Active Users:556 Time:19/09/2025 01:58:19 AM
But, it sort of does. RugbyPlayingAshaman Send a noteboard - 18/12/2009 10:43:08 PM
What I'm saying is that Moiraine, a strong Aes Sedai, may not be above average for female channelers as a whole. She may very well be on the upward curve of the bell rather than near the top. A key point to consider is that before her time, there were three Aes Sedai near Cadsuane's strength level, and a few generations before that, we have to assume that there were more powerful Sisters above Cadsuane's level who died before she was born. Thus the White Tower truly is in a decline - perhaps at one point, when Aes Sedai were more respected and less political, it represented a diverse range of strengths, but it seems that as the years wore on and fewer girls sought out the Tower, they dropped below the female average.

I would say that Egwene, Elayne and Aviendha are right at the point where above average channelers start merging into stronger channelers but not much further beyond it - they are strong enough to always be considered powerful, but not exceptionally strong enough to be in the same class as the Forsaken.
"Those who think they have no time for bodily exercise will sooner or later have to find time for illness."
Reply to message
The One Power Bell Curve: Proof that it is not centered on 50% of the strongest channeler's strength - 18/12/2009 08:37:55 AM 1578 Views
I always thought the curve was one sided - 18/12/2009 01:17:32 PM 886 Views
I would say that your sample is flawed. - 18/12/2009 05:02:02 PM 961 Views
well said *NM* - 18/12/2009 05:12:40 PM 453 Views
It doesn't matter... - 18/12/2009 10:02:38 PM 819 Views
But, it sort of does. - 18/12/2009 10:43:08 PM 880 Views
So you're saying that no modern Aes Sedai are even of average strength? - 18/12/2009 10:51:01 PM 979 Views
Are you sure it's the same bell curve from the AoL? - 18/12/2009 11:11:19 PM 926 Views
The Tower is restricted to the middle... - 18/12/2009 05:35:03 PM 1040 Views
Two things... - 18/12/2009 09:28:25 PM 885 Views
The culling theory... - 18/12/2009 09:36:34 PM 830 Views
The culling theory applies to the ENTIRE population, not just Aes Sedai... - 18/12/2009 09:42:31 PM 941 Views
Yes, but Aes Sedai take it to a new level... - 18/12/2009 09:48:59 PM 1016 Views
Re: Yes, but Aes Sedai take it to a new level... - 18/12/2009 10:06:15 PM 809 Views
Several more things... - 18/12/2009 11:26:19 PM 969 Views
You don't understand your own model... - 18/12/2009 11:38:05 PM 1001 Views
So RJ was wrong about Bell Curve distribution? - 19/12/2009 06:03:24 PM 886 Views
Re: So RJ was wrong about Bell Curve distribution? - 19/12/2009 06:10:52 PM 858 Views
Its simple really... - 19/12/2009 06:15:23 PM 865 Views
Age-Related Sample Bias - 18/12/2009 06:41:03 PM 835 Views
A thought that occured to me, and I'd like your opinion... - 18/12/2009 07:38:29 PM 836 Views
Well Sharina isn't a sparker and she's the strongest AS - 18/12/2009 07:57:17 PM 844 Views
Yes... - 18/12/2009 08:01:57 PM 935 Views
Is it just my bad memory or is one of the wondergirls not a sparker? - 18/12/2009 10:12:59 PM 821 Views
I think it's just a bad memory... - 18/12/2009 10:19:25 PM 832 Views
Easier sulution, and real example. - 18/12/2009 10:03:20 PM 896 Views
And that is indeed the solution I feel most comfortable with... - 18/12/2009 10:08:40 PM 865 Views
Re: And that is indeed the solution I feel most comfortable with... - 19/12/2009 11:39:31 AM 1078 Views
Agree, but a little more curvy is better - 19/12/2009 11:17:16 PM 782 Views
*facepalm* - 18/12/2009 10:13:16 PM 862 Views
That's just the normalized value graphed on a log scale. - 19/12/2009 11:20:41 PM 840 Views
Dude, Seriously? - 18/12/2009 10:19:25 PM 846 Views
Indeed, and that's why I propose that... - 18/12/2009 10:31:23 PM 858 Views
Yes, "Bell Curve" does not mean Gausian. Or normal distribution. - 19/12/2009 11:24:10 PM 839 Views
It does to RJ - 20/12/2009 03:12:30 PM 933 Views
Yes, "Bell Curve" does not mean Gausian. Or normal distribution. - 19/12/2009 11:24:11 PM 811 Views
That's because outliers in IQ tests are excluded form the curve. *NM* - 18/12/2009 11:31:23 PM 481 Views
Really?!?! then what is the definition of a IQ of 200? - 19/12/2009 11:28:18 PM 1148 Views
You can have IQ's above that... - 20/12/2009 05:09:44 AM 873 Views
I said that in the other post and was half torn to pieces *NM* - 19/12/2009 11:38:25 AM 426 Views
Eh. Ignore the IQ value and draw it on a linear weight scale - 19/12/2009 11:26:23 PM 825 Views
Re: The One Power Bell Curve: Proof that it is not centered on 50% of the strongest channeler's stre - 19/12/2009 06:02:34 PM 808 Views
I like this idea - 20/12/2009 04:01:28 PM 1001 Views
Accidental Post *NM* - 20/12/2009 07:11:09 PM 464 Views
Mathmatically this is very close to the system I proposed in another thread - 27/12/2009 01:23:51 AM 798 Views
Re: The One Power Bell Curve: - 27/12/2009 10:05:33 PM 954 Views
What makes you think Alviarin is "middling"? - 27/12/2009 10:28:13 PM 1158 Views
Re: What makes you think Alviarin is "middling"? - 28/12/2009 03:19:14 PM 843 Views
Re: What makes you think Alviarin is "middling"? - 28/12/2009 03:30:44 PM 1055 Views

Reply to Message