Active Users:958 Time:06/08/2025 02:26:24 PM
Back to Messageboard Post New Thread Search Help Stats Rules
shaido still have it moondog Send a noteboard - 02/12/2009 02:32:25 AM
Hmm...Whatever did happen to the rod that the shaido had?


remember therava catches galina at the end of the battle and takes it away from her. then tells her she will *never* touch it again, knowing galina has to obey.
"The RIAA has shown a certain disregard for the creative people of the industry in their eagerness to protect the revenues of the record companies." -- Frank Zappa

"That's the trouble with political jokes in this country... they get elected!" -- Dave Lippman
Reply to message
Mesaana was easily able to get past the Oath Rod. Tansu Targli - 01/12/2009 09:35:07 PM 1315 Views
Obviously artois - 01/12/2009 09:45:32 PM 870 Views
I'm not convinced. I don't believe she'd want to subject herself to being sworn. lord-of-shadow - 01/12/2009 09:54:40 PM 843 Views
Not just that, but in the AoL, the Oath Rod was used to "bind criminals". *NM* Lord Haart - 02/12/2009 05:41:35 AM 311 Views
It might even kill her Sidious - 04/12/2009 11:59:37 AM 600 Views
Didn't Sanderson say as much? *NM* Tom - 01/12/2009 10:06:56 PM 308 Views
I don't know what Sanderson may have said. *NM* Tansu Targli - 01/12/2009 10:13:58 PM 278 Views
I thought... artois - 01/12/2009 10:11:45 PM 704 Views
To be honest, though, any Sister can defeat the Three Oaths. RugbyPlayingAshaman - 01/12/2009 10:37:29 PM 687 Views
Re: To be honest, though, any Sister can defeat the Three Oaths. Tansu Targli - 01/12/2009 10:42:51 PM 683 Views
shaido still have it moondog - 02/12/2009 02:32:25 AM 730 Views
Well, that's just one oath. The other two are not as easy to circumvent. BlackAdder - 02/12/2009 01:19:53 AM 783 Views
But given free will, they can interpret "danger" to mean "clear and present" or "potential danger" RugbyPlayingAshaman - 02/12/2009 04:54:26 PM 614 Views
Last defense of life cannot mean potential danger. *NM* fionwe1987 - 02/12/2009 05:51:27 PM 254 Views
Yes it can. It all depends on interpretation. RugbyPlayingAshaman - 03/12/2009 12:22:47 AM 604 Views
Ummm, what? fionwe1987 - 03/12/2009 02:23:08 AM 557 Views
Re: Ummm, what? RugbyPlayingAshaman - 03/12/2009 11:15:20 PM 571 Views
None of this is a twisting of the Oaths. Her actions stick to the letter of the Oaths. fionwe1987 - 04/12/2009 04:29:44 AM 666 Views
Moiraine wasn't worried about getting around the Oaths Sidious - 04/12/2009 04:41:04 AM 602 Views
Here's a couple quotes from BS Light in the Night - 01/12/2009 11:57:16 PM 720 Views
Trouble is that would put a person into stasis Ryan - 02/12/2009 04:14:31 AM 588 Views
It only has to be maintained long enough to take the Oaths. *NM* Light in the Night - 02/12/2009 04:51:34 AM 268 Views
Eh, from what we've seen, Keepings don't really work like that beetnemesis - 02/12/2009 06:42:19 AM 732 Views
Probably just needs to be modified a bit Light in the Night - 02/12/2009 07:36:41 AM 716 Views
Keepers are for channellers, and are see through. Great Lord of Chaos - 02/12/2009 09:59:17 AM 609 Views
Turn off the Rod balefried - 02/12/2009 09:52:39 PM 703 Views
Does the bonded person do the channeling? Onarishma - 03/12/2009 05:52:09 AM 587 Views
....it is a physical requirement so "gloves" it is Onarishma - 03/12/2009 06:58:55 AM 1184 Views
Back to Messageboard Post New Thread Search Help Stats Rules

Reply to Message

Block Quote Paragraph Quote
Formatting
Smiley Codes