A thought that occured to me, and I'd like your opinion...
Phelix Send a noteboard - 18/12/2009 07:38:29 PM
IIRC, Wilders/Sparkers tend to be stronger than women who learn to touch the source. Correct me if I'm wrong on that.
Now, we also know that because the Tower was not actively recruiting, the majority of women who can channel are not found by the Tower.
If sparkers tend to be stronger than learners, and the majority are not associated with the Tower because they simply were not found, then the bulk of the women who should occupy the "average/strong" level were not found.
We also know that the majority of women who begin channeling on their own die of it. I cannot recall if it's 2/3 or 3/4 of women who touch the source without guidance die of it. The ones that survive often have blocks (as RPA mentioned in his reply above).
EDIT: It's actually 4/5 of women who touch the source without training die of it.
So, from those thoughts, I would suggest that the bulk of the women that would be considered "strong" by the Tower died from lack of training.
Now, we also know that because the Tower was not actively recruiting, the majority of women who can channel are not found by the Tower.
If sparkers tend to be stronger than learners, and the majority are not associated with the Tower because they simply were not found, then the bulk of the women who should occupy the "average/strong" level were not found.
We also know that the majority of women who begin channeling on their own die of it. I cannot recall if it's 2/3 or 3/4 of women who touch the source without guidance die of it. The ones that survive often have blocks (as RPA mentioned in his reply above).
EDIT: It's actually 4/5 of women who touch the source without training die of it.
So, from those thoughts, I would suggest that the bulk of the women that would be considered "strong" by the Tower died from lack of training.
I was Phelix on wotmania, I will always be Phelix in the "real" world, and now I am Phelix on RAFO.
You will make all kinds of mistakes; but as long as you are generous and true and also fierce you cannot hurt the world or even seriously distress her.- Churchill
*MySmiley*
You will make all kinds of mistakes; but as long as you are generous and true and also fierce you cannot hurt the world or even seriously distress her.- Churchill
*MySmiley*
This message last edited by Phelix on 18/12/2009 at 08:07:55 PM
The One Power Bell Curve: Proof that it is not centered on 50% of the strongest channeler's strength
- 18/12/2009 08:37:55 AM
1610 Views
I always thought the curve was one sided
- 18/12/2009 01:17:32 PM
911 Views
The Curve only refers to the channeling population, not to non-channelers.
- 18/12/2009 01:56:25 PM
915 Views
I would say that your sample is flawed.
- 18/12/2009 05:02:02 PM
1003 Views
It doesn't matter...
- 18/12/2009 10:02:38 PM
849 Views
But, it sort of does.
- 18/12/2009 10:43:08 PM
921 Views
So you're saying that no modern Aes Sedai are even of average strength?
- 18/12/2009 10:51:01 PM
1035 Views
The Tower is restricted to the middle...
- 18/12/2009 05:35:03 PM
1076 Views
Two things...
- 18/12/2009 09:28:25 PM
927 Views
The culling theory...
- 18/12/2009 09:36:34 PM
864 Views
The culling theory applies to the ENTIRE population, not just Aes Sedai...
- 18/12/2009 09:42:31 PM
978 Views
Several more things...
- 18/12/2009 11:26:19 PM
1005 Views
You don't understand your own model...
- 18/12/2009 11:38:05 PM
1042 Views
So RJ was wrong about Bell Curve distribution?
- 19/12/2009 06:03:24 PM
910 Views
So, Aviendha trumps RJ? A woman who, as late as tGS, doesn't know what she's doing with the OP?
- 19/12/2009 06:12:42 PM
884 Views
Age-Related Sample Bias
- 18/12/2009 06:41:03 PM
869 Views
I have no problem with that...but it implies that the average woman today isn't at 50% of Lanfear...
- 18/12/2009 09:46:00 PM
985 Views
Partially agreed...
- 18/12/2009 10:13:46 PM
886 Views
Well, the Aes Sedai are the only group that we have detailed strength info about...
- 18/12/2009 10:26:48 PM
1026 Views
Sharina is AS ... she'd be dead in a few years if she hadn't gone to the Tower *NM*
- 28/12/2009 01:08:20 AM
923 Views
A thought that occured to me, and I'd like your opinion...
- 18/12/2009 07:38:29 PM
868 Views
Is it just my bad memory or is one of the wondergirls not a sparker?
- 18/12/2009 10:12:59 PM
859 Views
Easier sulution, and real example.
- 18/12/2009 10:03:20 PM
929 Views
And that is indeed the solution I feel most comfortable with...
- 18/12/2009 10:08:40 PM
897 Views
Re: And that is indeed the solution I feel most comfortable with...
- 19/12/2009 11:39:31 AM
1113 Views
Dude, Seriously?
- 18/12/2009 10:19:25 PM
869 Views
Indeed, and that's why I propose that...
- 18/12/2009 10:31:23 PM
920 Views
So RJ used two separate scales, one actual one relative, to explain the same thing?
- 18/12/2009 11:33:20 PM
865 Views
- 18/12/2009 11:33:20 PM
865 Views
Yes, "Bell Curve" does not mean Gausian. Or normal distribution.
- 19/12/2009 11:24:10 PM
870 Views
I'm sorry, but I've never heard of a non-Gaussian bell curve. Can you prove its existence? *NM*
- 20/12/2009 03:24:22 AM
482 Views
Maybe people in my field just use the term in a non-technical way. We do things with ...
- 21/12/2009 07:24:43 PM
838 Views
That's because outliers in IQ tests are excluded form the curve. *NM*
- 18/12/2009 11:31:23 PM
492 Views
Re: The One Power Bell Curve: Proof that it is not centered on 50% of the strongest channeler's stre
- 19/12/2009 06:02:34 PM
841 Views
Mathmatically this is very close to the system I proposed in another thread
- 27/12/2009 01:23:51 AM
832 Views
Re: The One Power Bell Curve:
- 27/12/2009 10:05:33 PM
1002 Views
What makes you think Alviarin is "middling"?
- 27/12/2009 10:28:13 PM
1195 Views

