Active Users:680 Time:21/06/2026 04:39:55 AM
I don't buy it Sidious Send a noteboard - 14/12/2009 03:19:59 PM

Why didn't Demandred go to the Stone of Tear and spend the time necessary to unravel Rand's wardings around Callandor, and take it for himself? There is no way that Rand's infantile skills could compare to Demandred's. RJ simply didn't want Demandred to have the sword.


Demandred couldn't know how much of LTT's memories Rand was working off of. He's not going to risk himself testing just how much Rand knows or doesn't know.


Demandred could try to unravel the warding without it catching him. If Elza could unravel Cadsuane's most advanced wardings using AOL weaves, then I don't see why Demandred couldn't compete on Lews Therin's level. He had months to try before Rand sent for it again.
Wheel of Time board admin
Fan of Lanfear
Reply to message
So why didn't Egwene Travel into the Tower storerooms from Salidar and steal the sa'angreal? - 13/12/2009 08:32:01 PM 1651 Views
Plot convenience *NM* - 13/12/2009 08:38:49 PM 483 Views
Regardless of more textual answers, this is the best *NM* - 14/12/2009 01:53:47 AM 425 Views
Agreed - 14/12/2009 04:17:56 AM 1055 Views
OK, but... - 14/12/2009 05:23:21 AM 1024 Views
Another example I like to cite... - 14/12/2009 12:03:36 PM 979 Views
I think there are dozens of examples - 14/12/2009 03:15:50 PM 929 Views
I don't see that as unbelievable. - 14/12/2009 06:09:44 AM 1034 Views
I don't buy it - 14/12/2009 03:19:59 PM 1059 Views
Re: I don't buy it - 14/12/2009 03:50:05 PM 958 Views
Re: I don't buy it - 14/12/2009 05:20:04 PM 1000 Views
The Heart of the Stone was indeed guarded. - 14/12/2009 09:45:13 PM 917 Views
Re: Demandred, Callandor and the explicit-ness debate - 14/12/2009 01:08:34 PM 1143 Views
LT's skills - 16/12/2009 04:55:55 AM 854 Views
Basically. - 14/12/2009 06:17:08 PM 910 Views
Because Egwene did not intend to blast the Tower to bits. - 13/12/2009 09:18:13 PM 1063 Views
What darius_sedai said.. - 14/12/2009 11:00:24 AM 973 Views
Re: A few reasons - 14/12/2009 01:45:09 PM 1049 Views

Reply to Message