Active Users:1087 Time:10/12/2025 04:09:08 PM
Back to Messageboard Post New Thread Search Help Stats Rules
But given free will, they can interpret "danger" to mean "clear and present" or "potential danger" RugbyPlayingAshaman Send a noteboard - 02/12/2009 04:54:26 PM
The Oaths are only as useful as the mind they Bind.

The a'dam are actually quite insignificant compared to the Three Oaths.

A mind is more powerful than a tool.
"Those who think they have no time for bodily exercise will sooner or later have to find time for illness."
Reply to message
Mesaana was easily able to get past the Oath Rod. Tansu Targli - 01/12/2009 09:35:07 PM 1371 Views
Obviously artois - 01/12/2009 09:45:32 PM 933 Views
I'm not convinced. I don't believe she'd want to subject herself to being sworn. lord-of-shadow - 01/12/2009 09:54:40 PM 894 Views
Not just that, but in the AoL, the Oath Rod was used to "bind criminals". *NM* Lord Haart - 02/12/2009 05:41:35 AM 335 Views
It might even kill her Sidious - 04/12/2009 11:59:37 AM 649 Views
Didn't Sanderson say as much? *NM* Tom - 01/12/2009 10:06:56 PM 333 Views
I don't know what Sanderson may have said. *NM* Tansu Targli - 01/12/2009 10:13:58 PM 303 Views
I thought... artois - 01/12/2009 10:11:45 PM 742 Views
To be honest, though, any Sister can defeat the Three Oaths. RugbyPlayingAshaman - 01/12/2009 10:37:29 PM 743 Views
Re: To be honest, though, any Sister can defeat the Three Oaths. Tansu Targli - 01/12/2009 10:42:51 PM 721 Views
shaido still have it moondog - 02/12/2009 02:32:25 AM 775 Views
Well, that's just one oath. The other two are not as easy to circumvent. BlackAdder - 02/12/2009 01:19:53 AM 826 Views
But given free will, they can interpret "danger" to mean "clear and present" or "potential danger" RugbyPlayingAshaman - 02/12/2009 04:54:26 PM 672 Views
Last defense of life cannot mean potential danger. *NM* fionwe1987 - 02/12/2009 05:51:27 PM 282 Views
Yes it can. It all depends on interpretation. RugbyPlayingAshaman - 03/12/2009 12:22:47 AM 652 Views
Ummm, what? fionwe1987 - 03/12/2009 02:23:08 AM 603 Views
Re: Ummm, what? RugbyPlayingAshaman - 03/12/2009 11:15:20 PM 614 Views
None of this is a twisting of the Oaths. Her actions stick to the letter of the Oaths. fionwe1987 - 04/12/2009 04:29:44 AM 708 Views
Moiraine wasn't worried about getting around the Oaths Sidious - 04/12/2009 04:41:04 AM 652 Views
Here's a couple quotes from BS Light in the Night - 01/12/2009 11:57:16 PM 759 Views
Trouble is that would put a person into stasis Ryan - 02/12/2009 04:14:31 AM 633 Views
It only has to be maintained long enough to take the Oaths. *NM* Light in the Night - 02/12/2009 04:51:34 AM 292 Views
Eh, from what we've seen, Keepings don't really work like that beetnemesis - 02/12/2009 06:42:19 AM 780 Views
Probably just needs to be modified a bit Light in the Night - 02/12/2009 07:36:41 AM 764 Views
Keepers are for channellers, and are see through. Great Lord of Chaos - 02/12/2009 09:59:17 AM 659 Views
Turn off the Rod balefried - 02/12/2009 09:52:39 PM 772 Views
Does the bonded person do the channeling? Onarishma - 03/12/2009 05:52:09 AM 630 Views
....it is a physical requirement so "gloves" it is Onarishma - 03/12/2009 06:58:55 AM 1223 Views
Back to Messageboard Post New Thread Search Help Stats Rules

Reply to Message

Block Quote Paragraph Quote
Formatting
Smiley Codes