Active Users:2323 Time:18/06/2026 05:40:33 AM
On that note, what was the point of Graendal's angreal? Shannow Send a noteboard - 30/11/2009 10:07:41 PM
If Graendal is dead, then her aquisition of the ring angreal has served no puspose in terms of the plot. She hasn't killed one enemy who 'thought they knew her strength', before being unpleasantly surprised.

The scuffle with Cyndane and Moghedien was meaningless from a plot perspective since they never intended to kill her in any case.

Come to think of it, could the unfillfilled use of her angreal be a sign that she is actually still alive? Was her thought about surprising someone with it foreshadowing by RJ, or just a meaningless soundbyte?
This message last edited by Shannow on 30/11/2009 at 10:38:04 PM
Reply to message
The loss of angreal - 30/11/2009 08:22:38 PM 1842 Views
Moiraine's return may sort out 2, 5 and 6 *NM* - 30/11/2009 08:51:00 PM 655 Views
The Eelfinn probably took their angreal - 30/11/2009 09:00:16 PM 1169 Views
sure who needs them anyway, the good guys are goin to win regardless *NM* - 30/11/2009 09:41:13 PM 480 Views
Basically! The only question is how? - 30/11/2009 10:00:15 PM 1274 Views
Lanfear's angreal is not with the Finns - 01/12/2009 04:29:17 AM 1257 Views
I'm not sure - 01/12/2009 07:11:26 AM 986 Views
she didn't drop it. Mo was clawing it away as they tumbled through. - 01/12/2009 08:59:46 AM 1042 Views
Verin went to the Tower storerooms looking for the Oath Rod. - 30/11/2009 10:03:27 PM 1182 Views
I don't think her angreal belonged to the Tower - 01/12/2009 04:30:46 AM 1090 Views
I really miss the reference desk - 01/12/2009 06:01:55 AM 1168 Views
It's mentioned twice in Deceptive Appearances - 01/12/2009 06:23:27 AM 1170 Views
I meant it's not mentioned where/how she got it . - 01/12/2009 06:53:17 AM 1033 Views
Aahhh.... - 01/12/2009 08:16:15 AM 1102 Views
Isn't it in the Tower Law that all angreal belong to the Tower? - 06/08/2010 04:47:07 PM 976 Views
On that note, what was the point of Graendal's angreal? - 30/11/2009 10:07:41 PM 1132 Views
Just another false lead - 30/11/2009 11:59:42 PM 1042 Views
Maybe not... she used it to repel Verin's shield - 14/12/2009 01:14:05 PM 1146 Views
It was probably just fun information - 01/12/2009 04:32:00 AM 992 Views
Bel'al & the famous Tear collection - 06/08/2010 05:01:03 PM 1079 Views
Probably she just got it... - 01/12/2009 12:22:57 PM 1062 Views
Dead or not I thin BS has made it clear she'll be in ToM - 01/12/2009 07:07:10 PM 1036 Views
Moridin offered her #2 because... - 01/12/2009 11:52:34 PM 1233 Views
Sorry, I meant what was the plot point of bringing it up only to have her die off b4 it matters! - 02/12/2009 07:17:04 PM 1218 Views
The same as Shai'tan promising every Forsaken to be Nae'blis. - 02/12/2009 07:59:39 PM 1014 Views
Par for the course - 03/12/2009 01:22:38 AM 1361 Views
I wonder why Verin... - 30/11/2009 10:23:01 PM 1162 Views
I think Fanatic Templar is right. - 30/11/2009 11:24:31 PM 1233 Views
She might have mentioned it somewhere in... - 01/12/2009 02:27:32 AM 1038 Views
Re: She might have mentioned it somewhere in... - 02/12/2009 12:47:51 AM 1105 Views
Moraine had an Angreal? The only one I recall her having she returned in book 2. *NM* - 30/11/2009 11:25:07 PM 574 Views
Did she return it? I can't recall. *NM* - 01/12/2009 04:32:50 AM 502 Views
It's been a few years since I read the earlier volumes. *NM* - 02/12/2009 02:03:36 AM 522 Views
She never returned it - 01/12/2009 06:00:33 AM 988 Views
Meaning What, Exactly? - 01/12/2009 11:35:43 AM 1245 Views
Well thank god Elayne will learn to make them - 01/12/2009 07:02:48 PM 1070 Views
Ha, maybe that's why they're rare. - 01/12/2009 07:38:46 PM 1185 Views
Re: Female CK - 14/12/2009 01:13:55 PM 1161 Views
The female Choedan Kal was destroyed as well - 14/12/2009 02:37:53 PM 1199 Views

Reply to Message