I don't know what Sanderson may have said. *NM*
Tansu Targli Send a noteboard - 01/12/2009 10:13:58 PM
Mesaana was easily able to get past the Oath Rod.
- 01/12/2009 09:35:07 PM
1421 Views
I'm not convinced. I don't believe she'd want to subject herself to being sworn.
- 01/12/2009 09:54:40 PM
926 Views
Not just that, but in the AoL, the Oath Rod was used to "bind criminals". *NM*
- 02/12/2009 05:41:35 AM
350 Views
Didn't Sanderson say as much? *NM*
- 01/12/2009 10:06:56 PM
344 Views
I don't know what Sanderson may have said. *NM*
- 01/12/2009 10:13:58 PM
315 Views
I thought...
- 01/12/2009 10:11:45 PM
768 Views
To be honest, though, any Sister can defeat the Three Oaths.
- 01/12/2009 10:37:29 PM
774 Views
Well, that's just one oath. The other two are not as easy to circumvent.
- 02/12/2009 01:19:53 AM
853 Views
But given free will, they can interpret "danger" to mean "clear and present" or "potential danger"
- 02/12/2009 04:54:26 PM
743 Views
Last defense of life cannot mean potential danger. *NM*
- 02/12/2009 05:51:27 PM
293 Views
Yes it can. It all depends on interpretation.
- 03/12/2009 12:22:47 AM
678 Views
Ummm, what?
- 03/12/2009 02:23:08 AM
636 Views
Re: Ummm, what?
- 03/12/2009 11:15:20 PM
645 Views
None of this is a twisting of the Oaths. Her actions stick to the letter of the Oaths.
- 04/12/2009 04:29:44 AM
736 Views
Here's a couple quotes from BS
- 01/12/2009 11:57:16 PM
792 Views
Trouble is that would put a person into stasis
- 02/12/2009 04:14:31 AM
663 Views
It only has to be maintained long enough to take the Oaths. *NM*
- 02/12/2009 04:51:34 AM
302 Views
Eh, from what we've seen, Keepings don't really work like that
- 02/12/2009 06:42:19 AM
807 Views
