Active Users:620 Time:21/06/2026 02:02:12 AM
I don't buy it Sidious Send a noteboard - 14/12/2009 03:19:59 PM

Why didn't Demandred go to the Stone of Tear and spend the time necessary to unravel Rand's wardings around Callandor, and take it for himself? There is no way that Rand's infantile skills could compare to Demandred's. RJ simply didn't want Demandred to have the sword.


Demandred couldn't know how much of LTT's memories Rand was working off of. He's not going to risk himself testing just how much Rand knows or doesn't know.


Demandred could try to unravel the warding without it catching him. If Elza could unravel Cadsuane's most advanced wardings using AOL weaves, then I don't see why Demandred couldn't compete on Lews Therin's level. He had months to try before Rand sent for it again.
Wheel of Time board admin
Fan of Lanfear
Reply to message
So why didn't Egwene Travel into the Tower storerooms from Salidar and steal the sa'angreal? - 13/12/2009 08:32:01 PM 1649 Views
Plot convenience *NM* - 13/12/2009 08:38:49 PM 483 Views
Regardless of more textual answers, this is the best *NM* - 14/12/2009 01:53:47 AM 425 Views
Agreed - 14/12/2009 04:17:56 AM 1053 Views
OK, but... - 14/12/2009 05:23:21 AM 1022 Views
Another example I like to cite... - 14/12/2009 12:03:36 PM 976 Views
I think there are dozens of examples - 14/12/2009 03:15:50 PM 927 Views
I don't see that as unbelievable. - 14/12/2009 06:09:44 AM 1032 Views
I don't buy it - 14/12/2009 03:19:59 PM 1056 Views
Re: I don't buy it - 14/12/2009 03:50:05 PM 954 Views
Re: I don't buy it - 14/12/2009 05:20:04 PM 998 Views
The Heart of the Stone was indeed guarded. - 14/12/2009 09:45:13 PM 914 Views
Re: Demandred, Callandor and the explicit-ness debate - 14/12/2009 01:08:34 PM 1139 Views
LT's skills - 16/12/2009 04:55:55 AM 852 Views
Basically. - 14/12/2009 06:17:08 PM 905 Views
Because Egwene did not intend to blast the Tower to bits. - 13/12/2009 09:18:13 PM 1061 Views
What darius_sedai said.. - 14/12/2009 11:00:24 AM 971 Views
Re: A few reasons - 14/12/2009 01:45:09 PM 1047 Views

Reply to Message