Active Users:1047 Time:10/12/2025 04:07:51 PM
Re: Ummm, what? RugbyPlayingAshaman Send a noteboard - 03/12/2009 11:15:20 PM
I cannot remember one instance where Moiraine used the Power on civilians and justified it as self defense.


That's not what I said. At all.

What I said was that Moiraine was prepared to defend herself at any moment, because of her mission. She did not indiscriminately start attacking people because of it, but her life has been in danger more than once, and often not on battlefields. Recall that Lan mentioned carrying her all the way back to the Tower with an arrow in her back, and her doing the same for him. Considering the nature of her mission, I believe they were in situations where anyone and anything could be an enemy.

You'll also recall that when she met Balthamel and Aginor, she didn't wait for them to attack - the fact that they were Forsaken and were in front of her was enough for her to start fighting them with killing weaves.
"Those who think they have no time for bodily exercise will sooner or later have to find time for illness."
This message last edited by RugbyPlayingAshaman on 03/12/2009 at 11:19:29 PM
Reply to message
Mesaana was easily able to get past the Oath Rod. - 01/12/2009 09:35:07 PM 1371 Views
Obviously - 01/12/2009 09:45:32 PM 932 Views
I'm not convinced. I don't believe she'd want to subject herself to being sworn. - 01/12/2009 09:54:40 PM 894 Views
Not just that, but in the AoL, the Oath Rod was used to "bind criminals". *NM* - 02/12/2009 05:41:35 AM 335 Views
It might even kill her - 04/12/2009 11:59:37 AM 648 Views
Didn't Sanderson say as much? *NM* - 01/12/2009 10:06:56 PM 333 Views
I don't know what Sanderson may have said. *NM* - 01/12/2009 10:13:58 PM 302 Views
I thought... - 01/12/2009 10:11:45 PM 741 Views
To be honest, though, any Sister can defeat the Three Oaths. - 01/12/2009 10:37:29 PM 743 Views
Re: To be honest, though, any Sister can defeat the Three Oaths. - 01/12/2009 10:42:51 PM 721 Views
shaido still have it - 02/12/2009 02:32:25 AM 775 Views
Well, that's just one oath. The other two are not as easy to circumvent. - 02/12/2009 01:19:53 AM 826 Views
But given free will, they can interpret "danger" to mean "clear and present" or "potential danger" - 02/12/2009 04:54:26 PM 671 Views
Last defense of life cannot mean potential danger. *NM* - 02/12/2009 05:51:27 PM 281 Views
Yes it can. It all depends on interpretation. - 03/12/2009 12:22:47 AM 652 Views
Ummm, what? - 03/12/2009 02:23:08 AM 603 Views
Re: Ummm, what? - 03/12/2009 11:15:20 PM 614 Views
Here's a couple quotes from BS - 01/12/2009 11:57:16 PM 759 Views
Trouble is that would put a person into stasis - 02/12/2009 04:14:31 AM 633 Views
It only has to be maintained long enough to take the Oaths. *NM* - 02/12/2009 04:51:34 AM 292 Views
Eh, from what we've seen, Keepings don't really work like that - 02/12/2009 06:42:19 AM 780 Views
Probably just needs to be modified a bit - 02/12/2009 07:36:41 AM 764 Views
Keepers are for channellers, and are see through. - 02/12/2009 09:59:17 AM 659 Views
Turn off the Rod - 02/12/2009 09:52:39 PM 772 Views
Does the bonded person do the channeling? - 03/12/2009 05:52:09 AM 630 Views
....it is a physical requirement so "gloves" it is - 03/12/2009 06:58:55 AM 1223 Views

Reply to Message