 Views
Did she return it? I can't recall. *NM* - 01/12/2009 04:32:50 AM 554 Views
It's been a few years since I read the earlier volumes. *NM* - 02/12/2009 02:03:36 AM 565 Views
She never returned it - 01/12/2009 06:00:33 AM 1091 Views
did the male choedan kal get destroyed or did rand just destroy the access key ter'angreal? *NM* - 01/12/2009 01:24:38 AM 787 Views
Destroyed With the Power, Which I Wouldn't Have Thought Possible. - 01/12/2009 11:47:26 AM 1285 Views
Meaning What, Exactly? - 01/12/2009 11:35:43 AM 1348 Views
Well thank god Elayne will learn to make them - 01/12/2009 07:02:48 PM 1164 Views
Ha, maybe that's why they're rare. - 01/12/2009 07:38:46 PM 1277 Views
Re: Female CK - 14/12/2009 01:13:55 PM 1287 Views
The female Choedan Kal was destroyed as well - 14/12/2009 02:37:53 PM 1317 Views

Reply to Message