Active Users:905 Time:01/02/2026 12:09:33 PM
Re: Ummm, what? RugbyPlayingAshaman Send a noteboard - 03/12/2009 11:15:20 PM
I cannot remember one instance where Moiraine used the Power on civilians and justified it as self defense.


That's not what I said. At all.

What I said was that Moiraine was prepared to defend herself at any moment, because of her mission. She did not indiscriminately start attacking people because of it, but her life has been in danger more than once, and often not on battlefields. Recall that Lan mentioned carrying her all the way back to the Tower with an arrow in her back, and her doing the same for him. Considering the nature of her mission, I believe they were in situations where anyone and anything could be an enemy.

You'll also recall that when she met Balthamel and Aginor, she didn't wait for them to attack - the fact that they were Forsaken and were in front of her was enough for her to start fighting them with killing weaves.
"Those who think they have no time for bodily exercise will sooner or later have to find time for illness."
This message last edited by RugbyPlayingAshaman on 03/12/2009 at 11:19:29 PM
Reply to message
Mesaana was easily able to get past the Oath Rod. - 01/12/2009 09:35:07 PM 1420 Views
Obviously - 01/12/2009 09:45:32 PM 956 Views
I'm not convinced. I don't believe she'd want to subject herself to being sworn. - 01/12/2009 09:54:40 PM 926 Views
Not just that, but in the AoL, the Oath Rod was used to "bind criminals". *NM* - 02/12/2009 05:41:35 AM 350 Views
It might even kill her - 04/12/2009 11:59:37 AM 675 Views
Didn't Sanderson say as much? *NM* - 01/12/2009 10:06:56 PM 344 Views
I don't know what Sanderson may have said. *NM* - 01/12/2009 10:13:58 PM 314 Views
I thought... - 01/12/2009 10:11:45 PM 768 Views
To be honest, though, any Sister can defeat the Three Oaths. - 01/12/2009 10:37:29 PM 774 Views
Re: To be honest, though, any Sister can defeat the Three Oaths. - 01/12/2009 10:42:51 PM 754 Views
shaido still have it - 02/12/2009 02:32:25 AM 798 Views
Well, that's just one oath. The other two are not as easy to circumvent. - 02/12/2009 01:19:53 AM 852 Views
But given free will, they can interpret "danger" to mean "clear and present" or "potential danger" - 02/12/2009 04:54:26 PM 742 Views
Last defense of life cannot mean potential danger. *NM* - 02/12/2009 05:51:27 PM 293 Views
Yes it can. It all depends on interpretation. - 03/12/2009 12:22:47 AM 678 Views
Ummm, what? - 03/12/2009 02:23:08 AM 635 Views
Re: Ummm, what? - 03/12/2009 11:15:20 PM 645 Views
Here's a couple quotes from BS - 01/12/2009 11:57:16 PM 792 Views
Trouble is that would put a person into stasis - 02/12/2009 04:14:31 AM 662 Views
It only has to be maintained long enough to take the Oaths. *NM* - 02/12/2009 04:51:34 AM 301 Views
Eh, from what we've seen, Keepings don't really work like that - 02/12/2009 06:42:19 AM 807 Views
Probably just needs to be modified a bit - 02/12/2009 07:36:41 AM 786 Views
Keepers are for channellers, and are see through. - 02/12/2009 09:59:17 AM 702 Views
Turn off the Rod - 02/12/2009 09:52:39 PM 804 Views
Does the bonded person do the channeling? - 03/12/2009 05:52:09 AM 676 Views
....it is a physical requirement so "gloves" it is - 03/12/2009 06:58:55 AM 1250 Views

Reply to Message